Abstract
The present work demonstrates that observers grossly underestimate the length of lines parallel to their line of sight. In Experiment 1, observers, working from memory, estimated the length of a dashed line on the road to be 0.61 m. This result is consistent with observers' using an average visual angle converted to the physical length of visible lines on the road to estimate their length. In Experiment 2, observers gave verbal and matching estimates that significantly underestimated the length of a 3.05-m line on the ground that was parallel to their line of sight. In Experiment 3, observers significantly underestimated the length of dashed lines on the road while in a moving car. The results of Experiments 1 and 3 are described well by Euclidean geometry, whereas the tangle model that utilizes an increasing function of the visual angle to describe perceived extent best describes the results of Experiment 2.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battro, A. M., Netto, S. P., & Rozestraten, R. J. A. (1976). Riemannian geometries of variable curvature in visual space: Visual alleys, horopters, and triangles in big open fields. Perception, 5, 9–23.
Beusmans, J. M. H. (1998). Optic flow and the metric of the visual ground plane. Vision Research, 38, 1153–1170.
Blank, A. A. (1958). Analysis of experiments in binocular space perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 48, 911–925.
Foley, J. M., Ribeiro-Filho, N. P., & Da Silva, J. A. (2004). Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space. Vision Research, 44, 147–156.
Gilinsky, A. S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58, 460–482.
Gogel, W. C. (1964). Visual perception of spatial extent. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 54, 411–416.
Gogel, W. C. (1974). Cognitive factors in spatial responses. Psychologia, 17, 213–225.
Gogel, W. C. (1998). An analysis of perceptions from changes in optical size. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 805–820.
Gogel, W. C., & Da Silva, J. A. (1987). Familiar size and the theory of off-sized perceptions. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 318–328.
Gogel, W. C., & Eby, D. W. (1997). Measures of perceived linear size, sagittal motion, and visual angle from expansions and contractions. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 783–806.
Granrud, C. E., Granrud, M. A., Koc, J. C., Peterson, R. W., & Wright, S. M. (2003). Perceived size of traffic lights: A failure of size constancy for objects viewed at a distance. Journal of Vision, 3, 491a. Available at journalofvision.org/3/9/491, doi: 10.1167/3.9.491.
Haber, R. N. (1985). Toward a theory of the perceived spatial layout of scenes. Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing, 31, 282–321.
Harte, D. B. (1975). Estimates of the length of highway guidelines and spaces. Human Factors, 17, 455–460.
Harway, N. I. (1963). Judgment of distance in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 385–390.
Hecht, H., van Doorn, A., & Koenderink, J. J. (1999). Compression of visual space in natural scenes and in their photographic counterparts. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1269–1286.
Higashiyama, A. (1992). Anisotropic perception of visual angle: Impli cations for the horizontal-vertical illusion, overconstancy of size, and the moon illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 218–230.
Higashiyama, A., & Kitano, S. (1991). Perceived size and distance of persons in natural outdoor settings: The effects of familiar size. Psychologia, 34, 188–199.
Kaiser, P. K. (1967). Perceived shape and its dependency on perceived slant. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 345–353.
Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Lappin, J. S. (2000). Direct measurement of the curvature of visual space. Perception, 29, 69–79.
Kudoh, N. (2005). Dissociation between visual perception of allocentric distance and visually directed walking of its extent. Perception, 34, 1399–1416.
Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 906–921.
Loomis, J. M., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 397–402.
Loomis, J. M., Philbeck, J. W., & Zahorik, P. (2002). Dissociation between location and shape in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1202–1212.
Luneburg, R. K. (1950). The metric of binocular visual space. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 40, 627–642.
Luria, S. M., Kinney, J. S., & Weissman, S. (1967). Distance estimates with (“filled”) and (“unfilled”) space. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 24, 1007–1010.
Matsushima, E. H., de Oliveira, A. P., Ribeiro-Filho, N. P., & Da Silva, J. A. (2005). Visual angle as determinant factor for relative distance perception. Psicológica, 26, 97–104.
McBeath, M. K., Neuhoff, J. G., & Schiano, D. J. (1993, June). Familiar suspended objects appear smaller than actual independent of viewing distance. Poster presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, Chicago.
Meng, J. C., & Sedgwick, H. A. (2002). Distance perception across spatial discontinuities. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1–14.
Norman, J. F., Crabtree, C. E., Clayton, A. M., & Norman, H. F. (2005). The perception of distances and spatial relationships in natural outdoor environments. Perception, 34, 1315–1324.
Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Tittle, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of three-dimensional length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 173–186.
Ohba, S. (1966). Changes of perceived size of object in the downward viewing condition to the ground. Psychologia, 9, 95–101.
Ohio Department of Transportation (2005). Ohio manual of uniform traffic control devices. Columbus, OH: Author.
Ooi, T. L.,Wu, B., & He, Z. J. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414, 197–200.
Pizlo, Z. (1994). A theory of shape constancy based on perspective invariants. Vision Research, 34, 1637–1658.
Sinai, M. J., Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (1998). Terrain influences accurate judgment of distance. Nature, 395, 497–500.
Teghtsoonian, M. (1972). Apparent length as a function of tilt does not depend on orientation of the standard. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 191–197.
Thouless, R. H. (1931). Phenomenal regression to the real object: I. Journal of Psychology, 21, 339–359.
Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (2003). The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 31–47.
Todd, J. T., Tittle, J. S., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Distortions of threedimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception, 24, 75–86.
Toye, R. C. (1986). The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 85–92.
Van de Geer, J. P., & Zwaan, E. J. (1966). Size-constancy as dependent upon the angle of regard and spatial direction of the stimulus object. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 563–575.
Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 483–495.
Wootton, K. I., Sharp, J. L., & Granrud, C. E. (2004). Perceived size of traffic stoplights: Effects of assumed size on observers' size estimates. Journal of Vision, 4, 885a. Available at journalofvision.org/4/8/885, doi: 10.1167/4.8.885.
Wu, B., Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (2004). Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information. Nature, 428, 73–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Note—Accepted by the editorial board of Editor-Elect Jeremy M. Wolfe.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaffer, D.M., Maynor, A.B. & Roy, W.L. The visual perception of lines on the road. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 1571–1580 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1571
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1571