Paper Titles

Bond of Steel Bars to Masonry Mortar Joints: Test Results and Analytical Modelling
p.319

Pull-Out Tests on Injected Anchors in Tuff Masonry Elements
p.326

FRCM Strengthened Masonry Panels: The Role of Mechanical Anchorages and Symmetric Layouts
p.334

Confinement of Masonry Columns with Steel and Basalt FRCM Composites
p.342

Confinement of Clay Masonry Columns with SRG
p.350

Repair of Clay Brick Walls for out of Plane Loads by Means of FRCM
p.358

The Use of Carbon Fiber Cementitious Matrix Connection for the Strenghtening of Multiple-Leaves Masonry
p.366

Confinement of Full-Scale Masonry Columns with FRCM Systems
p.374

An Investigation of the Debonding Mechanism between FRCM Composites and a Masonry Substrate
p.382

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 747Confinement of Clay Masonry Columns with SRG

Confinement of Clay Masonry Columns with SRG

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, the behavior of clay masonry columns confined by steel reinforced grout (SRG) composite with a natural hydraulic lime mortar is investigated. An experimental study was carried out to understand the behavior of masonry prisms with a square cross-section confined by SRG composite jackets subjected to a monotonic concentric compressive load. Test parameters considered in this study are the density of steel fibers and column corner radius. The effectiveness of the confinement is studied in terms of load-bearing capacity with respect to unconfined columns.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Mechanics of Masonry Structures Strengthened with Composite Materials II

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 747)

Pages:

350-357

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.747.350

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2017

Authors:

Lesley H. Sneed*, Christian Carloni, Giulia Baietti, Giacomo Fraioli

Keywords:

Composites, Confinement, Masonry, Steel Reinforced Grout (SRG)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.G. Papanicolaou, T.C. Triantafillou, K. Karlos, M. Papathanasiou. Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: in-plane cyclic loading. Mater Struct 40 (2007) 1081-1097.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9207-8

[2] M. Corradi, A. Borri, G. Castori, R. Sisti. Shear strengthening of wall panels through jacketing with cement mortar reinforced by GFRP grids. Compos - Part B: Eng 64 (2014) 33–42.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.022

[3] M.R. Valluzzi, F. Daporto, E. Garbin, M. Panizza. Out-of-plane behavior of infill masonry panels strengthened with composite materials. Mater Struct 47 (2014) 2131-2145.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-014-0384-6

[4] S. Babaeidarabad, F. De Caso, A. Nanni. URM walls strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix composite subjected to diagonal compression. J Compos Constr 18: 2 (2013).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000441

[5] S. Babaeidarabad, F. Caso, A. Nanni. Out-of-plane behavior of URM walls strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix composite. J Compos Constr 18: 4 (2013).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000457

[6] V. Alecci, F. Focacci, L. Rovero, G. Stipo, M. De Stefano. Extrados strengthening of brick masonry arches with PBO-FRCM composites: experimental and analytical investigations. Compos Struct 149: 1 (2016) 184-196.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.030

[7] V. Giamundo, G.P. Lignola, G. Maddaloni, A. Balsamo, A. Prota, G. Manfredi. Experimental investigation of the seismic performances of IMG reinforcement on curved masonry elements. Compos - Part B: Eng 70 (2015) 53-63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.039

[8] V. Giamundo, G.P. Lignola, G. Maddaloni, F. da Porto, A. Prota, G. Manfredi. Shaking table tests on a full-scale unreinforced and IMG-retrofitted clay brick masonry barrel vault. Bull Earthquake Eng 14: 6 (2016) 1663-1693.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-9886-7

[9] G. Ramaglia, G.P. Lignola, A. Balsamo, A. Prota, G. Manfredi. Seismic strengthening of masonry vaults with abutments using Textile Reinforced Mortar. J Compos Constr, in press. DOI: 10. 1061/(ASCE)CC. 1943-5614. 000073.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000733

[10] L. Bednarz, A. Gorski, J. Jasienko, E. Rusinski. Simulations and analyses of arched brick structures. Autom Constr 20: 12 (2011) 741-754.

