[1]
C. Shen and T. Li Learning to rank for query-focused multi-document summarization, in Data Mining (ICDM), 2011 IEEE 11th InternationalConference on. IEEE, 2011, p.626–634.
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2011.91
Google Scholar
[2]
Z. Cao, T. Qin, T. Liu, M. Tsai, and H. Li, Learning to rank: frompairwise approach to listwise approach, in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, 2007, p.129–136.
DOI: 10.1145/1273496.1273513
Google Scholar
[3]
X. Wan, J. Yang, and J. Xiao, Manifold-ranking based topic-focusedmulti-document summarization, in Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence. Morgan KaufmannPublishers Inc., 2007, p.2903–2908.
Google Scholar
[4]
X. Li, Y. Shen, L. Du, and C. Xiong, Exploiting novelty, coverageand balance for topic-focused multi-document summarization, in Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference onInformation and Knowledge Management. ACM, 2010, p.1765–1768.
DOI: 10.1145/1871437.1871724
Google Scholar
[5]
D. Zhou, J. Weston, A. Gretton, O. Bousquet, and B. Schölkopf, Ranking on data manifolds, Advances in Neural InformationProcessing Systems, vol. 16, p.169–176, (2004).
Google Scholar
[6]
Q. Mei, J. Guo, and D. Radev, Divrank: the interplay of prestige anddiversity in information networks, in Proceedings of the 16th ACMSIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery andData Mining. ACM, 2010, p.1009–1018.
DOI: 10.1145/1835804.1835931
Google Scholar
[7]
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd, The pagerank citationranking: bringing order to the web., (1999).
Google Scholar
[8]
J. Kleinberg, Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment, Journal of the ACM (JACM), vol. 46, no. 5, p.604–632, (1999).
DOI: 10.1145/324133.324140
Google Scholar
[9]
J. Otterbacher, G. Erkan, and D. Radev, Using random walks forquestion-focused sentence retrieval, in Proceedings of theConferenceon Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005, p.915.
DOI: 10.3115/1220575.1220690
Google Scholar
[10]
R. Mihalcea and P. Tarau, Textrank: Bringing order into texts, inProceedings of EMNLP, vol. 4. Barcelona, Spain, 2004, p.404–411.
Google Scholar
[11]
W. Yin, Y. Pei, F. Zhang, and L. Huang, Query-focused multi-documentsummarization based on query-sensitive feature space, in Proceedingsof the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and KnowledgeManagement. ACM, 2012, p.1652–1656.
DOI: 10.1145/2396761.2398491
Google Scholar
[12]
Y. Ouyang, S. Li, and W. Li, Developing learning strategies fortopic-basedsummarization, in Proceedings of the sixteenth ACMConference on Conference on Information and KnowledgeManagement. ACM, 2007, p.79–86.
Google Scholar
[13]
F. Jin, M. Huang, and X. Zhu, A comparative study on ranking andselection strategies for multi-document summarization, in Proceedingsof the 23rd International Conference on ComputationalLinguistics: Posters. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, p.525.
Google Scholar
[14]
Y. Chali and S. Hasan, Query-focused multi-document summarization: automatic data annotations and supervised learningapproaches, NaturalLanguage Engineering, vol. 18, no. 1, p.109, (2012).
DOI: 10.1017/s1351324911000167
Google Scholar
[15]
C. Lin, Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries, in Text Summarization Branches Out: Proceedings of the ACL-04Workshop, 2004, p.74–81.
Google Scholar
[16]
B. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Liu, L. Ji, W. Xi, W. Fan, Z. Chen, and W. Ma, Improving web search results using affinity graph, in Proceedings ofthe 28th AnnualInternational ACM SIGIR Conference on Research andDevelopment in Information Retrieval. ACM, 2005, p.504.
DOI: 10.1145/1076034.1076120
Google Scholar
