Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning for the Web

doi:10.4018/jswis.2009040103

Reference Hub

This research has been cited in:

Chapter
OWL 2 Profiles: An Introduction to Lightweight Ontology LanguagesReasoning Web. Semantic Technologies for Advanced Query Answering10.1007/978-3-642-33158-9_4
Article
Scalable and distributed methods for entity matching, consolidation and disambiguation over linked data corporaJournal of Web Semantics10.1016/j.websem.2011.11.002
Chapter
Semantic WebA Guided Tour of Artificial Intelligence Research10.1007/978-3-030-06170-8_6
Article
Searching and browsing Linked Data with SWSE: The Semantic Web Search EngineJournal of Web Semantics10.1016/j.websem.2011.06.004
Chapter
Practical RDF Schema Reasoning with Annotated Semantic Web DataThe Semantic Web – ISWC 201110.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_47
Chapter
Concurrent Classification of $\mathcal{EL}$ OntologiesThe Semantic Web – ISWC 201110.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_20
Article
Scalable reduction of large datasets to interesting subsetsJournal of Web Semantics10.1016/j.websem.2010.08.002
Article
The METACLIP semantic provenance framework for climate productsEnvironmental Modelling & Software10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.07.005
Conference
WEON: towards a software ecosystem ONtologyProceedings of the 2013 International Workshop on Ecosystem Architectures10.1145/2501585.2501589
Article
On the integration of trust with negotiation, argumentation and semanticsThe Knowledge Engineering Review10.1017/S0269888913000064
Article
Link traversal querying for a diverse Web of DataSemantic Web10.3233/SW-140164
Conference
A self-training approach for resolving object coreference on the semantic webProceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web10.1145/1963405.1963421
Chapter
Context-Dependent OWL Reasoning in Sindice - Experiences and Lessons LearntWeb Reasoning and Rule Systems10.1007/978-3-642-23580-1_5
Article
Why are Ontologies Not Reused Across the Same Domain?SSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.3315457
Chapter
Scalable OWL 2 Reasoning for Linked DataReasoning Web. Semantic Technologies for the Web of Data10.1007/978-3-642-23032-5_5
Chapter
Directing Status Messages to Their Audience in Online CommunitiesCoordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems V10.1007/978-3-642-14962-7_13
Article
The Incredible ELKJournal of Automated Reasoning10.1007/s10817-013-9296-3
Chapter
Redundancy Elimination on RDF Graphs in the Presence of Rules, Constraints, and QueriesWeb Reasoning and Rule Systems10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_11
Article
Why are ontologies not reused across the same domain?Journal of Web Semantics10.1016/j.websem.2018.12.010
Chapter
Using Caching Techniques to Improve the Performance of Rule-Based Inference Applications in Semantic TechnologiesElectronic Business and Marketing10.1007/978-3-642-37932-1_7
Conference
A distributed rule execution mechanism based on MapReduce in sematic web reasoningProceedings of the 5th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware10.1145/2532443.2532457
Article
Semantic-based QoS management in cloud systems: Current status and future challengesFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2013.10.015
Article
Parallel tractability of ontology materialization: Technique and practiceJournal of Web Semantics10.1016/j.websem.2018.09.005
Article
WebPIE: A Web-scale Parallel Inference Engine using MapReduceJournal of Web Semantics10.1016/j.websem.2011.05.004
Article
A design for a common‐sense knowledge‐enhanced decision‐support system: Integration of high‐frequency market data and real‐time newsExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.12209
Chapter
KR and Reasoning on the Semantic Web: Web-Scale ReasoningHandbook of Semantic Web Technologies10.1007/978-3-540-92913-0_11
Article
An Introduction to Semantic Threat Analysis for Systems Security EngineeringINCOSE International Symposium10.1002/iis2.12945
Article
Robust and scalable Linked Data reasoning incorporating provenance and trust annotationsJournal of Web Semantics10.1016/j.websem.2011.06.003
Chapter
Parallel Materialization of the Finite RDFS Closure for Hundreds of Millions of TriplesThe Semantic Web - ISWC 200910.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_43
Chapter
OWL Reasoning with WebPIE: Calculating the Closure of 100 Billion TriplesThe Semantic Web: Research and Applications10.1007/978-3-642-13486-9_15
Chapter
Scalable and Parallel Reasoning in the Semantic WebThe Semantic Web: Research and Applications10.1007/978-3-642-13489-0_49
Article
Empirical analysis of domain ontology usage on the Web: eCommerce domain in focusConcurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience10.1002/cpe.3089
Article
Optimizing Multi-Query Evaluation in Federated RDF SystemsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2019.2947050

Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning for the Web

Aidan Hogan, Andreas Harth, Axel Polleres

Source Title: International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS)5(2)

Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Hogan, Aidan, et al. "Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning for the Web." IJSWIS vol.5, no.2 2009: pp.49-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2009040103

APA

Hogan, A., Harth, A., & Polleres, A. (2009). Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning for the Web. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 5(2), 49-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2009040103

Chicago

Hogan, Aidan, Andreas Harth, and Axel Polleres. "Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning for the Web," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 5, no.2: 49-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2009040103

Export Reference

Favorite Full-Issue Download

View Full Text PDF

Abstract

In this article the authors discuss the challenges of performing reasoning on large scale RDF datasets from the Web. Using ter-Horst’s pD* fragment of OWL as a base, the authors compose a rule-based framework for application to web data: they argue their decisions using observations of undesirable examples taken directly from the Web. The authors further temper their OWL fragment through consideration of “authoritative sources” which counter-acts an observed behaviour which they term “ontology hijacking”: new ontologies published on the Web re-defining the semantics of existing entities resident in other ontologies. They then present their system for performing rule-based forward-chaining reasoning which they call SAOR: Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoner. Based upon observed characteristics of web data and reasoning in general, they design their system to scale: the system is based upon a separation of terminological data from assertional data and comprises of a lightweight in-memory index, on-disk sorts and file-scans. The authors evaluate their methods on a dataset in the order of a hundred million statements collected from real-world Web sources and present scale-up experiments on a dataset in the order of a billion statements collected from the Web.

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.

Username or email: *

Password: *

Forgot individual login password?

Create individual account

Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning for the Web

MLA

APA

Chicago

Export Reference

Abstract

Request Access