Optimum Length for Pin Fins Used in Electronic Cooling

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present work deals with the heat transfer analysis of pin fins of various geometries namely ─ circular, triangular and rectangular and thus arrive at the optimum design. To this end, the fin with convective boundary tip is considered and the equation governing the one-dimensional heat conduction in the fin is solved analytically to obtain the temperature distribution and heat transfer rate. A computer code has been developed to generate results for wide range of parameters─ heat transfer coefficient h, thermal conductivity k, and length of the fin l. Results are plotted in the form of temperature variation, heat transfer variation and optimum length variation. From the detailed discussion of the results it can be concluded optimum length decreases with increasing heat transfer coefficient and it increases with increasing thermal conductivity. It can be also concluded that the optimum length is minimum for a triangular fin compared to rectangular and circular fins.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1667-1673

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] Aziz, Perturbation solution for convective fin with internal heat generation and temperature and temperature dependent thermal conductivity, Intenational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (1976) , Vol 20, pp.1253-1255.

DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(77)90135-1

Google Scholar

[2] Bengt Sunden, Analysis of Conjugated laminar and turbulent forced convection-conduction heat transfer of plate fin, International Comm. Heat and Mass Transfer (1989), Vol. 16, p.821831.

DOI: 10.1016/0735-1933(89)90008-0

Google Scholar

[3] Ming-Jer Huang and Chao-Kuang Chen, Conjugate forced convection -conduction plate fin in power law fluids, International Comm. Heat and Mass Transfer (1987) , Vol. 14, pp.371-380.

DOI: 10.1016/0735-1933(87)90058-3

Google Scholar

[4] Andrea de LietoVollaro, Stefano Grignaffini, Franco Gugliermetti, Optimum design of vertical rectangular fin arrays, International Journal of Thermal Sciences (1999) pp.525-529.

DOI: 10.1016/s1290-0729(99)80025-8

Google Scholar

[5] Yunus A. Cengel. Heat and Mass transfer, A Tata McGraw-Hill Publications, Third Edition ( SI Units) Fourth Reprint, 2008. Figure 1. Temperature profile of circular fin for various values of h 73.

Google Scholar

[73] 2.

Google Scholar

[73] 4.

Google Scholar

[73] 6.

Google Scholar

[73] 8 74.

Google Scholar

[74] 2.

Google Scholar

[74] 4.

Google Scholar

[74] 6.

Google Scholar

[74] 8 75.

Google Scholar

[75] 2 0 0. 005 0. 01 0. 015 Temperature X h=10 h=15 h=20 h=25 k=150 W/mK l=0. 0116 m Tb=750 C T∞=600C Figure 2. Temperature profile of circular fin for various values of k Figure 3 Comparison of temperature profile of different cross-sectional fins. Figure 4 Comparison of Heat transfer profile of different cross-sectional fins. 73.

Google Scholar

[73] 2.

Google Scholar

[73] 4.

Google Scholar

[73] 6.

Google Scholar

[73] 8 74.

Google Scholar

[74] 2.

Google Scholar

[74] 4.

Google Scholar

[74] 6.

Google Scholar

[74] 8 75.

Google Scholar

[75] 2 0 0. 005 0. 01 0. 015 Temperature X k=120 k=150 k=180 k=210 73.

Google Scholar

[73] 5 74.

Google Scholar

[74] 5 75.

Google Scholar

[75] 5 0 0. 005 0. 01 0. 015 Temperature X in metre Circular Rectangular Triangular 0.

Google Scholar

18 0 0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 4 Q L Circular Rectangular Triangular h=20 W/m2 K l=0. 0116 m Tb=750 C T∞=600C k=150 W/mK h=20 W/m 2 K l=0. 0116 m Tb=75 0 C T∞=600 C h=20 W/m2 K k=150W/mK Tb=750 C T∞=600C Figure 5 Optimum length vs Heat transfer coefficient h Figure 6 Optimum length vs Thermal conductivity k.

Google Scholar

28 5 10 15 20 25 30 Optimum length h Circle Rectangle Triangle.

Google Scholar

26 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 Optimum length k circle rectangle triangle k=150W/mK l=0. 0116 m Tb=750 C T∞=600 C h=20W/m2 K l=0. 0116 m Tb=750 C T∞=600C.

Google Scholar