Distribution & Access For Publication Downloads News About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Stereometric Parameters of Butterfly Wings
p.1
Comparison of the Mathematics and Physics Models Fitting of Velocity Time-Dependent for Usain Bolt in the 100 Metres Sprint
p.11
Biomechanics Analysis of Different Angle of Sole’s Toe-Box Region during Walking and Jogging
p.22
Wavelet Based Machine Learning Technique to Classify the Different Shoulder Movement of Upper Limb Amputee
p.32
Stress Distribution of the Variable Dynamic Loading in the Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
p.44
Temperature Coagulant Tub Variation Effect on the Characteristic of Hollow Fiber Dialyser from Cellulose Acetate Composite D-Glucose Monohydrate
p.53
Effect of Glutaraldehid on Human Amniotic Membrane Characteristics as Wound Dressing
p.61
Regeneration Mechanism of Full Thickness Cartilage Defect Using Combination of Freeze Dried Bovine Cartilage Scaffold - Allogenic Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells - Platelet Rich Plasma Composite (SMPC) Implantation
p.70
Level of Nitrogen Oxide and Indicators of Oxidative-Antioxidative Status in the Gingival Tissues, Blood Plasma in Experimental Chronic Gastritis and Duodenitis and Drug Correction
p.83

Biomechanics Analysis of Different Angle of Sole’s Toe-Box Region during Walking and Jogging

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study aims to investigate the kinematics and kinetics of wearing of the different height of shoe toe box walking and jogging. A total of 20 normal males participated in the experiment controlling the jogging speed of 8 km/h and the walking speed of 4 km/h. The Vicon three dimension motions analysis system was taken to capture the kinematics of lower extremity while jogging and walking text. The Novel Pedar-X insole plantar pressure measurement system was utilized to collect the plantar pressure in specific anatomical areas. The function of toe box regions is analyzed through the comparison of plantar pressure parameters and kinematic results. They performed both texts under four conditions which is common sneaker (A), sneaker of Marathon (B), flat sneaker (C) and specially customized sneaker (D). During the walking phase, the ankle of C showed significantly less peak plantar flexion than other shoes. During the jogging phase, the ankle for D showed significantly larger peak flexion than other shoes, and the C is smallest. Meanwhile, the ankle and knee of all shoes expressed different changes in the sagittal and frontal plane. The D of peak pressure and pressure-time integral are obviously higher than other shoes in BT and LFF area. The contact time of D and other shoes exist significant differences in jogging. Compare to wearing different height of shoe box sneakers, the D shoe wearer may enhance BT and forefoot areas power and proprioceptive, to improve athletic performance and to keep balance. The C shoe does not fit sport because it’s having more larger plantar pressure in most of the foot region than other shoes, easy to cause the injury of lower limbs. The A and B shoes are no sensible difference in jogging and walking.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering Vol. 31 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Volume 31)

Pages:

22-31

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.31.22

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2017

Authors:

Jie Yuan Qian, Shi Rui Shao*, Ying Yue Zhang, Sergey Popik, Yao Dong Gu

Keywords:

Angle Joint, Gait, Jogging, Plantar Pressure, Toe Box

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Willson, J. D., Bjorhus, J. S., Iii, D. S. B. W., Butler, R. J., Porcari, J. P., & Kernozek, T. W. (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] Tam, N., Astephen Wilson, J. L., Noakes, T. D., & Tucker, R. (2014). Barefoot running: an evaluation of current hypothesis, future research and clinical applications. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(5), 349.

DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092404

Google Scholar

[3] Revill, A. L., Perry, S. D., Edwards, A. M., & Dickey, J. P. (2008). Variability of the impact transient during repeated barefoot walking trials. Journal of Biomechanics, 41(4), 926-930.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.002

Google Scholar

[4] Nunns, M., House, C., Fallowfield, J., Allsopp, A., & Dixon, S. (2013). Biomechanical characteristics of barefoot footstrike modalities. Journal of Biomechanics, 46(15), 2603-2610.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.009

Google Scholar

[5] Branthwaite, H., Chockalingam, N., & Greenhalgh, A. (2013). The effect of shoe toe box shape and volume on forefoot interdigital and plantar pressures in healthy females. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 6(1), 1-9.

DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-28

Google Scholar

[6] Jørgensen, U. (1990). Body load in heel-strike running: the effect of a firm heel counter. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 18(18), 177-181.

DOI: 10.1177/036354659001800211

Google Scholar

[7] Stefanyshyn, D. J., Nigg, B. M., Fisher, V., O'Flynn, B., & Liu, W. (2000). The influence of high heeled shoes on kinematics, kinetics, and muscle emg of normal female gait. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 16(3), 309-319.

DOI: 10.1123/jab.16.3.309

Google Scholar

[8] Roy, J. P., & Stefanyshyn, D. J. (2006). Shoe midsole longitudinal bending stiffness and running economy, joint energy, and emg. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38(3), 562.

DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000193562.22001.e8

Google Scholar

[9] Butler, R. J., Hamill, J., & Davis, I. (2007). Effect of footwear on high and low arched runners' mechanics during a prolonged run. Gait & Posture, 26(26), 219-225.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.09.015

Google Scholar

[10] Kaye, R. A. (1994). The extra-depth toe box: a rational approach. Foot & ankle international. / American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Ankle Society, 15(3), 146.

DOI: 10.1177/107110079401500310

Google Scholar

[11] Stewart, L., Gibson, J. N., & Thomson, C. E. (2007). In-shoe pressure distribution in unstable, (mbt) shoes and flat-bottomed training shoes: a comparative study. Gait & Posture, 25(4), 648.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.012

Google Scholar

[12] Sobhani, S. (2013). Rocker shoes for ankle and foot overuse injuries: a biomechanical and physiological evaluation. (Doctoral dissertation).

Google Scholar

[13] Guimaraes, R. M., & Isaacs, B. (1980). Characteristics of the gait in old people who fall. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2(4), 177-180.

DOI: 10.3109/09638288009163984

Google Scholar

[14] Fong, D. T., Pang, K. Y., Chung, M. M., Hung, A. S., & Chan, K. M. (2012). Evaluation of combined prescription of rocker sole shoes and custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. , 27(10), 1072.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.08.003

Google Scholar

[15] Glod, D. J., Fettinger, P., & Gibbons, R. W. (1996). A comparison of weightbearing pressures in various postoperative devices. Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 35(2), 149-154.

DOI: 10.1016/s1067-2516(96)80032-9

Google Scholar

[16] Carl, H. D., Pfander, D., & Swoboda, B. (2006). Assessment of plantar pressure in forefoot relief shoes of different designs. Foot & Ankle International, 27(2), 117-120.

DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700208

Google Scholar

[17] Murata, S., Abiko, T., Nakano, H., Sakamoto, M., Dai, M., & Kawaguchi, M. (2016). Development of insoles (shoe inserts) to improve the toe grip function. , 6(3), 139-143.

DOI: 10.9759/hppt.6.139

Google Scholar

[18] Fuller, E., Schroeder, S., & Edwards, J. (2001). Reduction of peak pressure on the forefoot with a rigid rocker-bottom postoperative shoe. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 91(10), 501-507.

DOI: 10.7547/87507315-91-10-501

Google Scholar

[19] Chapman, J. D., Preece, S., Braunstein, B., Höhne, A., Nester, C. J., & Brueggemann, P., et al. (2013).

Google Scholar

[20] Sobhani, S., Heuvel, E. V. D., Bredeweg, S., Kluitenberg, B., Postema, K., & Hijmans, J. M., et al. (2014). Effect of rocker shoes on plantar pressure pattern in healthy runners. Gait & Posture, 39(3), S1.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.005

Google Scholar

[21] Gert-Peter Brüggemann, Jan-Peter Goldmann, & Wolfgang Potthast. (2008). Effects and evaluation of functional footwear.

Google Scholar

[22] Goldmann, J. P., Sanno, M., & Willwacher, S. (2011). Effects of increased toe flexor muscle strength to foot and ankle function in walking, running and jumping. Footwear Science, 3(sup1), S59-S60.

DOI: 10.1080/19424280.2011.575811

Google Scholar

[23] Goldmann, J. P., & Brüggemann, G. P. (2012). The potential of human toe flexor muscles to produce force. Journal of Anatomy, 221(2), 187–194.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01524.x

Google Scholar

[24] Tanaka, T., Takeda, H., Izumi, T., Ino, S., & Ifukube, T. (1999). Effects on the location of the centre of gravity and the foot pressure contribution to standing balance associated with ageing. Ergonomics, 42(7), 997-1010.

DOI: 10.1080/001401399185261

Google Scholar

[25] Yang, C. R. (2007). Research on the planar pressure distribution during taijiquan exercise. Journal of Beijing Sport University.

Google Scholar

[26] Citaker, S., Gunduz, A. G., Guclu, M. B., Nazliel, B., Irkec, C., & Kaya, D. (2011). Relationship between foot sensation and standing balance in patients with multiple sclerosis. Gait & Posture, 34(2), 275-278.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.015

Google Scholar

[27] Forghany, S., Nester, C. J., & Richards, B. (2013). The effect of rollover footwear on the rollover function of walking. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 6(1), 24.

DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-24

Google Scholar

Scientific.Net is a registered brand of Trans Tech Publications Ltd
© 2024 by Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved