NEOWISE REACTIVATION MISSION YEAR TWO: ASTEROID DIAMETERS AND ALBEDOS

, , , , , , , , and

Published 2016 August 19 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation C. R. Nugent et al 2016 AJ 152 63 DOI 10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/63

1538-3881/152/3/63

ABSTRACT

The Near-Earth Object Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE) mission continues to detect, track, and characterize minor planets. We present diameters and albedos calculated from observations taken during the second year since the spacecraft was reactivated in late 2013. These include 207 near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) and 8885 other asteroids. Of the NEAs, 84% NEAs did not have previously measured diameters and albedos by the NEOWISE mission. Comparison of sizes and albedos calculated from NEOWISE measurements with those measured by occultations, spacecraft, and radar-derived shapes shows accuracy consistent with previous NEOWISE publications. Diameters and albedos fall within ±∼20% and ±∼40%, 1-sigma, respectively, of those measured by these alternate techniques. NEOWISE continues to preferentially discover near-Earth objects which are large (>100 m), and have low albedos.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Observing asteroids at infrared wavelengths is an effective method for calculating diameters for large numbers of asteroids. Since asteroid albedos can vary by approximately an order of magnitude, sizes estimated from reflected visible light fluxes alone have large uncertainties. Combining diameters calculated from infrared fluxes with visible magnitudes yields albedo measurements. Together, diameter and albedo measurements are basic physical characterizations that enable further investigations, including studies of asteroid families (Carruba et al. 2013; Masiero et al. 2013; Walsh et al. 2013; Milani et al. 2014; Masiero et al. 2015a, 2015b) and size-frequency distributions (Zellner 1979; Gradie & Tedesco 1982; Bus & Binzel 2002; Tedesco et al. 2002; Mainzer et al. 2011b; Grav et al. 2011, 2012a; Bauer et al. 2013).

We present diameters and albedos of asteroids from the second year of the Near-Earth Object Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE) mission following the reactivation of the spacecraft from hibernation in late 2013. Diameters and albedos of asteroids from the first year of the NEOWISE mission following reactivation are given in Nugent et al. (2015). NEOWISE is a space-based infrared telescope that obtains an image of the sky every 11 seconds simultaneously in two bands, W1 (3.4 μm) and W2 (4.6 μm). From its Sun-synchronous orbit around Earth, NEOWISE observes the entire static sky every six months. The original mission, WISE, is described in detail in Wright et al. (2010), and the NEOWISE enhancement to the mission is described in Mainzer et al. (2011a). After successfully completing its prime mission in 2011, the WISE spacecraft was placed into hibernation for 32 months before being reactivated and renamed NEOWISE in late 2013. The NEOWISE reactivation mission is described in Mainzer et al. (2014a).

The goals of the NEOWISE mission are to discover, track, and characterize minor planets. Images and extracted source lists from all phases of the WISE and NEOWISE missions have been delivered to the public via the Infrared Science Archive (Cutri et al. 2012, 2015), NASA's designated archive for infrared astronomical data.

During the initial portion of the mission, NEOWISE employed four channels; 3.4, 4.6, 12, and 22 μm. The longest two wavelength channels required cooling to <8 K using a dual-stage solid hydrogen cryostat. Diameters and albedos for a variety of small-body populations were calculated using this fully cryogenic portion of the mission (see Table 1). As the cryogen was depleted, the 12 and 22 μm channels became inoperative; after this, the mission continued for several months using only its 3.4 and 4.6 μm channels. A summary of near-Earth asteroid (NEAs) and main belt asteroid (MBA) albedos and diameters calculated during various phases of the mission is given in Table 2. These measurements have also been submitted to NASA's Planetary Data System. Thermal model calibration results, including comparison of cryogenic WISE/NEOWISE-derived diameters to other observations, are given in Mainzer et al. (2011c, 2011d).

Table 1.  Diameters and Albedos for Various Small-body Populations, Calculated from Fully Cryogenic (3.4, 4.6, 12, and 22 μm Bands) NEOWISE Mission Data

Population Associated References
Near-Earth asteroids Mainzer et al. (2011b), Mainzer et al. (2014b)
Main belt asteroids Masiero et al. (2011)
Active main belt objects Bauer et al. (2012b)
Trojans Grav et al. (2012b)
Hildas Grav et al. (2012a)
Irregular satellites Grav et al. (2015)
Centaurs Bauer et al. (2013)
Comets Bauer et al. (2011, 2012a, 2015),

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 2.  Previously Published Papers containing NEA and MBA Diameters and Albedos Calculated from NEOWISE Mission Data

Mission Phase Detection Bands (μm) References for NEAs References for MBAs
Fully cryogenic 3.4, 4.6, 12, 22 Mainzer et al. (2011b), Masiero et al. (2011),
    Mainzer et al. (2014b) Masiero et al. (2014)
3-Band and Post cryogenic 3.4, 4.6, (some 12) Mainzer et al. (2012a) Masiero et al. (2012)
Year 1 ofreactivation 3.4, 4.6 Nugent et al. (2015) Nugent et al. (2015)

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

This second year of data also provides multi-epoch observational data of uniform quality that can be used to better constrain the sizes, shapes, rotation state, and thermophysical properties of the 9092 asteroids in the reactivation Year 2 sample.

We present preliminary diameters and albedos calculated from NEOWISE Year 2 Reactivation mission observations, which spanned 2014 December 13 to 2015 December 13. Diameters and albedos calculated from NEOWISE Year 2 Reactivation mission observations will be submitted to the Planetary Data System.

2. DISCOVERIES AND FOLLOW UP

NEOWISE discovered 198 NEAs and comets during Years 1 and 2 of the Reactivation mission. In addition to observing 175 NEAs that had not had diameters measured previously from NEOWISE data, the Year 2 Reactivation mission obtained thermal infrared observations at additional epochs for 32 NEAs. NEOWISE typically observes asteroids ∼10–12 times over ∼1–1.5 days, and requires a minimum of 5 detections of a discovery candidate for submission to the Minor Planet Center (MPC).

NEOWISE observes with a fixed observing cadence, and additional follow up observations are usually necessary to confirm that new minor planet candidates have been discovered. Since NEOWISE cannot perform targeted follow up on its own, these observations must be made by ground-based observers. Given that near-Earth objects (NEOs) are of a population of special interest, NEOWISE candidate NEOs are listed on the MPC Near-Earth Object Confirmation Page (NEOCP) to facilitate follow up. NEOWISE regularly relies on many ground-based observers for follow up, including Spacewatch, observers at the Institute for Astronomy at the University of Hawaii, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global telescope Network (LCOGT), the Magdalena Ridge Observatory, the Mt. John Observatory, and a number of amateur observers across the globe to coordinate follow up of particular objects. The NEOWISE team was granted eight hours each semester of Target of Opportunity observing time on Gemini Observatory's Gemini South telescope (Hook et al. 2004) as well as time on the Blanco 4 m/Dark Energy Camera (DECam; Flaugher et al. 2015), and was granted Co-I status on the LCOGT NEO follow up program. Access to these facilities is vital for following up of discoveries deep in the southern hemisphere.

Figure 1 is a histogram of the observatories and campaigns that contributed the majority of follow up observations occurring immediately after NEOWISE reported candidate observations, including Spacewatch (McMillan 2007), with over 100 follow up observations, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network (Brown et al. 2013), and the Catalina Sky Survey (Christensen et al. 2015). Observers on Mauna Kea using the University of Hawaii 2.2 m telescope and the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope's Megacam imager repeatedly obtained follow up of objects under challenging observing conditions (e.g., Tholen et al. 2014). The Mt John University Observatory (observatory code 474) obtained valuable observations of 2015 OA22. NEOWISE discovered this object at −70° decl., and ephemerides showed it was moving further south. The Mt. John University Observatory was able to track the object to −78° decl., confirming the discovery.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. NEOWISE relies on ground-based observatories to perform targeted follow up of candidate NEO discoveries. This histogram shows numbers of follow up observations taken by different groups (listed by their MPC observatory codes) for NEOWISE discoveries during Year 1 and Year 2 of the Reactivation mission.

Standard image High-resolution image

NEOWISE submitted several candidate objects to the MPC that were not placed on the NEOCP based on an initial orbit determination that indicated they were not NEOs. These did not receive targeted follow up. Fifty-seven non-NEO NEOWISE discoveries made during the Reactivation mission do not have associated orbits. Additionally, there were eight objects (MBAs, Hungarias, and Mars-crossers) detected solely by NEOWISE that were given provisional designations by the MPC; all of these objects have poorly determined orbits. Without well determined orbits, distance at observing time cannot be computed accurately, and therefore diameters were not determined for these objects.

2.1. Comets

The NEOWISE Reactivation mission has detected over 100 comets, including 8 discoveries (4 of which were made after the end of the second year of observations). The NEOWISE spacecraft is sensitive to the presence of coma dust, as well as the CO-line (4.67 μm) and CO2-line (4.23 μm) emission from comet comae from gas species which are obscured or completely blocked by Earth's atmosphere (Figure 2). Analysis of the excess emission at 3.4 μm by Bauer et al. (2015) provided CO+CO2 production rates and limits of the first four comets discovered by the NEOWISE Reactivation mission.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Comet C/2013 US10 (Catalina) as seen by NEOWISE on 2015 August 28. The two-color image maps the 3.4 μm band to the cyan, and the 4.6 μm band to the red. The image is a quarter-degree on a side and is oriented approximately with north down and east to the left. The red appearance suggests the comet may have significant CO or CO2 emission.

Standard image High-resolution image

The infrared wavelengths provide a thermal emission and reflected light dust signal that can characterize a unique regime of dust particle sizes through the analysis of the dust coma morphologies (Kramer et al. 2015). The NEOWISE multi-epoch observations of many of the comets detected so far provide characterization of long-term cometary behavior regarding these aspects of dust and gas emission. The gas and dust properties of the Reactivation Year 1 and 2 survey comet sample will be described in a later work.

3. METHODS

3.1. Extraction of Detections

The methodology for extracting detections of minor planets from the NEOWISE source lists, as well as methods of diameter and albedo computation, follows the description in Nugent et al. (2015), with the one exception described in Section 3.2. As was done in that work, the NEOWISE source lists were searched using the positions and times reported for each minor planet in the MPC's archival files NumObs.txt and UnnObs.txt.5 NEOWISE reports detections to the MPC three times a week. By querying the MPC archive after the conclusion of Year 2 operations, we restrict our analysis to those detections of minor planets that were reported to and confirmed by the MPC.

These detections were converted into IRSA Catalog Query Engine format6 , and were used to query the NEOWISE-R Single-Exposure Level 1b (L1b) Source Table, which is served by the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive (IRSA). The NEOWISE Reactivation data are described in detail in the NEOWISE Reactivation Explanatory Supplement (Cutri et al. 2015), which was updated in 2016 March to include single-exposure images and extracted source products from Reactivation Year 2. The Single-Exposure (L1b) Source table was queried to find sources within 2 arcseconds of the reported position in the MPC files. For this query, detection time is constrained to be within two seconds of the reported time. The resulting table is a list of all sources corresponding to reported MPC detections from single exposures, with associated MPC designations for each detection.

Several steps are taken to prevent confusion of small-body detections with fixed background sources such as stars and galaxies. We reference the WISE All-Sky Source Catalog, which is derived from a co-add of multiple exposures, covering the sky. This is a significantly deeper image than the individual L1b images, and pixel outlier rejection suppresses moving solar system objects. Therefore, it is useful for identifying fixed sources in the L1b images. The WISE Moving Object Pipeline System (WMOPS), which identifies moving objects in the NEOWISE images, compares single-exposure detections to reference images before any detections are submitted to the MPC. However, as an additional precaution, we also compare the single-exposure detection list to the All-Sky Catalog. Any single-exposure detections found to be within 6.5 arcseconds (the size of the 3.4 and 4.6 μm NEOWISE point-spread function) of a WISE All-Sky Source Catalog source with SNR ≥ 3 were removed.

The resulting asteroid detection table was then stripped of measurements with associated poor quality flags. Each NEOWISE detection is graded for quality, as described in Cutri et al. (2015). Detections with "ph_qual" values of "A," "B," or "C" were accepted, and this photometric quality grade ensures that the source was detected in the band with a flux signal-to-noise ratio <2. Additionally, detections must have "cc_flags" values of "0" or "p," indicating that either the source was unaffected by known artifacts ("0"), or perhaps is impacted by a latent image left by a bright source ("p"). The value of "p" is conservative; it indicates the source is likely unaffected by a latent image, but possibly may be slightly contaminated. Finally, only frames graded "qual_frame" = "10" or highest quality by the quality assurance process were used.

The WISE Science Data System pipeline profile-fitting magnitudes are used for each band (Cutri et al. 2015). A minimum of three detections with measurement uncertainties σmag ≤ 0.25 mag were required for thermal fits. Saturated detections, with a W1 magnitude ≤8.0 or a W2 magnitude ≤7.0, were discarded. The photometric measurements used for each asteroid are listed in Table 3.

Table 3.  NEOWISE Magnitudes for the NEAs Modeled in this Paper

Object MJD W1 (mag) W2 (mag)
01580 57059.5362951 14.638 ± 0.074 11.338 ± 0.024
01580 57059.7989937 14.540 ± 0.068 11.339 ± 0.024
01580 57059.9304065 14.564 ± 0.076 11.274 ± 0.025
01580 57060.0618195 14.525 ± 0.084 11.290 ± 0.028
01580 57162.4156505 11.563 ± 0.017 8.478 ± 0.015
01580 57162.4812294 11.507 ± 0.017 8.436 ± 0.012
01580 57162.5468084 11.586 ± 0.018 8.497 ± 0.013
01580 57162.6780938 11.527 ± 0.019 8.436 ± 0.014
01580 57162.8092518 11.449 ± 0.017 8.388 ± 0.013
01580 57163.2684322 11.724 ± 0.018 8.624 ± 0.015
01580 57163.5308722 11.825 ± 0.021 8.695 ± 0.014
01580 57163.5309995 11.836 ± 0.021 8.443 ± 0.014
01580 57163.7933154 11.879 ± 0.019 8.803 ± 0.013
01580 57163.9246007 11.808 ± 0.021 8.737 ± 0.013
01580 57164.1213378 11.317 ± 0.017 8.222 ± 0.013
01580 57164.3837815 11.406 ± 0.021 8.286 ± 0.015
01580 57164.7772554 11.442 ± 0.021 8.373 ± 0.015
01580 57164.8429617 11.566 ± 0.021 8.512 ± 0.013
01580 57164.9741197 11.507 ± 0.019 8.381 ± 0.012
01580 57165.1052777 11.417 ± 0.020 8.371 ± 0.014
01580 57165.2364356 11.388 ± 0.026 8.330 ± 0.014
01580 57165.2365629 11.432 ± 0.021 8.316 ± 0.012
01580 57189.9632607 12.328 ± 0.023 9.224 ± 0.014
01580 57190.0288402 12.292 ± 0.023 9.209 ± 0.013
01580 57190.0944191 12.292 ± 0.026 9.204 ± 0.015
01580 57190.1601254 12.022 ± 0.028 8.925 ± 0.012
01580 57190.2257043 12.318 ± 0.028 9.243 ± 0.014
01580 57190.2912832 12.307 ± 0.022 9.198 ± 0.014
01580 57190.3568621 12.424 ± 0.025 9.268 ± 0.015
01620 57259.6667067 14.743 ± 0.082 12.908 ± 0.061
01620 57259.7979924 14.789 ± 0.104 12.701 ± 0.055
01620 57259.9291508 15.247 ± 0.130 13.368 ± 0.099
01620 57260.0603091 15.713 ± 0.177 13.865 ± 0.138
01620 57260.2570466 15.336 ± 0.134 13.066 ± 0.071
01620 57260.2571739 15.263 ± 0.125 13.355 ± 0.092
01620 57260.3227531 14.641 ± 0.075 12.867 ± 0.067
01620 57260.3883323 15.517 ± 0.150 13.546 ± 0.158
01620 57260.4539115 14.675 ± 0.079 12.747 ± 0.067
01620 57260.5850698 14.916 ± 0.091 13.053 ± 0.069
01620 57260.7818073 14.934 ± 0.108 12.796 ± 0.060
01620 57260.913093 15.390 ± 0.135 13.504 ± 0.114
01620 57261.1754097 15.203 ± 0.115 13.108 ± 0.070

Note.  Listed are MPC packed name, the time of the observation in modified Julian date (MJD), and the magnitude in the 3.4 μm (W1) and 4.6 μm bands (W2). Non-detections at a particular wavelength represent 95% confidence limits (Cutri et al. 2012). Observations for the first two objects only are shown; the remainder are available in electronic format through the journal website.