[11] Ł. Hojdys, P. Krajewski. Laboratory tests on masonry vaults with backfill strengthened at the extrados. Key Eng Mat 624 (2015) 510-517.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.624.510

[12] Carloni C., Mazzotti C., Savoia, M., and Subramaniam K.V. Confinement of masonry columns with FRCM composites. Key Eng Mat 624 (2015) 644-651.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.624.644

[13] De Santis, S., Casadei, P., De Canio, G., de Felice, G., Malena, M., Mongelli, M., and Roselli, I. Seismic performance of masonry walls retrofitted with steel reinforced grout. Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn., 45 (2016) 229–251.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2625

[14] A. D'Ambrisi, F. Focacci. Flexural strengthening of RC beams with cement-based composites, J Comp Constr 15: 5 (2011) 707-720.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000218

[15] Loreto, L. Leardini, D. Arboleda, A. Nanni. Performance of RC slab-type elements strengthened with fabric reinforced cementitious matrix composites. J Compos Constr 18: 3 (2013) 1–9.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000415

[16] C. Pellegrino, T. D'Antino. Experimental behavior of existing precast prestressed reinforced concrete elements strengthened with cementitious composites. Compos - Part B: Eng. 55 (2013) 31-40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.053

[17] L.H. Sneed, S. Verre, C. Carloni, C., L. Ombres. Flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with steel-FRCM composite. Eng Struct 127 (2016) 686-699.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.006

[18] M.Y. Alabdulhadya, L.H. Sneed, C. Carloni. Torsional behavior of RC beams strengthened with PBO-FRCM composite – an experimental study. Eng Struc 136 (2017) 393–405.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.044

[19] A. D'Ambrisi, L. Feo, F. Focacci, Experimental analysis on bond between PBO-FRCM strengthening materials and concrete, Compos - Part B: Eng. 44: 1 (2013) 524–32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.011

[20] T. D'Antino, C. Carloni, L.H. Sneed, C. Pellegrino. Matrix-fiber bond behavior in PBO FRCM composites – a fracture mechanics approach. Eng Frac Mech J 117 (2014) 94-111.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.011

[21] L.H. Sneed, T. D'Antino, C. Carloni. Investigation of bond behavior of PBO fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix-composite concrete interface. ACI Mat J 111: 5 (2014) 569-580.

DOI: 10.14359/51686604

[22] T. D'Antino, C. Carloni, L.H. Sneed, C. Pellegrino. Fatigue and post-fatigue behavior of PBO FRCM-concrete joints. Inter J Fatigue 81 (2015) 91-104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.008

[23] C. Carloni, T. D'Antino, L.H. Sneed, C. Pellegrino. Role of the matrix layers in the stress-transfer mechanism of FRCM composites bonded to a concrete substrate. ASCE J of Eng Mech 141: 6 (2015).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000883

[24] T. D'Antino, L.H. Sneed, C. Carloni, C. Pellegrino. Influence of the substrate characteristics on the bond behavior of PBO FRCM-concrete joints. Constr and Build Mat 101 (2015) 838-850.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.045

[25] L.H. Sneed, T. D'Antino, C. Carloni, C. Pellegrino. A comparison of the bond behavior of PBO-FRCM composites determined by single-lap and double-lap shear tests. Cem and Conc Compos 64 (2015) 37-48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.07.007

[26] T. D'Antino, L.H. Sneed, C. Carloni, C. Pellegrino. Effect of the inherent eccentricity in single-lap direct-shear tests of PBO FRCM-concrete joints. Compos Struct 142 (2016) 117–129.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.076

[27] C. Carloni, S. Verre, L.H. Sneed, L. Ombres. Loading rate effect on the debonding phenomenon in fiber reinforced cementitious matrix-concrete joints. Compos - Part B: Eng 108 (2017) 301–314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.087

[28] G. De Felice, S. De Santis, L. Garmendia, B. Ghiassi, P. Larrinaga, P.B. Lourenco, D.V. Oliveira, F. Paolacci, C.G. Papanicolaou. Mortar-based systems for externally bonded strengthening of masonry. Mater Struct 47 (2014) 2021-(2037).

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-014-0360-1

[29] G. Carozzi, C. Poggi, Mechanical properties and debonding strength of fabric reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) systems for masonry strengthening, Compos - Part B: Eng. 70 (2015) 215-230.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.056

[30] T.D. Krevaikas, T.C. Triantafillou. Masonry confinement with fiber-reinforced polymers. J Compos Constr 9: 2 (2005) 128–135.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2005)9:2(128)

[31] A. Borri, G. Castori, M. Corradi. Masonry columns confined by steel fiber composite wraps. Materials 4(1) (2011) 311-326.

DOI: 10.3390/ma4010311

[32] L. Ombres. Confinement effectiveness in eccentrically loaded masonry columns strengthened by fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) jackets. Key Eng Mat 624 (2015) 551-558.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.624.551

[33] ASTM C109/C109M-16a. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2016) 10 pp.

DOI: 10.1520/c0109_c0109m-20

[34] Kerakoll S. p.A. – web site: <www. kerakoll. com> [accessed Feb 2017].