Study of Transducer Installation Effects on Ultrasonic Flow Metering Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Article Preview

Abstract:

In ultrasonic flow metering, the inner pipe wall will be distorted by transducer’s installation, and the velocity profile of the meter will be different from that in a long straight pipe located in front of or behind the meter section. Changes in profile will finally influence the flow measurement accuracy. This paper shows a multi-path ultrasonic flow meter with its transducers installed at different positions. Our purpose is to find the best transducer installation position and to study the influence of path numbers and pipe diameters on the flow measurement accuracy at the best installation position. With a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis, velocity profiles are calculated. Negative bias errors are obtained at all the three of the common installation positions. Similar phenomenon has also been observed in a real field experiment. The reasons for the negative bias error have also been analyzed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

676-681

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

[1] Zhang J, Wang B, Luo X. MEMS-based ultrasonic flow measurement. Proc. IEEE Symp. 8th International Symposium on Test and Measurement (ISTM/2009), Chongqing, China, August 2009; vol. 3, pp.1227-1232.

Google Scholar

[2] Brown GJ, Augenstein DR, Cousins T. An 8-path ultrasonic master meter for oil custody transfers. XVIII IMEKO World Congress: Metrology for a Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, September; 2006, pp.17-22.

Google Scholar

[3] Yeh TT, Mattingly G. Computer simulations of ultrasonic flowmeter performance in ideal and non-ideal pipe flows. ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 1997; pp. FEDSM97-3012.

Google Scholar

[4] Pamela IM, Aaron NJ, Pedro E. Simulations of ultrasonic transit time in a fully developed turbulent flow using a Ray-Tracing method. North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop, 2002; pp.1-8.

Google Scholar

[5] Willatzen M. Flow acoustics modelling and implications for ultrasonic flow measurement based on the transit-time method. Ultrasonics, 2004; vol. 41, p.805–810.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2003.12.044

Google Scholar

[6] Iooss B, Lhuillier C, Jeanneau H. Numerical simulation of transit-time ultrasonic flowmeters: uncertainties due to flow profile and fluid turbulence, Ultrasonics, 2002; vol. 40, pp.1009-1015.

DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(02)00387-6

Google Scholar

[7] He S, Peng LH, Zhong LM. Computational fluid dynamics based sound path optimization for ultrasonic flowmeter. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2009; vol. 30, pp.852-856.

Google Scholar

[8] Mandard E, Kouamé D, Battault R, Remenieras JP, Patat F. Transit time ultrasonic flowmeter : Velocity profile estimation. Proc. IEEE Symp. Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005; pp.763-766.

DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2005.1602963

Google Scholar

[9] Pannell CN, Evans WAB, Jackson DA. A new integration technique for flowmeters with cordal paths. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1990; vol. 1, pp: 216-224.

DOI: 10.1016/0955-5986(90)90016-z

Google Scholar