Only a portion of this table is shown here to demonstrate its form and content. A machine-readable version of the full table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset image

3.2. H and G Values

For each diameter, a corresponding albedo is also calculated using an absolute visual magnitude H and IAU phase slope parameter G (Bowell et al. 1989, p. 524). Therefore, the accuracy of albedos calculated from diameter measurements depends on the accuracy H and G values. The MPC provides H and G values as part of its catalog service; however, the default catalog values may be affected by various systematic effects (Williams 2012; Vereš et al. 2015). Known issues include values calculated from observations submitted with uncertain photometric calibrations and a bias toward discovering asteroids when their longest axis faces Earth (Jedicke et al. 2002, pp. 71–87).

Corrected or newly derived H and G values have been published by Warner et al. (2009), Pravec et al. (2012), Williams (2012), and Vereš et al. (2015). The largest of these H and G data sets is from Williams (2012) with ∼337,000 numbered asteroids, and Vereš et al. (2015) with ∼250,000 objects observed by Pan-STARRS PS1. The Williams (2012) data set is slated to be incorporated into the MPC catalog (G. Williams 2016, private communication). For this reason, and because it is more extensive, we used these corrected H and G values in this work when they were available for the asteroids in our sample. This is a departure from the methods in Nugent et al. (2015), which employed MPC database H and G values as no large replacement data set was available at that time. Unless specified otherwise, G is assumed to be 0.15 ± 0.1 mag, and the errors in H are assumed to be ±0.3 mag.

3.3. Diameter and Albedo calculations

The effective diameter d of each asteroid and geometric optical albedo pv were then calculated from the resulting verified, high-quality minor planet measurements using the Near-Earth Asteroid Thermal Model (NEATM; Harris 1998). The implementation used in this work is detailed in Mainzer et al. (2011c). It assumes a spherical object with no rotation, no nightside emission, and a temperature distribution given by

Equation (1)

where θ is the angular distance from the sub-solar point. Tmax is the sub-solar temperature, defined as

Equation (2)

where A is the bolometric Bond albedo, S is the solar flux at the asteroid, η is the beaming parameter, epsilon is the emissivity, and σ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant. The beaming parameter η adjusts the temperature distribution, and variation of η can be due to non-spherical shapes, rotation rates, spin pole orientation with respect to observer, surface thermal inertia, phase effects, etc.

After a best-fit diameter is found, 25 Monte Carlo trials were run to evaluate the errors introduced by the uncertainty in the flux measurements. The corresponding uncertainties in diameter and albedo, along with the H and G values used as inputs to the thermal model, are reported in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4.  Measured Diameters (d) and Albedos (pV) of Near-Earth Asteroids Observed During the NEOWISE Year 2 Mission

Object Packed H G d (km) pV η pIR/pV W2 amp. nW1 nW2
1580 01580 14.90 0.12 7.91 ± 0.08 0.03 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.31 ± 0.10 0.07 4 4
1580 01580 14.90 0.12 4.19 ± 0.06 0.11 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 1.03 ± 0.10 0.34 7 7
1580 01580 14.90 0.12 5.37 ± 0.04 0.07 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.61 ± 0.10 0.58 18 18
1620 01620 15.41 0.24 1.96 ± 0.06 0.32 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.78 ± 0.10 1.16 13 13
1685 01685 14.45 0.24 3.91 ± 0.08 0.19 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 1.68 ± 0.10 1.04 10 11
1980 01980 13.87 0.24 4.36 ± 0.10 0.26 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.83 ± 0.10 0.99 18 18
1980 01980 13.87 0.24 4.31 ± 0.18 0.27 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.00 1.94 ± 0.10 1.36 31 31
1980 01980 13.87 0.24 4.47 ± 0.14 0.25 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.00 1.97 ± 0.10 1.46 27 29
2062 02062 17.30 0.24 0.73 ± 0.03 0.39 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.00 1.46 ± 0.10 0.25 6 6
2063 02063 17.37 0.24 1.03 ± 0.03 0.19 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 0.93 ± 0.10 0.24 5 5
3691 03691 14.98 0.24 2.08 ± 0.09 0.42 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.00 1.19 ± 0.10 0.73 21 21
4055 04055 14.99 0.43 3.21 ± 0.16 0.17 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.70 ± 0.10 0.91 6 7
4183 04183 14.35 0.24 3.73 ± 0.15 0.23 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.21 ± 0.10 0.33 9 9
5646 05646 15.45 0.24 2.45 ± 0.06 0.19 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.32 ± 0.10 0.36 39 39
5646 05646 15.45 0.24 2.50 ± 0.05 0.19 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.28 ± 0.10 0.66 74 78
5646 05646 15.45 0.24 2.51 ± 0.05 0.18 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.41 ± 0.10 0.35 46 47
5731 05731 15.53 0.12 6.51 ± 3.14 0.03 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.51 1.60 ± 0.10 0.33 0 8
5828 05828 16.30 0.24 1.43 ± 0.06 0.26 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.00 1.29 ± 0.10 0.38 6 6
7335 07335 17.82 0.24 0.73 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.52 ± 0.10 0.78 8 8
7350 07350 17.21 0.24 1.92 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.06 ± 0.10 0.12 4 5
7889 07889 15.31 0.24 1.82 ± 0.08 0.40 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.27 ± 0.10 0.77 13 13
9202 09202 16.16 0.24 1.51 ± 0.05 0.27 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.29 ± 0.10 0.18 5 6
9400 09400 14.98 0.24 3.69 ± 0.05 0.13 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 2.13 ± 0.10 0.20 10 10
11066 11066 15.36 0.24 2.10 ± 0.09 0.29 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.83 ± 0.10 0.49 5 5
11405 11405 15.37 0.24 3.62 ± 0.05 0.10 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 2.67 ± 0.10 0.25 13 13
21088 21088 14.47 0.24 2.79 ± 0.10 0.37 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.00 1.63 ± 0.10 0.45 12 12
22099 22099 18.19 0.24 0.52 ± 0.11 0.35 ± 0.22 1.40 ± 0.40 1.60 ± 0.10 0.81 0 4
23606 23606 18.37 0.24 0.87 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 2.46 ± 0.10 1.67 60 60
26817 26817 19.11 0.24 1.17 ± 0.53 0.03 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.52 1.60 ± 0.10 0.41 0 6
35107 35107 17.02 0.24 0.91 ± 0.03 0.33 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.41 ± 0.10 0.93 27 27
38086 38086 17.63 0.24 0.64 ± 0.19 0.39 ± 0.25 1.40 ± 0.50 1.60 ± 0.10 0.71 0 6
38091 38091 16.61 0.24 2.49 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.30 ± 0.10 0.97 12 13
52750 52750 16.74 0.24 0.96 ± 0.04 0.39 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.00 1.55 ± 0.10 0.73 22 24
52750 52750 16.74 0.24 0.93 ± 0.32 0.41 ± 0.25 1.40 ± 0.51 1.60 ± 0.10 0.19 0 5
53430 53430 16.85 0.24 1.34 ± 0.45 0.18 ± 0.17 1.40 ± 0.44 1.60 ± 0.10 0.78 0 10
68216 68216 16.66 0.24 0.99 ± 0.04 0.39 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.00 1.30 ± 0.10 0.38 8 8
68278 68278 18.50 0.12 1.46 ± 0.53 0.03 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.40 1.60 ± 0.10 0.52 0 23
85275 85275 16.45 0.24 2.50 ± 0.99 0.07 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 0.53 0 14
85713 85713 16.01 0.24 3.03 ± 1.49 0.08 ± 0.12 1.40 ± 0.50 1.60 ± 0.10 0.37 0 6
85804 85804 15.47 0.24 2.27 ± 0.06 0.22 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.24 ± 0.10 0.17 11 11
85804 85804 15.47 0.24 2.19 ± 0.04 0.24 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 1.29 ± 0.10 0.21 13 14
85804 85804 15.47 0.24 2.84 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 1.94 ± 0.10 0.58 21 22
85989 85989 17.03 0.24 1.60 ± 0.59 0.11 ± 0.17 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.39 0 4
86067 86067 16.52 0.24 1.50 ± 0.49 0.19 ± 0.14 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 0.54 0 11
86667 86667 17.59 0.24 0.74 ± 0.02 0.29 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.00 1.60 ± 0.10 0.76 4 4
86829 86829 16.11 0.24 1.81 ± 0.05 0.19 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.38 ± 0.10 0.13 6 6
88263 88263 15.73 0.24 5.10 ± 1.86 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.38 1.60 ± 0.10 0.93 0 18
88710 88710 18.14 0.34 0.75 ± 0.29 0.18 ± 0.14 1.40 ± 0.52 1.60 ± 0.10 0.99 0 71
90367 90367 18.11 0.24 2.06 ± 1.14 0.02 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.59 1.60 ± 0.10 0.48 0 13
90403 90403 17.78 0.24 0.57 ± 0.17 0.42 ± 0.24 1.40 ± 0.49 1.60 ± 0.10 0.49 0 5
90416 90416 18.58 0.24 0.98 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.34 ± 0.10 0.07 5 5
100756 A0756 16.48 0.24 1.81 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 1.80 ± 0.10 1.16 15 15
105140 A5140 15.81 0.24 1.97 ± 0.05 0.22 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.30 ± 0.10 0.58 8 9
108519 A8519 17.94 0.24 1.43 ± 0.54 0.06 ± 0.09 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.52 0 12
112985 B2985 15.66 0.24 3.65 ± 0.04 0.07 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.46 ± 0.10 0.12 11 11
112985 B2985 15.66 0.24 5.12 ± 0.03 0.04 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.80 ± 0.10 0.15 18 18
137084 D7084 16.52 0.24 1.23 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.10 ± 0.10 0.48 4 4
137805 D7805 16.77 0.24 2.24 ± 0.03 0.07 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.10 0.31 17 17
137925 D7925 16.25 0.24 1.36 ± 0.04 0.30 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.00 1.27 ± 0.10 0.29 4 5
140288 E0288 16.84 0.24 1.26 ± 0.03 0.20 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.03 ± 0.10 0.34 8 8
140288 E0288 16.84 0.24 1.21 ± 0.45 0.22 ± 0.23 1.40 ± 0.50 1.60 ± 0.10 0.74 0 5
141484 E1484 16.64 0.24 1.00 ± 0.04 0.39 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.00 1.44 ± 0.10 0.26 8 9
141484 E1484 16.64 0.24 1.02 ± 0.03 0.37 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.59 ± 0.10 0.39 16 16
142040 E2040 16.31 0.24 1.26 ± 0.04 0.34 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.71 ± 0.10 0.36 43 44
152679 F2679 16.43 0.12 4.18 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 7.21 ± 0.10 1.22 29 29
152978 F2978 19.73 0.24 0.32 ± 0.07 0.23 ± 0.13 1.40 ± 0.32 1.60 ± 0.10 0.74 0 8
152978 F2978 19.73 0.24 0.37 ± 0.14 0.17 ± 0.14 1.40 ± 0.47 1.60 ± 0.10 0.57 0 5
153195 F3195 17.94 0.24 1.32 ± 0.55 0.07 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.47 1.60 ± 0.10 0.77 0 14
153195 F3195 17.94 0.24 1.60 ± 0.59 0.05 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.39 1.60 ± 0.10 0.45 0 7
154807 F4807 18.72 0.24 0.47 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.69 ± 0.10 0.92 14 15
155110 F5110 17.66 0.24 0.68 ± 0.03 0.33 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.87 ± 0.10 0.34 6 6
155110 F5110 17.66 0.24 0.75 ± 0.32 0.27 ± 0.23 1.40 ± 0.54 1.60 ± 0.10 0.37 0 5
159459 F9459 15.98 0.24 1.83 ± 0.09 0.21 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.11 ± 0.10 0.38 5 6
159504 F9504 16.99 0.05 2.31 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.73 ± 0.10 0.24 9 9
159686 F9686 16.65 0.24 1.80 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 3.56 ± 0.10 0.28 8 9
159929 F9929 17.75 0.24 2.62 ± 1.20 0.02 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.34 0 8
161989 G1989 17.43 0.24 0.64 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.09 1.40 ± 0.00 1.81 ± 0.10 1.16 64 69
162080 G2080 19.89 0.24 0.68 ± 0.32 0.04 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.55 1.60 ± 0.10 0.94 0 20
162463 G2463 17.99 0.24 0.93 ± 0.35 0.13 ± 0.21 1.40 ± 0.49 1.60 ± 0.10 0.85 0 21
162463 G2463 17.99 0.24 0.98 ± 0.35 0.12 ± 0.14 1.40 ± 0.43 1.60 ± 0.10 0.40 0 6
162567 G2567 20.18 0.24 0.29 ± 0.12 0.18 ± 0.16 1.40 ± 0.56 1.60 ± 0.10 0.19 0 5
163760 G3760 16.53 0.24 2.35 ± 0.77 0.08 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.39 1.60 ± 0.10 0.40 0 9
