Experimental and Numerical Investigation into Mixing Efficiency of Micromixers with Different Geometric Barriers

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper proposes a numerical and experimental investigation of mixing behaviors of two liquid samples in microchannels that are shaped into different geometric barriers. The micro-mixers utilized in this study are fabricated on low-cost glass slides using a simple and reliable fabrication process. Samples are driven by a hydrodynamic pump to lead them into the mixing section of the microchannels. The effects of mixing performance of various kinds of barrier shape are discussed in this study. The numerical and experimental results show that a better mixing efficiency can be obtained in the microchannels while using the elliptic-shape barriers in compare with the leaking side-channels. In this study, the simulated and experimental results are in good agreement. The investigation of mixing efficiency in microchannels with different geometric barriers could be crucial for microfluidic systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 505-507)

Pages:

391-396

Citation:

Online since:

January 2006

Export:

Price:

[1] R. Ashton, C. Padala and R. Kane: Current Opinion Biotechnology Vol. 14 (2003), p.479.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Kruger, K. Singh, A. O'Nel, C. Jackson, A. Morrison and P. O'Brien: Journal of Micromechanics and Micromachining Vol. 12 (2002), p.486.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. S. Shin, K. Cho, S.H. Lim, S. Chung, S.J. Park, C. Chung, D.C. Han and J.K. Chang: Journal of Micromechanics and Micromachining Vol. 13 (2003), p.768.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Khandurina, T.E. Mcknight, S.C. Jacobson, L.C. Waters, R.S. Foote and J.M. Ramsey: Analytical Chemistry Vol. 72 (2000), p.2995.

Google Scholar

[5] J.W. Hong, T. Fujii, M. Seki, T. Yamamoto and I. Endo: Electrophoresis Vol. 22 (2001), p.328.

Google Scholar

[6] F.G. Bessoth, A.J. deMello and A. Manz: Anal. Commun Vol. 36 (1999), p.213.

Google Scholar

[7] R.H. Liu, M.A. Stremler, K.V. Sharp, M.G. Olsen, J.G. Santiago, R.J. Adrian, H. Aref and D.J. Beebe: Journal of MEMS Vol. 9 (2000), p.190.

Google Scholar

[8] T.J. Johnson, D. Ross and L.E. Locascio: Analytical Chemistry Vol. 74 (2002), p.45.

Google Scholar

[9] A.D. Stroock, S.K.W. Dertinger, A. Ajdari, I. Mezić, H.A. Stone and G.M. Whitesides: Science Vol. 295 (2020), p.647.

Google Scholar

[10] B.J. Burke and F.E. Regnier: Analytical Chemistry Vol. 75 (2003), p.1786.

Google Scholar

[11] Y.C. Chung, Y.L. Hsu, C.P. Jen, M.C. Lu and Y.C. Lin: Lab on a Chip Vol. 4 (2004), p.70.

Google Scholar

[12] D.S. Kim, I.H. Lee, T.H. Kwon and D.W. Cho: Journal of Micromechanics and Micromachining Vol. 14 (2004), p.1294.

Google Scholar

[13] D. Gobby, P. Angeli and A. Gavriilidis: Journal of Micromechanics and Micromachining Vol. 11 (2001), p.126.

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Mingqiang and H.H. Bau: Proc. ASME Intl. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Expositio, MEMS 2000 Vol. 2 (2000), p.489.

Google Scholar

[15] C.C. Chang and R.J. Yang: Journal of Micromechanics and Micromachining Vol. 14 (2004), p.550.

Google Scholar

[16] B.P. Leonard: Proc. Intl. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Laminar and Turbulent Flow Vol. 1 (1987).

Google Scholar

[17] J.P. van Doormal and G.D. Raithby: Numerical Heat Transfer Vol. 7 (1984), p.147.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Hardt and F. Schonfeld: AIChE Journal Vol. 49 (2003), p.578.

Google Scholar

[19] L.M. Fu and C.H. Lin: Analytical Chemistry Vol. 75 (2003), p.5790.

Google Scholar

[20] C.H. Lin, L.M. Fu and Y.S. Chien: Analytical Chemistry Vol. 76 (2004), p.5265.

Google Scholar