Skip to main content
Log in

Least squares evaluations for form and profile errors of ellipse using coordinate data

  • Precision Measurement and Signal Processing
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the measurement and evaluation of form error of an elliptic section, an evaluation method based on least squares fitting is investigated to analyze the form and profile errors of an ellipse using coordinate data. Two error indicators for defining ellipticity are discussed, namely the form error and the profile error, and the difference between both is considered as the main parameter for evaluating machining quality of surface and profile. Because the form error and the profile error rely on different evaluation benchmarks, the major axis and the foci rather than the centre of an ellipse are used as the evaluation benchmarks and can accurately evaluate a tolerance range with the separated form error and profile error of workpiece. Additionally, an evaluation program based on the LS model is developed to extract the form error and the profile error of the elliptic section, which is well suited for separating the two errors by a standard program. Finally, the evaluation method about the form and profile errors of the ellipse is applied to the measurement of skirt line of the piston, and results indicate the effectiveness of the evaluation. This approach provides the new evaluation indicators for the measurement of form and profile errors of ellipse, which is found to have better accuracy and can thus be used to solve the difficult of the measurement and evaluation of the piston in industrial production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BS ISO 1101, Geometrical Product Specifications(GPS)[S]. UK: The Standards Policy and Strategy Committee, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WATSON G A. Least squares fitting of circles and ellipses to measured data[J]. BIT, 1999, 39: 176–191.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. KANATANI K, RANGARAJAN P. Hyper least squares fitting of circles and ellipses[J]. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2011, 55: 2197–2208.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. FITZGIBBON A, PILU M, FISHER R B. Direct least square fitting of ellipses[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1999, 21: 476–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. AHN S J, RAUH W, WARNECKE H J. Least-squares orthogonal distances fitting of circle, sphere, ellipse, hyperbola, and parabola[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2001, 34: 2283–2303.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. WALTER G, GENE H G, ROLF S. Least-squares fitting of circles and ellipses[J]. BIT, 1994, 34: 558–578.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. CUI Y T, WENG J, REYNOLDS H. Estimation of ellipse parameters using optimal minimum variance estimator[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 1996, 17: 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. CHAUDHURI D. A simple least squares method for fitting of ellipses and circles depends on border points of a two-tone image and their 3-D extensions[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2010, 31: 818–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. PAUL L R. Assessing error of fit functions for ellipses[J]. Graphical Models and Image Processing, 1996, 58(5): 494–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DILIP K P, MAYLOR K H L. Error analysis of geometric ellipse detection methods due to quantization[C]//2010 Fourth Pacific-Rim Symposium on Image and Video Technology, Singapore, November, 2010: 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ZOU Y M, Wang B. Fragmental ellipse fitting based on least square algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2006, 27(7): 808–812. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ZHANG S C, LIU Z Q. A robust real-time ellipse detector[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2005, 38: 273–287.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. PRASAD D K, LEUNG M K H. Error Analysis of Geometric Ellipse Detection Methods Due to Quantization[J]. Symposium on Image & Video Technology, 2010, 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. XU Z N, WANG S Y. A highly accurate dynamic contact angle algorithm for drops on inclined surface based on ellipse-fitting[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2015, 86(2): 025104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. HE D, LIU X, PENG X, et al. Eccentricity error identification and compensation for high-accuracy 3D optical measurement[J]. Measurement Science & Technology, 2013, 24(7): 660–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. KURT O, ARSLAN O. Geometric interpretation and precision analysis of algerbraic ellipse fitting using least squares method[J]. Acta Geod Geoph Hung, 2012, 47(4): 430–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MURTHY T S R. Methods for evaluation of elliptical profiles[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 1985, 25: 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  18. LIU S G, LI P, NA Y L. Evaluation of the form error of ellipse based on least square method[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2002, 23: 245–247. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. HOU Y, ZHANG J, CUI C Y. Data processing method of coordinate measurement for complicated curve profile error[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2002, 23: 13–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. LEI X Q, GAO Z B, CUI J W, et al. The minimum zone evaluation for elliptical profile error based on the geometry optimal approximation algorithm[J]. Measurement, 2015, 75: 284–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. XIONG Y L. Mathematical Method of Precision Measurement[M]. Beijing: China Metrology Publishing House, 1989. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. FEI Y T. Error theory and data processing[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. PENG X N, LIU F, LEI X Q. Roundness error evaluation algorithm using coordinate measuring machine[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2008, 29: 1654–1658. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Liang.

Additional information

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No. 51575438)

LIU Fei, born in 1979, is currently a PhD candidate at School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. He received his master degree from Henan University of Science and Technology, China, in 2008. His research interests include precision measurement technology and mechanical fault diagnosis.

XU Guanghua born in 1964, is currently a professor at State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering and School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. He received his PhD degree from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, in 1998. His research interests include mechanical fault diagnosis and brain-computer interface technology.

LIANG Lin born in 1972, is currently an associate professor at Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Modern Design and Rotor-Bearing System, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. He received his PhD degree from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, in 2007. His research interests include mechanical fault diagnosis, test and detection technology.

ZHANG Qing born in 1975, is currently an associate professor at Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. He received his PhD degree from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, in 2007. His research interests include mechanical fault diagnosis, mechatronics technology.

LIU Dan born in 1978, is currently a lecturer at Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. He received his PhD degree from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, in 2007. His research interests include mechanical fault diagnosis and information network.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, F., Xu, G., Liang, L. et al. Least squares evaluations for form and profile errors of ellipse using coordinate data. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 29, 1020–1028 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2016.0205.022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2016.0205.022

Keywords

Navigation