163899 G3899 17.36 0.24 0.80 ± 0.02 0.31 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.00 1.35 ± 0.10 1.97 24 24
164206 G4206 17.86 0.24 1.13 ± 0.55 0.10 ± 0.09 1.40 ± 0.55 1.60 ± 0.10 0.94 0 8
172034 H2034 17.67 0.24 0.66 ± 0.17 0.34 ± 0.25 1.40 ± 0.44 1.60 ± 0.10 1.17 0 24
173689 H3689 18.28 0.24 0.73 ± 0.29 0.16 ± 0.19 1.40 ± 0.55 1.60 ± 0.10 0.17 0 5
190161 J0161 16.67 0.24 3.05 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.79 ± 0.10 0.36 28 30
200754 K0754 18.67 0.24 0.56 ± 0.21 0.19 ± 0.15 1.40 ± 0.52 1.60 ± 0.10 0.29 0 5
206378 K6378 18.68 0.06 0.37 ± 0.02 0.44 ± 0.19 1.40 ± 0.00 1.85 ± 0.10 0.75 20 20
212359 L2359 16.98 0.24 1.25 ± 0.40 0.18 ± 0.18 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 0.33 0 9
237805 N7805 17.63 0.24 0.69 ± 0.26 0.33 ± 0.22 1.40 ± 0.57 1.60 ± 0.10 1.47 0 45
241662 O1662 17.64 0.24 0.91 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.56 ± 0.10 0.38 10 10
241662 O1662 17.64 0.24 0.81 ± 0.26 0.24 ± 0.22 1.40 ± 0.47 1.60 ± 0.10 0.44 0 8
248590 O8590 16.82 0.24 3.35 ± 1.04 0.03 ± 0.03 0.80 ± 0.40 1.50 ± 0.10 0.27 0 13
256412 P6412 17.17 0.24 2.90 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.01 1.00 ± 0.20 4.06 ± 0.10 0.57 15 15
275611 R5611 18.24 0.24 1.48 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.67 ± 0.10 0.70 24 25
276049 R6049 16.50 0.12 2.24 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.02 1.00 ± 0.20 0.23 ± 0.10 0.24 11 11
276049 R6049 16.50 0.12 4.71 ± 2.84 0.02 ± 0.04 1.00 ± 0.60 1.60 ± 0.10 0.37 0 12
276786 R6786 18.11 0.24 1.72 ± 0.68 0.03 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.85 0 12
285331 S5331 18.47 0.24 0.66 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 2.04 ± 0.10 0.32 6 6
285331 S5331 18.47 0.24 0.65 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 1.96 ± 0.10 0.65 10 10
294739 T4739 17.39 0.24 0.74 ± 0.21 0.36 ± 0.19 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.35 0 7
297274 T7274 16.90 0.24 1.21 ± 0.03 0.21 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 1.01 ± 0.10 0.64 5 5
303450 U3450 20.86 0.24 0.18 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.12 1.40 ± 0.43 1.60 ± 0.10 0.62 0 7
307493 U7493 18.95 0.24 1.43 ± 0.09 0.02 ± 0.00 1.22 ± 0.06 1.60 ± 0.10 0.34 10 10
311554 V1554 18.80 0.24 0.38 ± 0.02 0.36 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.00 2.07 ± 0.10 0.72 7 8
326388 W6388 18.26 0.24 1.15 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 0.70 ± 0.10 0.39 11 12
337248 X7248 20.00 0.15 0.85 ± 0.06 0.02 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.09 4.79 ± 0.10 1.01 6 6
337248 X7248 20.00 0.15 0.61 ± 0.26 0.05 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.49 1.60 ± 0.10 0.34 0 7
345646 Y5646 19.90 0.15 0.41 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 8.52 ± 0.10 0.42 6 7
355770 Z5770 18.40 0.15 1.20 ± 0.49 0.05 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.48 1.60 ± 0.10 1.68 0 57
363027 a3027 19.50 0.15 0.58 ± 0.27 0.08 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.54 1.60 ± 0.10 0.30 0 4
363027 a3027 19.50 0.15 0.69 ± 0.25 0.06 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.19 0 6
363505 a3505 18.10 0.15 1.88 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 2.63 ± 0.10 0.70 26 28
373135 b3135 19.50 0.15 1.05 ± 0.36 0.03 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.38 1.60 ± 0.10 0.88 0 4
381906 c1906 17.90 0.15 0.52 ± 0.10 0.45 ± 0.27 1.40 ± 0.39 1.60 ± 0.10 0.43 0 5
385186 c5186 17.70 0.15 0.81 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 2.04 ± 0.10 0.57 9 9
385186 c5186 17.70 0.15 0.97 ± 0.29 0.16 ± 0.15 1.40 ± 0.41 1.60 ± 0.10 0.43 0 20
401857 e1857 16.10 0.15 4.28 ± 0.04 0.03 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.28 ± 0.10 0.43 6 6
401857 e1857 16.10 0.15 3.90 ± 1.87 0.04 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.47 1.60 ± 0.10 0.78 0 11
401925 e1925 18.40 0.15 0.48 ± 0.10 0.34 ± 0.19 1.40 ± 0.37 1.60 ± 0.10 0.43 0 5
413123 f3123 19.00 0.15 1.22 ± 0.50 0.03 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.89 0 29
413123 f3123 19.00 0.15 1.26 ± 0.52 0.03 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.44 0 12
413192 f3192 16.80 0.15 2.78 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.31 ± 0.10 0.33 23 25
413192 f3192 16.80 0.15 2.16 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.49 ± 0.10 0.84 114 118
414287 f4287 17.70 0.15 1.97 ± 0.74 0.04 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.41 1.60 ± 0.10 0.57 0 9
414772 f4772 19.00 0.15 1.00 ± 0.68 0.04 ± 0.06 1.00 ± 0.73 1.60 ± 0.10 0.95 0 5
415711 f5711 19.00 0.15 0.35 ± 0.10 0.37 ± 0.26 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.66 0 9
415986 f5986 18.10 0.15 1.07 ± 0.54 0.09 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.57 1.60 ± 0.10 0.50 0 10
415986 f5986 18.10 0.15 1.08 ± 0.29 0.09 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.33 1.60 ± 0.10 0.87 0 27
416071 f6071 17.90 0.15 0.80 ± 0.01 0.19 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 2.24 ± 0.10 0.33 8 8
417264 f7264 17.20 0.15 1.93 ± 0.02 0.06 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.16 ± 0.10 0.68 15 15
417264 f7264 17.20 0.15 1.93 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.59 ± 0.10 0.88 27 27
417264 f7264 17.20 0.15 2.72 ± 1.26 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.43 1.60 ± 0.10 0.84 0 11
418797 f8797 19.50 0.15 0.79 ± 0.23 0.05 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.36 1.60 ± 0.10 0.39 0 7
422699 g2699 18.30 0.15 0.62 ± 0.24 0.22 ± 0.18 1.40 ± 0.52 1.60 ± 0.10 0.97 0 11
424089 g4089 17.70 0.15 2.31 ± 0.72 0.03 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.32 1.60 ± 0.10 0.49 0 11
424392 g4392 21.90 0.15 0.24 ± 0.10 0.05 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.49 1.60 ± 0.10 0.46 0 9
428223 g8223 16.10 0.15 2.53 ± 0.82 0.10 ± 0.13 1.40 ± 0.37 1.60 ± 0.10 0.67 0 10
429746 g9746 17.30 0.15 1.27 ± 0.50 0.13 ± 0.10 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 0.55 0 8
431107 h1107 17.70 0.15 1.27 ± 0.44 0.09 ± 0.15 1.40 ± 0.43 1.60 ± 0.10 0.66 0 8
433953 h3953 20.90 0.15 0.26 ± 0.09 0.11 ± 0.13 1.40 ± 0.44 1.60 ± 0.10 0.80 0 7
433992 h3992 18.00 0.15 0.88 ± 0.02 0.14 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.00 2.52 ± 0.10 0.38 5 5
434096 h4096 18.00 0.15 0.53 ± 0.02 0.43 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.00 2.32 ± 0.10 0.82 4 6
434633 h4633 20.90 0.15 0.31 ± 0.12 0.08 ± 0.09 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.31 0 6
434633 h4633 20.90 0.15 0.44 ± 0.14 0.04 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.37 1.60 ± 0.10 0.37 0 13
436671 h6671 18.00 0.15 2.16 ± 0.02 0.02 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 4.24 ± 0.10 0.44 7 7
437879 h7879 17.70 0.15 2.24 ± 0.95 0.03 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.87 0 13
437994 h7994 17.30 0.15 0.80 ± 0.21 0.33 ± 0.16 1.40 ± 0.38 1.60 ± 0.10 0.87 0 11
438990 h8990 18.30 0.15 0.82 ± 0.37 0.13 ± 0.16 1.40 ± 0.53 1.60 ± 0.10 0.48 0 5
439889 h9889 20.10 0.15 0.59 ± 0.18 0.05 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.38 1.60 ± 0.10 0.31 0 4
442605 i2605 19.10 0.15 0.44 ± 0.11 0.21 ± 0.17 1.40 ± 0.37 1.60 ± 0.10 0.50 0 5
442742 i2742 17.60 0.15 2.00 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 2.83 ± 0.10 0.92 71 78
443806 i3806 22.00 0.15 0.29 ± 0.12 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.52 1.60 ± 0.10 0.24 0 12
443880 i3880 19.40 0.15 0.25 ± 0.04 0.50 ± 0.17 1.80 ± 0.55 1.60 ± 0.10 0.65 0 6
443923 i3923 17.40 0.15 2.15 ± 1.01 0.04 ± 0.07 1.00 ± 0.58 1.60 ± 0.10 0.52 0 11
445025 i5025 17.50 0.15 2.10 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 0.70 ± 0.10 0.09 5 5
445305 i5305 19.90 0.15 0.80 ± 0.31 0.03 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.20 0 4
450159 j0159 18.90 0.15 0.73 ± 0.23 0.09 ± 0.10 1.40 ± 0.40 1.60 ± 0.10 0.62 0 5
453687 j3687 19.30 0.15 1.06 ± 0.48 0.03 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.47 1.60 ± 0.10 0.25 0 13
453707 j3707 18.60 0.15 0.50 ± 0.14 0.26 ± 0.12 1.40 ± 0.39 1.60 ± 0.10 0.40 0 4
454078 j4078 17.50 0.15 2.96 ± 1.20 0.02 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.44 1.60 ± 0.10 0.23 0 15
454100 j4100 20.10 0.15 0.55 ± 0.01 0.05 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.70 ± 0.10 0.26 6 6
2002 GP186 K02GI6P 20.30 0.15 0.17 ± 0.05 0.44 ± 0.27 1.40 ± 0.48 1.60 ± 0.10 0.29 0 5
2003 KZ18 K03K18Z 21.20 0.15 0.47 ± 0.19 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.48 1.60 ± 0.10 0.69 0 6
2003 MT9 K03M09T 18.60 0.15 0.68 ± 0.22 0.14 ± 0.17 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.30 0 4
2006 KL89 K06K89L 18.60 0.15 0.96 ± 0.38 0.07 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.41 1.60 ± 0.10 0.68 0 23
2006 KL89 K06K89L 18.60 0.15 1.07 ± 0.52 0.06 ± 0.10 1.40 ± 0.53 1.60 ± 0.10 0.65 0 15
2006 OF5 K06O05F 19.30 0.15 0.95 ± 0.55 0.04 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.64 1.60 ± 0.10 0.63 0 46
2006 OF5 K06O05F 19.30 0.15 0.93 ± 0.32 0.04 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.49 1.60 ± 0.10 0.43 0 47
2006 UR217 K06UL7R 19.80 0.15 0.89 ± 0.07 0.03 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.11 6.16 ± 0.10 0.26 8 9
2006 UR217 K06UL7R 19.80 0.15 0.95 ± 0.40 0.02 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.47 1.60 ± 0.10 0.44 0 6
2007 WE55 K07W55E 20.20 0.15 0.69 ± 0.18 0.03 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.33 1.60 ± 0.10 0.78 0 13
2010 CO1 K10C01O 21.80 0.15 0.29 ± 0.15 0.04 ± 0.06 1.00 ± 0.67 1.60 ± 0.10 0.43 0 13
2010 LF86 K10L86F 17.20 0.15 2.56 ± 1.22 0.04 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.50 1.60 ± 0.10 0.49 0 5
2010 UB8 K10U08B 19.60 0.15 0.92 ± 0.08 0.03 ± 0.01 1.16 ± 0.09 1.60 ± 0.10 0.16 7 7
2010 UB8 K10U08B 19.60 0.15 0.88 ± 0.42 0.03 ± 0.05 1.00 ± 0.61 1.60 ± 0.10 0.37 0 15
2010 YD3 K10Y03D 20.00 0.15 0.76 ± 0.35 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.52 1.60 ± 0.10 0.54 0 12
2011 AM24 K11A24M 20.50 0.15 0.50 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.01 0.47 ± 0.10 0.49 8 8
2011 AM24 K11A24M 20.50 0.15 0.51 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.01 0.94 ± 0.10 0.47 14 15
2011 HJ61 K11H61J 19.30 0.15 1.28 ± 0.57 0.02 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.47 1.60 ± 0.10 0.97 0 13
2011 JU2 K11J02U 18.40 0.15 1.49 ± 0.56 0.03 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 0.77 0 4
2011 OL5 K11O05L 20.20 0.15 0.28 ± 0.08 0.19 ± 0.16 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 1.05 0 36
2011 OL5 K11O05L 20.20 0.15 0.28 ± 0.11 0.19 ± 0.16 1.40 ± 0.51 1.60 ± 0.10 0.60 0 13
2011 VQ5 K11V05Q 20.10 0.15 0.56 ± 0.23 0.05 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.50 1.60 ± 0.10 0.85 0 18
2011 YB40 K11Y40B 19.10 0.15 0.42 ± 0.12 0.22 ± 0.17 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 0.38 0 5
2012 OD1 K12O01D 18.60 0.15 0.35 ± 0.09 0.54 ± 0.26 1.40 ± 0.44 1.60 ± 0.10 0.36 0 5
2014 JY24 K14J24Y 18.30 0.15 1.92 ± 1.01 0.02 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.55 1.60 ± 0.10 0.37 0 15
2014 QK434 K14Qh4K 19.10 0.15 0.30 ± 0.01 0.46 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.00 0.83 ± 0.10 0.41 5 5
2014 TA36 K14T36A 20.70 0.15 0.55 ± 0.23 0.03 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.49 1.60 ± 0.10 0.69 0 11
2014 US K14U00S 19.10 0.15 0.47 ± 0.15 0.19 ± 0.26 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.30 0 16
2014 US K14U00S 19.10 0.15 0.56 ± 0.19 0.13 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 0.38 0 14
2014 UV33 K14U33V 17.90 0.15 0.82 ± 0.02 0.18 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.00 3.29 ± 0.10 1.58 20 24
2014 UF206 K14UK6F 18.80 0.15 1.52 ± 0.68 0.02 ± 0.02 1.00 ± 0.53 1.60 ± 0.10 0.68 0 46
2014 UF206 K14UK6F 18.80 0.15 1.29 ± 0.06 0.03 ± 0.01 1.12 ± 0.05 1.60 ± 0.10 0.16 23 23
2014 WF365 K14Wa5F 17.20 0.15 2.18 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.00 1.39 ± 0.10 0.20 7 7
2014 XR6 K14X06R 18.30 0.15 0.86 ± 0.29 0.11 ± 0.17 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.56 0 10
2014 XX31 K14X31X 17.50 0.15 1.49 ± 0.53 0.08 ± 0.06 1.40 ± 0.39 1.60 ± 0.10 0.67 0 6
2014 YJ14 K14Y14J 18.30 0.15 1.91 ± 0.12 0.02 ± 0.01 1.12 ± 0.06 1.60 ± 0.10 0.12 7 7
2014 YS14 K14Y14S 21.10 0.15 0.30 ± 0.12 0.07 ± 0.09 1.40 ± 0.51 1.60 ± 0.10 0.57 0 5
2014 YT14 K14Y14T 18.90 0.15 1.16 ± 0.47 0.04 ± 0.02 1.00 ± 0.52 1.60 ± 0.10 0.95 0 18
2014 YS34 K14Y34S 20.80 0.15 0.13 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.23 1.40 ± 0.41 1.60 ± 0.10 0.46 0 5
2014 YB35 K14Y35B 19.00 0.15 0.28 ± 0.01 0.57 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.00 1.31 ± 0.10 0.52 6 6
2014 YR43 K14Y43R 19.50 0.15 0.37 ± 0.13 0.20 ± 0.13 1.40 ± 0.47 1.60 ± 0.10 0.36 0 9
2015 AC17 K15A17C 19.90 0.15 0.67 ± 0.28 0.04 ± 0.04 1.00 ± 0.57 1.60 ± 0.10 0.67 0 34
2015 AY245 K15AO5Y 21.20 0.15 0.37 ± 0.03 0.04 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.12 8.64 ± 0.10 0.43 13 13
2015 AY245 K15AO5Y 21.20 0.15 0.39 ± 0.18 0.04 ± 0.09 1.40 ± 0.59 1.60 ± 0.10 2.84 0 60
2015 AK280 K15AS0K 21.80 0.15 0.36 ± 0.12 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.41 1.60 ± 0.10 0.36 0 4
2015 BY516 K15Bp6Y 22.30 0.15 0.24 ± 0.12 0.04 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.64 1.60 ± 0.10 0.55 0 8
2015 CV13 K15C13V 20.30 0.15 0.44 ± 0.13 0.07 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.35 1.60 ± 0.10 0.69 0 8
2015 DE176 K15DH6E 19.70 0.15 0.68 ± 0.04 0.05 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.07 0.21 ± 0.10 0.19 9 9
2015 DE176 K15DH6E 19.70 0.15 0.57 ± 0.29 0.07 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.59 1.60 ± 0.10 0.25 0 4
2015 DX198 K15DJ8X 22.00 0.15 0.35 ± 0.10 0.02 ± 0.02 1.40 ± 0.38 1.60 ± 0.10 1.31 0 9
2015 EZ K15E00Z 20.30 0.15 0.19 ± 0.05 0.36 ± 0.19 1.40 ± 0.39 1.60 ± 0.10 0.62 0 10
2015 FZ35 K15F35Z 19.40 0.15 0.64 ± 0.21 0.08 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.41 1.60 ± 0.10 0.57 0 5
2015 FY117 K15FB7Y 21.30 0.15 0.38 ± 0.17 0.04 ± 0.04 1.00 ± 0.60 1.60 ± 0.10 0.62 0 43
2015 FH120 K15FC0H 18.70 0.15 0.75 ± 0.26 0.11 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.25 0 11
2015 FU332 K15FX2U 17.20 0.15 0.94 ± 0.36 0.26 ± 0.27 1.40 ± 0.53 1.60 ± 0.10 0.47 0 9
2015 FD341 K15FY1D 17.70 0.15 1.25 ± 0.48 0.09 ± 0.08 1.40 ± 0.43 1.60 ± 0.10 0.77 0 4
2015 FT344 K15FY4T 19.90 0.15 0.75 ± 0.24 0.03 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.39 1.60 ± 0.10 0.60 0 4
2015 FT344 K15FY4T 19.90 0.15 0.76 ± 0.21 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.34 1.60 ± 0.10 0.46 0 7
2015 GY K15G00Y 21.70 0.15 0.14 ± 0.05 0.18 ± 0.19 1.40 ± 0.50 1.60 ± 0.10 0.24 0 4
2015 GK50 K15G50K 20.60 0.15 0.61 ± 0.30 0.03 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.62 1.60 ± 0.10 0.48 0 9
2015 GK50 K15G50K 20.60 0.15 0.46 ± 0.03 0.05 ± 0.01 0.99 ± 0.06 1.60 ± 0.10 0.27 16 16
2015 GN50 K15G50N 20.20 0.15 0.29 ± 0.11 0.18 ± 0.12 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.36 0 5
2015 HF11 K15H11F 19.40 0.15 1.11 ± 0.44 0.02 ± 0.01 1.40 ± 0.42 1.60 ± 0.10 0.82 0 10
2015 JF11 K15J11F 21.20 0.15 0.17 ± 0.05 0.20 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.40 1.60 ± 0.10 0.34 0 6
2015 KH157 K15KF7H 20.00 0.15 0.58 ± 0.23 0.05 ± 0.11 1.40 ± 0.49 1.60 ± 0.10 0.22 0 9
2015 KL157 K15KF7L 19.10 0.15 1.45 ± 0.31 0.02 ± 0.01 1.00 ± 0.38 1.50 ± 0.10 0.76 0 48
2015 KL157 K15KF7L 19.10 0.15 0.36 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.05 0.40 ± 0.00 1.50 ± 0.10 1.05 9 12
2015 LK24 K15L24K 21.60 0.15 0.31 ± 0.11 0.04 ± 0.07 1.40 ± 0.44 1.60 ± 0.10 0.39 0 8
2015 MQ130 K15MD0Q 20.90 0.15 0.36 ± 0.07 0.06 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.10 1.60 ± 0.10 0.36 5 7
2015 MQ130 K15MD0Q 20.90 0.15 0.55 ± 0.26 0.03 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.61 1.60 ± 0.10 0.83 0 4
2015 NA14 K15N14A 22.00 0.15 0.09 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.18 1.40 ± 0.32 1.60 ± 0.10 0.45 0 5
2015 OA22 K15O22A 20.00 0.15 0.79 ± 0.34 0.03 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.56 1.60 ± 0.10 0.11 0 4
2015 OS35 K15O35S 19.10 0.15 1.26 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 5.95 ± 0.10 0.17 20 22
2015 OS35 K15O35S 19.10 0.15 1.42 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.00 6.34 ± 0.10 0.15 10 10
2015 PD K15P00D 19.30 0.15 0.62 ± 0.22 0.09 ± 0.10 1.40 ± 0.44 1.60 ± 0.10 0.57 0 8
2015 PM57 K15P57M 18.60 0.15 0.59 ± 0.21 0.19 ± 0.22 1.40 ± 0.49 1.60 ± 0.10 0.22 0 7
2015 QM3 K15Q03M 20.30 0.15 0.27 ± 0.05 0.19 ± 0.15 1.40 ± 0.27 1.60 ± 0.10 0.61 0 9
2015 RS83 K15R83S 19.40 0.15 0.47 ± 0.13 0.14 ± 0.13 1.40 ± 0.37 1.60 ± 0.10 0.52 0 5
2015 RR150 K15RF0R 19.70 0.15 0.34 ± 0.12 0.20 ± 0.19 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.60 0 13
2015 SF20 K15S20F 19.70 0.15 0.40 ± 0.16 0.15 ± 0.14 1.40 ± 0.53 1.60 ± 0.10 0.52 0 8
2015 SS20 K15S20S 22.40 0.15 0.26 ± 0.10 0.03 ± 0.03 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.44 0 7
2015 TK237 K15TN7K 22.60 0.15 0.23 ± 0.07 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.40 1.60 ± 0.10 0.53 0 7
2015 TW346 K15TY6W 18.60 0.15 1.26 ± 0.46 0.04 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.41 1.60 ± 0.10 0.44 0 15
2015 UK52 K15U52K 20.10 0.15 0.21 ± 0.06 0.35 ± 0.22 1.40 ± 0.45 1.60 ± 0.10 0.34 0 5
2015 VZ145 K15VE5Z 23.70 0.15 0.16 ± 0.06 0.02 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.52 1.60 ± 0.10 1.36 0 5
2015 WM16 K15W16M 21.80 0.15 0.39 ± 0.06 0.02 ± 0.01 1.10 ± 0.16 1.60 ± 0.10 0.17 8 8
2015 XB130 K15XD0B 21.80 0.15 0.33 ± 0.13 0.03 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.48 1.60 ± 0.10 0.58 0 9
2015 XY378 K15Xb8Y 19.60 0.15 0.31 ± 0.11 0.26 ± 0.23 1.40 ± 0.46 1.60 ± 0.10 0.32 0 5

Note.  Asteroids may be identified by numbers, provisional designations, or via the MPC packed format. Magnitude H, slope parameter G, and beaming η used are given. The numbers of observations used in the 3.4 μm (nW1) and 4.6 μm (nW2) wavelengths are also reported, along with the amplitude of the 4.6 μm light curve (W2 amp., in mag).

A machine-readable version of the table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset images: 1 2 3 4

Table 5.  Measured Diameters (d) and Albedos (pV) of Non-NEA Asteroids Observed During Year 2 of the NEOWISE Reactivation Mission

Object Packed H G d (km) pV η pIR/pV W2 amp. nW1 nW2
10 00010 5.46 0.12 450.53 ± 200.23 0.05 ± 0.05 0.95 ± 0.23 1.50 ± 0.10 0.05 4 4
13 00013 6.77 0.12 207.98 ± 46.68 0.08 ± 0.04 1.00 ± 0.35 1.00 ± 0.60 0.16 5 5
13 00013 6.77 0.12 192.79 ± 53.36 0.09 ± 0.06 1.00 ± 0.39 1.00 ± 0.60 0.32 9 9
19 00019 7.20 0.12 176.97 ± 56.71 0.06 ± 0.07 0.95 ± 0.21 1.50 ± 0.10 0.25 10 10
19 00019 7.20 0.12 182.71 ± 40.61 0.06 ± 0.03 0.95 ± 0.14 1.50 ± 0.10 0.32 8 8
21 00021 7.45 0.24 102.07 ± 24.56 0.18 ± 0.08 1.00 ± 0.39 1.00 ± 0.60 0.50 11 11
21 00021 7.45 0.24 99.71 ± 22.62 0.18 ± 0.05 1.00 ± 0.38 1.00 ± 0.60 0.35 12 13
23 00023 7.09 0.24 93.99 ± 20.14 0.29 ± 0.14 0.95 ± 0.20 1.50 ± 0.10 0.23 9 9
30 00030 7.67 0.24 105.70 ± 23.25 0.19 ± 0.11 0.95 ± 0.19 1.50 ± 0.10 0.23 6 7
33 00033 8.60 0.24 54.39 ± 11.84 0.23 ± 0.13 0.95 ± 0.19 1.50 ± 0.10 0.36 7 7

Note.  Asteroids may be identified by numbers, provisional designations, or via the MPC packed format. Beaming η, H, G, the amplitude of the 4.6 μm light curve (W2 amp., in mag), and the numbers of observations used in the 3.4 μm (nW1) and 4.6 μm (nW2) wavelengths are also reported. Only the first 10 lines are shown; the remainder are available in electronic format through the journal website.

Only a portion of this table is shown here to demonstrate its form and content. A machine-readable version of the full table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset image

The NEOWISE survey cadence observes each object over ∼1.5 days on average, and sometimes re-observes an object ∼3 to ∼6 months later at a different distance and viewing geometry. These separate epochs, defined as observations separated by >10 days, the typical amount of time for viewing geometry of NEOs to change significantly, were fit separately.

NEAs were treated differently than Mars-crossing asteroids and MBAs, because of the different characteristics of the populations and different phase angles as demonstrated in Mainzer et al. (2011b) and Masiero et al. (2011). In most cases, NEAs were fit with η = 1.4 ± 0.5. If both bands were thermally dominated, a beaming parameter was fit. A ratio of pIR/pV = 1.6 ± 1.0 was assumed for NEAs. Mars-crossing and MBA were fit with η = 0.95 ± 0.2, and the ratio of pIR/pV was taken to be 1.5 ± 0.1 in most cases. These assumptions were necessary because if only one thermally dominated band is available, a beaming parameter cannot be fit; similarly, with only the 3.4 and 4.6 μm bands, we cannot fit pIR because there is not enough information to constrain it.

As noted in Tables 4 and 5, some objects were fit with alternative beaming parameters and pIR/pV ratios. In rare cases the standard assumption of η = 1.4 ± 0.5 and η = 0.95 ± 0.2 for NEAs and MBAs, respectively, lead to poor fits. Poor fits are indicated by $\mathrm{abs}({H}_{\mathrm{observed}}-{H}_{\mathrm{modeled}})\gt 0.5$ or unphysical values of pV, generally taken to be pV < ∼0.02, pV > ∼0.6). In cases where a poor fit is obtained, we use the constraints on H magnitude errors and physical limits on albedo to exclude unphysical results and rule out certain beaming and pIR/pV values. A series of broadly spaced beaming values (in increments of 0.2) and pIR/pV ratios (in increments of 0.5) were tried; in these few cases, the associated errors were increased. These spacings were chosen so that in most cases only a single pair of beaming and pIR/pV ratios would produce a good fit.

NEATM is only effective if at least one of the wavelength bands employed is dominated by thermal emission. Therefore, any object found to have <75% thermally emitted light (generally the cooler outer main belt objects) in both bands was removed from the results. This determination is made after an initial fit to the object is completed and estimates of thermally emitted and reflected light can be computed.

