Surface Quality Prediction in Aluminum Extrusion

Article Preview

Abstract:

The surface quality of aluminium extrusion products can be hampered by undesired surface features like die lines and pickups. In particular the presence of pickups is considered as undesirable. Surface pickups appear as intermittent torn marks on the aluminium extrusion products, often terminated with a protruding lump rising above the surface up to hundreds of microns in height. Using a model calculating initiation, growth as well as detachment of the lumps on the die bearing surface, the surface quality of aluminium extrusion products can be predicted. The results of the model can be presented in terms of surface quality diagrams, where contour lines of the (normalized) calculated number of lumps are presented in terms of exit speed and extrudate surface temperature. These diagrams are unique for a certain combination of geometry of the extrudate and the aluminium alloy and can be used to optimise process conditions with respect to surface quality within a certain process window. In order to validate the model, the size and number of pickups on the surface of a labscale extruded strip of AA6063 have been measured. The results of the model are being compared to the experiments and show good agreement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

27-34

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] S. Tverlid, Modelling of friction in the bearing channel of dies for extrusion of aluminium sections, (PhD thesis Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway 1998).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Abtahi, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Extrusion Technology Seminar, Chicago USA (1996).

Google Scholar

[3] X. Ma, M.B. de Rooij, and D.J. Schipper, Tribology International Vol. 43 (2008), p.1138.

Google Scholar

[4] X. Ma, Surface Quality of aluminium extrusion products, (PhD thesis University of Twente, The Netherlands 2011).

Google Scholar

[5] M.B. de Rooij and D.J. Schipper, Journal of Tribology, Vol. 123 No. 3 (2001), p.474.

Google Scholar

[6] X. Ma , M.B. de Rooij and D.J. Schipper, Wear Vol. 269 (2009), p.790.

Google Scholar

[7] M.B. de Rooij and D.J. Schipper, 2001, Journal of Tribology, Vol. 123 No. 3 (2001). p.469.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Ernst, and M.E. Merchant, Transactions of the American Society of Metals. Vol. 29 (1941), p.299.

Google Scholar

[9] R.M. Saoubi, and H. Chandrasekaran, 2005, Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 54 (2005), p.59.

Google Scholar

[10] X.X. Yao, 2000, Journal of Materials Science Letters Vol. 19 (2000), p.733.

Google Scholar

[11] C.M. Sellars and W.J. Tegart, Metallurgy Reviews Vol. 17, p.1.

Google Scholar

[12] R.C. Picu, G. Vincze, F. Ozturk, J.J. Gracio, F. Barlat and A.M. Maniatty, Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 390 (2005), p.334.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.029

Google Scholar

[13] B. Verlinden, A. Suhadi, and L. Delaey, 1993, Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia Vol 28 (1993), p.1441.

DOI: 10.1016/0956-716x(93)90496-f

Google Scholar

[14] T. Sheppard, Extrusion of Aluminium Alloys, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands 1999).

Google Scholar

[15] N. Parson, C. Jowett, W. Fraser, and C. Pelow, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Aluminium Extrusion Technology Seminar, Chicago USA (1996).

Google Scholar