Distribution & Access For Publication Downloads News About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Strontium Bismuthates Sr2Bi2O5 and Sr6Bi2O11: Temperature Dependencies of Urbach Energy and Location of «Urbach Focus»
p.181
Kinetic Dependencies of the Photorefractive Effect in Lithium Niobate Crystals
p.186
Laser-Printed Self-Organized Bimetallic Nanotextures for Multiwavelength Surface Enhanced Photoluminescence
p.191
Non-Invasive Temperature-Feedback SERS with all-Dielectric Resonant Nanostructures
p.196
Plant Morphogenesis under Different Light Intensity
p.201
ZnS:Mn2+ Quantum Dots as Efficient Photocatalyst for Organic Dye Decolorization
p.207
Mapping the Refractive Index of Dielectric Surfaces with Spherical Plasmonic Nanoantenna
p.214
Optical Method for Formation of Nanostructure in Nanosuspension
p.219
Designing of Spiral-Shape Beams to Tailor Chirality of Laser-Printed Nanoneedles
p.224

Plant Morphogenesis under Different Light Intensity

Article Preview

Abstract:

The innovative LED light source (Sun Box) with irradiation spectrum close to the sun spectrum in the wavelength range 440-660 nm was used in experiment for study the influence of light intensity (75, 135, 230 and 382 μmol/s*m2) on the growth and development of plants. Standard fluorescent lighting was used as a control. The experiments were carried out on plantlets of Stevia rebaudiana and Solanum tuberosum, cvs. Snegir, Rozhdestvenskiy and Kamchatskii) in vitro. The illumination intensity of 75 and 230 μmol/s*m2 promoted development of S. rebaudiana plantlets with optimal values of morphometric parameters and well developed roots, which is important for plantlet adaptation to soil conditions. For S. tuberosum plantlets (Snegir and Rozhdestvenskiy cultivars), radiation intensity of 135 μmol/s*m2 was optimal for micropropagation. The illumination intensity of 230 μmol/s*m2 led to a formation of plantlets with the largest total fresh mass among experimental groups. Sun Box light with intensity of 75 μmol/s*m2 could be applicated for micropropagation of these cultivars: plantlets were the highest with the largest internodes number. Thus, the plant response to different light intensity was species-spesific, and – in case of potato plantlets – cultivar-spesific. The use of artificial light sources with distinct PPFD level could be preferable for S. tuberosum and S. rebaudiana plantlet micropropagation in vitro, as it could shorten the cultivation time, accelerate cultivation time, and reduce the cost of electricity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Physics and Technology of Nanostructured Materials IV View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 386)

Pages:

201-206

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.386.201

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2018

Authors:

Yuriy Nikolaevich Kulchin, Olga Valerievna Nakonechnaya*, Irina Victorovna Gafitskaya, Olga Vadimovna Grishchenko, Tatyana Yuryevna Epifanova, Irina Yuryevna Orlovskaya, Yuriy Nikolaevich Zhuravlev, Evgenii Petrovich Subbotin

Keywords:

Artificial Light, In Vitro, Light Emitting Diodes, Light Intensity, Micropropagation, Plant Growth, Solanum tuberosum, Stevia rebaudiana

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Sh.B. Bayrambekov, O.G. Korneva, Potential for the use of arachidonic acid derivatives in the cultivation of early potatoes, Potatoes and vegetables 8 (2009) 11.

Google Scholar

[2] N.N. Protasova, Growing plants under artificial light as a means for evaluating potential productivity, Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 34 (1987) 812–822.

Google Scholar

[3] V.A. Opritov, S.S. Pyatygin, V.G. Retivin, Bioelectrogenesis in higher plants, Nauka, Moscow, (1991).

Google Scholar

[4] P.R. Burkholder, The Rôle of Light in the Life of Plants. II. The Influence of Light upon Growth and Differentiation, Bot. Rev. 2 (1936) 97-172.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02872368

Google Scholar

[5] Yu.C. Martirosyan, M.N. Polyakova, T.A. Dilovarova, A.A. Kosobryuhov, Photosynthesis and productivity of potato plants under different spectral irradiation, Agricultural Biology 1 (2013), 107-112.

Google Scholar

[6] P.B. Jeppesen, S.Gregersen, C.R. Poulsen, Stevioside acts directly on pancreatic beta cells to secrete insulin: Actions independent of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and adenosine triphosphate-sensitive K+-channel activity, Metabolism 49 (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0495(00)91325-8

Google Scholar

[7] N.P. Aksenova, T.N. Konstantinova, L.I. Sergeeva, I. Macháčková, S.A. Golyanovskaya. Morphogenesis of potato plants in vitro. I. Effects of light quality and hormones, J. Plant Growth Reg. 13 (1994) 143-146.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00196378

Google Scholar

[8] Yu.Ts. Martirosyan, A.A. Kosobryukhov, V.D. Kreslavskii, T.A. Dilovarova, O.S. Melik-Sarkisov, S.V. Letunova, P.N. Kharchenko. Photosynthesis and productivity of potato plants growing in the conditions of aeroponics with additional exposure to light diode, Agricultural Biology 3 (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] V.Yu. Dorofeev, Yu.V. Medvedeva, R.A. Karnachuk, Optimization of the light regime in the cultivation of healthy potato plants in vitro for increase the production process, Proceedings of VI Moscow. Intern. congress Expo-biohim-technology,, 1 (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] R.A. Karnachuk, V.Yu. Dorofeev, Yu.V. Medvedeva, Photoregulation of growth and productivity of potato plants during reproduction in vitro, VII Congress of Plant Physiologists of Russia, Novgorod, 2011, 313-314.

Google Scholar

[11] I.F. Golovatskaya, V.Yu. Dorofeev, Y.V. Medvedeva, P.E. Nikiforov, R.A. Karnachuk, Optimization of illumination conditions in cultivation process of Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Lugovskoy microcuttings in vitro, Tomsk State University Journal of Biology 4 (2013).

Google Scholar

[12] L.B. Zaidan, S.M. Dietrich, G.M. Felippe, Effect of photoperiod on flowering and stevioside content in plants of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 49 (1980), 569–574.

DOI: 10.1626/jcs.49.569

Google Scholar

[13] S. Ceunen, S. Werbrouck, J.M. Geuns Stimulation of steviol glycoside accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana by red LED light, J. Plant Physiol. 169 (2012), 749–752.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.01.006

Google Scholar

[14] N.I. Bondarev, O.V. Reshetnyak, A.M. Nosov, Influence of visible light spectral composition and UV-radiation on development of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plants in vitro and biosynthesis in them of steviol glycosides, Scientific notes of Orel State University. Series: Natural, technical and medical sciences 4 (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9452(01)00400-9

Google Scholar

[15] J.M. Evans, V.A. Vallejo, R.M. Beaudry, R.M. Warner, Daily light integral Influences steviol glycoside biosynthesis and relative abundance of specific glycosides in Stevia, HortScience 50 (2015), 1479–1485.

DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.50.10.1479

Google Scholar

[16] E.I. Ermakov, A.A. Kochetov, Growth and productivity of stevia under controlled conditions, depending on photoperiod and light intensity, Reports of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences 6 (1994), 7-8.

Google Scholar

[17] N.E. Gogichayshvili, The accumulation of dry overground mass and sweet glycosides in plants Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni in different light modes under controlled conditions, Materials of the IV International Conference Selection, Ecology, Technology of Cultivation and Processing of Unconventional Plants,, Simferopol, 1996, pp.94-96.

Google Scholar

[18] N.I. Bondarev, O.V. Reshetnyak, A.M. Nosov, The effect of photoperiod and irradiation intensity on the development of Stevia rebaudiana shoots in vitro and the synthesis of steviol glycosides in them, Bulletin ТSChА. 4 (2008), 102–107.

DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33809

Google Scholar

[19] T. Murashige, F. Skoog, A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures, Physiol. Plant. 15 (1962), 473–497.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

Google Scholar

[20] E.P. Subbotin, I.V. Gafitskaya, O.V. Nakonechnaya, Yu.N. Zhuravlev, Yu.N. Kulchin, The influence of artificial sunlight and its intensity on the growth and development of Solanum tuberosum regenerants, Turczaninowia 21 (2018), 32–39.

DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.21.2.4

Google Scholar

Scientific.Net is a registered brand of Trans Tech Publications Ltd
© 2024 by Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved