Effects of Various Additives on Drying Shrinkage, Compressive and Flexural Strength of Lightweight Foamed Concrete (LFC)

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an investigation on lightweight foamed concrete (LFC) with different type of additives. LFC with 600, 1000 and 1400 kg/m3 density were cast and tested. Fly ash, lime and polypropylene fibre were used on each density with different percentages. All the additives effects were compared with normal LFC as control mix. Mechanical properties of LFC were evaluated with several tests up to 180 days. The results show that the drying shrinkage, compressive strength and flexural strength are affected by the hydration process of each additive in the harden LFC. Fly ash as pozzolanic material helps to strengthen the LFC, though it needs longer curing period to achieve ultimate strength. Lime gives slight contribution to strength as detail investigation on microstructure formation will give clear answer on how the mechanical properties were affected. The addition of polypropylene contributes to flexural strength and shrinkage of LFC. Polypropylene fibre only contributes to compressive strength at low LFC density.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

594-604

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

[1] Ramamurthy, K., Kunhanandan, E. K. & Indu Siva Ranjani, G. 2009. A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31, 388-396.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.006

Google Scholar

[2] LEE, H. K. & SONG, S. Y. 2010. Performance characteristic of lightweight aggregate cellular concrete containing polypropylene fibers. Journal of reinforced plastics and composites 29, 883-897.

DOI: 10.1177/0731684408100741

Google Scholar

[3] Jones, M.R. & McCarthy, A. 2006. Heat of hydration in foamed concrete: Effect of mix constituents and plastic density. Cement and Concrete Research, 36, 1032-1041.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.011

Google Scholar

[4] Jones, M. R. & McCarthy, A. 2005. Preliminary views on the potential of foamed concrete as a structural material. Magazine of concrete research 57, 21-31.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.2005.57.1.21

Google Scholar

[5] Just, A. & Midderndoff, B. 2009. Microstructure of high-strength foam concrete. Material Characterization 60, 741-748.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2008.12.011

Google Scholar

[6] British Standard (BS) EN 12390-3 (2009) – Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimen.

Google Scholar

[7] British Standard (BS) EN 12390-5 (2009) – Testing hardened concrete. Flexural strength of test specimens.

Google Scholar

[8] British Standard (BS) EN 1881-206 (1986) – Testing concrete. Recomendations for determination of strain in concrete.

Google Scholar

[9] Barbhuiya, S. A., Gbagbo, J. K., Russell, M. I. & Basheer, P.A.M. 2009. Properties of fly ash concrete modified with hydrated lime and silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 3233–3239.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.001

Google Scholar

[10] Izaguirre, A., Lanas, J. & Alvarez, J. I. 2011. Effect of a polypropylene fibre on the behavior of aerial lime-based mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 992-1000.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.080

Google Scholar