Reference Hub66
A Comparative Study of Statistical and Rough Computing Models in Predictive Data Analysis

A Comparative Study of Statistical and Rough Computing Models in Predictive Data Analysis

Debi Acharjya, A. Anitha
Copyright: © 2017 |Volume: 8 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 20
ISSN: 1941-6237|EISSN: 1941-6245|EISBN13: 9781522512226|DOI: 10.4018/IJACI.2017040103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Acharjya, Debi, and A. Anitha. "A Comparative Study of Statistical and Rough Computing Models in Predictive Data Analysis." IJACI vol.8, no.2 2017: pp.32-51. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJACI.2017040103

APA

Acharjya, D. & Anitha, A. (2017). A Comparative Study of Statistical and Rough Computing Models in Predictive Data Analysis. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), 8(2), 32-51. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJACI.2017040103

Chicago

Acharjya, Debi, and A. Anitha. "A Comparative Study of Statistical and Rough Computing Models in Predictive Data Analysis," International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI) 8, no.2: 32-51. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJACI.2017040103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Information and technology revolution has brought a radical change in the way data are collected. The data collected is of no use unless some useful information is derived from it. Therefore, it is essential to think of some predictive analysis for analyzing data and to get meaningful information. Much research has been carried out in the direction of predictive data analysis starting from statistical techniques to intelligent computing techniques and further to hybridize computing techniques. The prime objective of this paper is to make a comparative analysis between statistical, rough computing, and hybridized techniques. The comparative analysis is carried out over financial bankruptcy data set of Greek industrial bank ETEVA. It is concluded that rough computing techniques provide better accuracy 88.2% as compared to statistical techniques whereas hybridized computing techniques provides still better accuracy 94.1% as compared to rough computing techniques.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.