Fault Tree Analysis of Pantograph Type Current Collector Based on Ontology Modeling

Article Preview

Abstract:

Complex mass faults diagnosis of the pantograph type current collector was difficult. Based on the analysis of the structure, working principle and failure mode of the pantograph type current collector, fault tree of the pantograph was established. A lot of expert knowledge has been collected to support this diagnose process. Some serious problems such as ambiguity, uncertainty and inconsistency exist in the knowledge. Focused on the deficiencies, ontology modeling was proposed in this paper. StrOnto, FaultOnto and FTOnto were established to standardize the knowledge and to improve the efficiency of fault diagnosing. Finally, combined with the example of the pantograph type current collector of CRH2 EMU-train, the proposed algorithms proposed in this paper were proved reasonable and effective.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1371-1376

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Jiao Fengchuan, Wang Binjie. The management and maintenance of locomotive rolling stock [M]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University Press, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] Zong Gang, Zhang Chao, Wang Huasheng. Reliability study of the components for the traction system of high speed train based on complex network theory [J]. China Railway Science, 2014, 35(01): 94-97.

Google Scholar

[3] Chen Fengkun, Liu Zhigang, Han Zhiwei, et al. Pantograph slipper cracks identification based on translational parallel window in curvelet transform domain [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2012, 34(10): 43-47.

Google Scholar

[4] Song Longlong, Wang Taiyong, Song Xiaowen, et al. Fault diagnosis of pantograph type current collector of CRH2 electric multiple units based on Petri net modeling and fault tree analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2014, 35(09): 1990-(1997).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.693.1371

Google Scholar

[5] Halpin Harry, Presutti Valentina. The identity of resources on the Web: An ontology for Web architecture [J]. Applied Ontology, 2011, 06(03): 263-293.

DOI: 10.3233/ao-2011-0095

Google Scholar

[6] Maedche A, Motik B, Stojanovic L, et al. Ontologies for enterprise knowledge management [J]. IEEE Intelligent System, 2003, 18(02): 26-33.

DOI: 10.1109/mis.2003.1193654

Google Scholar

[7] Dan M. Shaev, Joseph Tiran. Condition-based fault tree analysis (CBFTA): A new method for improved fault tree analysis (FTA), reliability and safety calculations [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007(92): 1231-1241.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.015

Google Scholar

[8] Huang Hongzhong, Li Yanfeng, Sun Jian, et al. Fuzzy dynamic fault tree analysis for the solar array drive assembly [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(19): 70-76.

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2013.19.070

Google Scholar

[9] Ayhan Mentes, Ismail H. Helvacioglu.  An application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for spread mooring systems [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2010, 38(02): 285-294.

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.11.003

Google Scholar

[10] Nima Khakzad, Faisal Khan, Paul Amyotte. Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011, 96(08): 925-932.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012

Google Scholar