Effects of TIG Process on Corrosion Resistance of 321 Stainless Steel Welding Joint

Dan Hu; Shu Lin Li; Sheng Lu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.749.173

Paper Titles

Effect of High Density Pulsing Current on Mechanical Properties of Fe-6.5wt.%Si Alloy Sheet
p.151

Effect of Mixing Method on Microstructure of SiCp/Al Composites
p.157

The Intelligent Control Method of the Density of the Metal Injection Molding Billet Based on ANN
p.161

Study on the Interface Diffusion Bonding of the Copper Alloy/30CrMnSi Steel
p.168

Effects of TIG Process on Corrosion Resistance of 321 Stainless Steel Welding Joint
p.173

Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Mg Alloy FSW Joint Characterized with Asymmetric Gradient in Three Dimension
p.180

Cryogenic Treatment of 06Cr19Ni10 Austenitic Stainless Steel
p.187

Magnetic Properties and Morphology of the Cobalt Particles Prepared in Different Liquid Solvent
p.192

Effects of In/Ce to Sn-3.5Ag Lead-Free Solder on Microstructures and Properties
p.198

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 749Effects of TIG Process on Corrosion Resistance of...

Effects of TIG Process on Corrosion Resistance of 321 Stainless Steel Welding Joint

Abstract:

In this paper, the effects of different TIG welding parameters on corrosion resistance of 321austenitic stainless steel welding joint were studied. Intergranular corrosion, stress-strain curves of SSRT and the fracture surface of the welding joint were investigated by means of intergranular corrosion test, SCC test and SEM. The results showed that the intergranular corrosion cracks did not occur for all joints welded in the range of TIG welding current of 130A~190A. In pure water at room temperature, strain rate at the range of 1×10^-5 s^-1~1×10^-6 s^-1 had little effect on the maximum tensile strength of the material under the same welding conditions and the time of joint fracture increased as the strain rate decreased. At strain rate of 1×10^-6 s^-1, the maximum tensile strength of the joint welded in the current of 130A and 150A decreased significantly in the dyeing assistant and presented stress corrosion sensitivity. Joints welded in the current of 170A and 190A, showed excellent resistance to stress corrosion. Through the analysis of the fracture surface of joints, the joint welded in current of 130A presented a tendency to brittle fracture, while the joints in the current of 170 A and190 A were characterized with ductile fracture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials Performance, Modeling and Simulation

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 749)

Pages:

173-179

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.749.173

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2013

Authors:

Dan Hu, Shu Lin Li, Sheng Lu

Keywords:

321 Strainless Steel, IGC, SSRT, TIG

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] F. Huang, X.L. Hu, The Reason of Corrosion of Austenitic Stainless Steel Pressure Vessels and Prewention[J], GuangZhou Chemical Industry, 38(4) (2010) 180-181.

Google Scholar

[2] R.B. Wang, The Reason of 18-8 Austenitic Steel Cankered [J]. Hardnees Science and Technology, 30(3) (2002) 10-12.

Google Scholar

[3] Y.K. Bi, X.J. Wang, Study on Intergranular Corrosion of Welded Joint of 321 and 310 Austenitic Stainless Steel[J], Hot Working Technology, 40(9) (2011) 150-151, 154.

Google Scholar

[4] S.G. Qian, G. You, The Analysis of Corrosion Cause of Austenitic Stainless Steel (1Cr18Ni9Ti)Tubular Product in Media Containing Chloride-ion, 37(1) (2012) 25-26, 29.

Google Scholar

[5] J.Z. Liu, Stress Corrosion and Protection of Austenitic Stainless Steel[J], Ptero-Chemical Equipment Technology, 31(4) (2010) 49-53.

Google Scholar

[6] X.Y. Lin, Evaluation and Control of the Austenitic 18-8 Srainless Steel Welded Joint Intergranular Corrosion[J], Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Par A: Physical Testing, 43(5) (2007) 236-238, 241.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Ji, Austenite Stainless Steel Weldablity Brief Analysis[J], Coal Mine Machinery, 29(7) (2008) 85-86.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Z. Zhen, Welding metallurgy[M], Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 1 (1995) 67-85.

Google Scholar

[9] B.Q. Chen, The influence of welding speed on morphology of welded joints of 18-8 stainless steel[J], Research On Iron and Steel, 8(4) (2003) 43-45.

Google Scholar

[10] H.J. Xu, Microstructures and mechanical properties of welding joint of 1. 4003 ferritic stainless steel and 0Cr18Ni9 austenitic stainless steel[J], Welding Technology, 16(6) (2008) 12-14.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2012.1013.1019

Google Scholar