4. RESULTS

Thermal fit results for NEAs are presented in Tables 4 and 5 contains the fit results for Mars-crossing and MBAs. When objects were observed at multiple epochs, a measurement of diameter and albedo is given for each epochs.

Some asteroids have diameters and albedos calculated from earlier NEOWISE measurements (Mainzer et al. 2011b, 2012a; Masiero et al. 2011, 2012; Nugent et al. 2015). Figure 3 is a histogram of the diameters and albedos for these objects measured from Reactivation Year 2 data and previous work. This figure also compares the results of the corrected H and G values from Williams (2012). Although distributions of diameter and albedo for this work are comparable to previous NEOWISE results, the incorporation of the revised H and G values does shift the albedo distribution toward slightly lower values. The implementation of the Williams (2012) H and G values did not change the diameters of the ensemble of NEAs or other asteroids in a statistically significant way (see Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Comparison between asteroid diameters (top) and albedos (bottom) measured in this work with H and G values from the MPC (blue), diameters for the same objects measured in this work with revised H and G values from Williams (2012) (black), and diameters for the same objects measured using previous NEOWISE measurements, which employed H and G values from the MPC (green). The bimodal structure of the albedo distribution is due to the populations of bright S-type (pV = 0.25) and dark C-type (pV = 0.06) objects in the main belt.

Standard image High-resolution image

When possible, diameters calculated from this work were compared to diameters calculated by independent methods (Figure 4). Twenty-three objects have diameters calculated via stellar occultations (Shevchenko & Tedesco 2006), eleven have radar-derived shapes (Benner et al. 2015), and two, (951) Gaspra and (253) Mathilde, were observed by spacecraft and had shape and size determined from resulting images (Thomas et al. 1994, 1999). These comparison cases were not preselected on light curve amplitude. When three-dimensional shapes were known, comparison was made to the average of the length of each axis. As illustrated in Figure 4, a Gaussian fit to a histogram of (${D}_{\mathrm{NEOWISE}}-{D}_{\mathrm{reference}})/{D}_{\mathrm{NEOWISE}}$ gives σ = 20%, and a Gaussian fit to a histogram of $({p}_{{\rm{v}} \mbox{-} \mathrm{NEOWISE}}-{p}_{{\rm{v}} \mbox{-} \mathrm{reference}})/{p}_{{\rm{v}} \mbox{-} \mathrm{NEOWISE}}$ gives σ = 40%.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Top: comparison of diameters and albedos derived via radar, stellar occultations, and spacecraft flybys to the values calculated in this paper. The dashed red line shows a 1:1 relation. Bottom: histograms of the fractional differences between the NEOWISE diameters (%Δd, left) and albedos (%ΔpV, right) and those derived from other methods. Dashed red line is best-fit Gaussian, with the fitted σ given in the legends.

Standard image High-resolution image

We report the Gaussian fit $1-\sigma $ uncertainty of 20% on diameter, and 40% on albedo, based on the comparison to diameter measurements made with other techniques known to produce highly accurate diameters. This encompasses the systematic uncertainties in the comparison measurements (radar, stellar occultation, and spacecraft measurements), the range of ways that actual objects do not precisely match with the assumptions of NEATM, as well as the color corrections derived for the WISE filters (Wright et al. 2010).

The diameters and albedos of NEOWISE Reactivation discoveries are compared with the diameters and albedos of objects detected during Reactivation operations in Figure 5. NEOWISE continues to discover large objects (>100 m), as well as low-albedo objects.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Diameters and albedos from NEOWISE measurements of previously known NEAs (teal circles) and NEOWISE NEA discoveries (black squares) made during years 1 and 2 of the Reactivation. NEOWISE continues to detect large objects >100 m, and many discoveries are dark. Error bars on previously known objects were omitted for clarity.

Standard image High-resolution image

4.1. Potentially Hazardous Asteroids

Potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs) have been defined as objects with H ≤ 22.0 mag and a minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID) of 0.05 AU. The MOID is a measurement of the smallest distance between two orbits (Sitarski 1968; Gronchi 2005). Since many NEAs do not have measured diameters, the H limit was used as a proxy for size. An object with pV = ∼0.14 and H = 22.0 mag corresponds to an object ∼140 m in diameter.

Using the PHA definition as defined by H limit, five NEOWISE Reactivation Year 2 discoveries are considered PHAs. However, eight NEOWISE Reactivation Year 2 discoveries are larger than 140 m in diameter and have a MOID ≤ 0.05 AU, and therefore should be classified as PHAs. With the availability of more diameter measurements of NEAs from NEOWISE, the Spitzer Space Telescope (Trilling et al. 2010), and ground-based facilities, sizes should be taken into consideration when designating PHAs, as suggested in Mainzer et al. (2012b). The fraction of PHAs within the NEOWISE NEA discoveries remains virtually constant across Year 1 and Year 2 of the Reactivation mission, and is nearly a factor of three higher than ground-based surveys.7

4.2. NHATS

The Near-Earth Object Human Space Flight Accessible Targets Study (NHATS; Barbee et al. 2013) aims to identify the asteroids that would be most accessible to a crewed mission to an asteroid.8 NHATS-compliant targets must pass a series of restrictions, including Earth departure dates before 2040 December 31, total mission ΔV ≤ 12 km s−1, and a minimum NEA stay time of eight days. Many of these objects do not have measured physical properties. The NEOWISE Year 2 Reactivation mission measured diameters and albedos for eight objects (Table 6). Two, (35107) 1991 VH and (363505) 2003 UC20, were observed during Reactivation Year 1.

Table 6.  Measured Diameters and Albedos for Objects Observed During the Year 2 Reactivation Mission that May Be Accessible by Spacecraft, Following the NHATS Criteria

Number Designation D (km) pV Minimum Round Trip (Days)
(35107) 1991 VH 0.91 ± 0.03 0.33 ± 0.04 354
(163899) 2003 SD220 0.80 ± 0.02 0.31 ± 0.04 122
(363505) 2003 UC20 1.88 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.00 290
(424392) 2007 YJ 0.24 ± 0.10 0.05 ± 0.06 98
  2011 AM24 0.50 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.01 130
  2015 GY 0.14 ± 0.05 0.18 ± 0.19 346
  2015 NA14 0.09 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.18 170

Note.  Also listed is the minimum mission round trip time in days for each object from Barbee et al. (2013).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

5. CONCLUSION

NEOWISE continues its mission to discover, track, and characterize minor planets. This release of diameters and albedos for 9092 asteroids measured using NEOWISE Year 2 observations increases the total number of asteroids with measured diameters and albedos by 1440, enabling further studies of NEAs and other asteroids by the scientific community and provides multi-epoch infrared observations that support more detailed thermophysical modeling studies. Comparison to diameters measured by other methods shows that measured diameters continue to be accurate to ∼20 + % during the Year 2 Reactivation mission. NEOWISE continues to preferentially discover large (>100 m), low-albedo NEOs.

The authors thank the reviewer, Valerio Carruba, for his careful review that improved the quality of this manuscript.

This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and JPL/California Institute of Technology, funded by NASA. This publication also makes use of data products from NEOWISE, which is a project of the JPL/California Institute of Technology, funded by the Planetary Science Division of NASA. The JPL High-Performance Computing Facility used for our simulations is supported by the JPL Office of the CIO.

This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

This project used data obtained with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), which was constructed by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) collaboration. Funding for the DES Projects has been provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. National Science Foundation, the Ministry of Science and Education of Spain, the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom, the Higher Education Funding Council for England, the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago, the Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University, the Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas A&M University, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico and the Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovacão, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and the Collaborating Institutions in the Dark Energy Survey. The Collaborating Institutions are Argonne National Laboratory, the University of California at Santa Cruz, the University of Cambridge, Centro de Investigaciones Enérgeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas-Madrid, the University of Chicago, University College London, the DES-Brazil Consortium, the University of Edinburgh, the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the Institut de Ciències de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC), the Institut de Física d'Altes Energies, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München and the associated Excellence Cluster universe, the University of Michigan, the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, the University of Nottingham, the Ohio State University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Portsmouth, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, the University of Sussex, and Texas A&M University.

This work makes use of observations from the LCOGT network.

The authors wish to thank G. Williams for providing the corrected H and G values from his dissertation used in this work.

This publication makes use of observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva (Argentina), and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (Brazil). Observing Program IDs: GS-2015A-LP-3, GS-2015B-LP-3.

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/63