Reference Hub2
Assessing the Quality of Online Peer Feedback in L2 Writing

Assessing the Quality of Online Peer Feedback in L2 Writing

Christine Rosalia, Lorena Llosa
ISBN13: 9781599049946|ISBN10: 1599049945|EISBN13: 9781599049953
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-994-6.ch020
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Rosalia, Christine, and Lorena Llosa. "Assessing the Quality of Online Peer Feedback in L2 Writing." Handbook of Research on E-Learning Methodologies for Language Acquisition, edited by Rita de Cássia Veiga Marriott and Patricia Lupion Torres, IGI Global, 2009, pp. 322-338. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-994-6.ch020

APA

Rosalia, C. & Llosa, L. (2009). Assessing the Quality of Online Peer Feedback in L2 Writing. In R. de Cássia Veiga Marriott & P. Lupion Torres (Eds.), Handbook of Research on E-Learning Methodologies for Language Acquisition (pp. 322-338). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-994-6.ch020

Chicago

Rosalia, Christine, and Lorena Llosa. "Assessing the Quality of Online Peer Feedback in L2 Writing." In Handbook of Research on E-Learning Methodologies for Language Acquisition, edited by Rita de Cássia Veiga Marriott and Patricia Lupion Torres, 322-338. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-994-6.ch020

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

This chapter reports on an instrument that was developed to formatively assess the quality of feedback that second language students give to one another in an online, anonymous, asynchronous learning environment. The Online Peer Feedback (OPF) Assessment was originally developed for a peer online writing center in Japan where student peer advisors jointly compose feedback for a client-writer. The OPF Assessment is composed of two rubrics: (1) a rubric that evaluates the initial feedback drafted by a peer advisor, and (2) a rubric that assesses the contribution that individual peer advisors make to the interactive process of constructing the final feedback for their client-writer. The chapter describes the assessment and discusses its potential uses in a variety of contexts as a formative tool to improve the quality of peer feedback and, ultimately, the writing proficiency of both givers and receivers of the feedback.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.