Paper Titles

The Study on Metaphor and Interest of Graphic Design
p.138

Research on Tourism United Marketing in Turpan Area, Xinjiang, China
p.144

The Research on Color and Text Usage in the Graphic Design
p.149

Forest Fire Monitoring System Based on Image Analysis
p.155

A Software Project Management Method Based on Trust and Knowledge Sharing
p.160

Application of 3D Animation Technology in Movie Art Design
p.164

Neusoft Software Talent Train Mode Research
p.170

Japan Software Project Risk Management
p.175

A Study on Pen-Based Input Operation and Tilt Angle of Tablet
p.179

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 267A Software Project Management Method Based on...

A Software Project Management Method Based on Trust and Knowledge Sharing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Trust is the most important issue to create relationship making value in knowledge sharing. Knowledge itself cannot lead to a success, as knowledge sharing or flow of knowledge is of prime importance in an organization. Knowledge sharing depends on trust between trusted and trustee members in specific knowledge context and specific time slot. Trust level between members has a high impact on software project performance. The future work could include defining a role and measurement of trust and knowledge sharing in the software project performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Manufacturing Systems and Industry Application

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 267)

Pages:

160-163

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.267.160

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2011

Authors:

Rong Fa Tang, Xiao Yu Huang

Keywords:

Knowledge Sharing, Software Project Performance Management, Trust

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

[1] Jorgensen, M. and K. Moloken-Ostvold, How large are software cost overruns? A review of the 1994 CHAOS report, in Information and Software Technology 48. 2006. pp.297-301.

DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2005.07.002

[2] Gilb, T. No Cure No Pay: How to Contract for Software Services. 2006 [cited accessed 24 May 2006]; Available from: http: /roots. dnd. no/repository/05_Gilb_Tom_No_ Cure_No _Pay. pdf.

DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2006.tb02790.x

[3] International, S.G. CHAOS: Project failure and success report. 1994 [cited; Available from: http: /www. pm2go. comisample_researchichaos_1994_2. asp.

[4] Rubenstein, D. Standish group report: There's less development chaos today. SO Times.

[5] Cerpa, N. and J.M. Verner, Why Did Your Project Fail? Communications of the ACM, 2009. 52(12): pp.130-134.

DOI: 10.1145/1610252.1610286

[6] Linberg, K.R., Software developer perceptions about software project failure: a case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 1999. 49(2-3): pp.177-192.

DOI: 10.1016/s0164-1212(99)00094-1

[7] Chen, J. -C. and S. -J. Huang, An empirical analysis of the impact of software development problem factors on software maintainability. Journal of Systems and Software, 2009. 82(6): pp.981-992.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.12.036

[8] Yong, H., et al. A Neural Network Approach for Software Risk Analysis. in Sixth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining -Workshops (ICDMW'06). 2006. Hong Kong, China.: IEEE.

DOI: 10.1109/icdmw.2006.14

[9] McCreery, J. and V. Moranta. Mapping Team Collaboration in Software Development Projects. in Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET'09). 2009. Portland, Oregon USA.

DOI: 10.1109/picmet.2009.5262038

[10] Moe, N.B. and D. Smite, Understanding a lack of trust in Global Software Teams: a multiple-case study. 2007, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

[11] Juan-Ru, W. and Y. Jin. Study on Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Software Development Team. in Fourth International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCom'08). 2008. Dalian, China.

DOI: 10.1109/wicom.2008.2951

[12] Mayer, R.C., OJ. Davis, and F.D. Shoorman, An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 1995. 20(3): pp.709-734.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

[13] Jarvenpaa, S.L., T.R. Shaw, and D.S. Staples, Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research 2004. 15(3): pp.250-267.

DOI: 10.1287/isre.1040.0028

[14] Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity. 1990: Stanford University Press.

[15] Melnik, G. and F. Maurer. Direct Verbal Communication as a Catalyst of Agile Knowledge Sharing. in Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference(ADC'04). 2004. Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

DOI: 10.1109/adevc.2004.12

[16] Alavi, M. and D. Leidner, Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1999. 1(7): pp.2-36.

[17] Hansen, M. and M. Haas, Competing for Attention in Knowledge Markets: Electronic Document Dissemination in a Management Consulting Company. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001. 46(1): pp.1-28.

DOI: 10.2307/2667123

[18] Szulanski, G., The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000, 82(1): pp.9-27.

DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2884

[19] Zack, M., Managing Codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 1999. 40(4): pp.45-58.

[20] Boland, R. and R. Tenkasi, Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing. Organization Science, 1995. 6(4): pp.350-372.

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.6.4.350

[21] Brown, J. and P. Duguid, The Social Life of Information. 2000, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

[22] Nidumolu, S., M. Subramani, and A. Aldrich, Situated Learning and the Situated Knowledge Web. Joural of Management Information Systems, 2001. 18(1): pp.115-150.

DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045675

[23] Nonaka, I. and N. Konno, The Concept of Ba,: Building a foundation for Knowledge Creation. Califoria Management Review, 1998. 40(3): pp.40-55.

DOI: 10.2307/41165942