Structural Properties of Concrete Containing Ground Waste Clay Brick Powder as Partial Substitute for Cement

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the increasing concerns on the impact of cement production on the environment and the need to protect the environment, the use of mineral additives as cementitious material to partially substitute cement is being considered as an effective option. One of such material is fired clay brick which can be sourced as generated waste from clay brick industry. This has an added advantage of reducing industrial waste and preserving the natural resources. The experimental objective of this study is to examine the possibility of utilizing clay brick waste as partial replacement for Portland cement in concrete. The clay brick was finely ground into powder size, and after grinding, the morphological characterization of the powder materials was carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Moreover, the chemical composition of the brick material was determined using X-ray fluorescence (XRF). Laboratory tests were carried out to determine the workability, split tensile and compressive strength properties of the concrete with 0%, 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% partial replacement of cement with ground clay brick (CB). From the test results, the chemical composition of the brick powder meets the standard requirements for pozzolanic material, with the SEM revealing an amorphous solid mass. The workability of the concrete reduces with increase in brick powder content. A significant improvement of the split tensile and compressive strength of the concrete was achieved at 10% cement replacement, after which a decrease in strength with increasing ground clay brick content was recorded. The use of ground clay brick of not more than 15% was recommended for concrete production.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

63-67

Citation:

Online since:

August 2016

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Pappu, M. Saxena, S.R. Asolekar. Solid wastes generation in India and their recycling potential in building materials. Building and Environment, 42 (2007) 2311-2320.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.015

Google Scholar

[2] G. Baronio, L. Binda. Study of the pozzolanicity of some bricks and clays. Construction and Building Materials, 11(1997) 41–46.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(96)00032-3

Google Scholar

[3] B. Uzal, L. Turanli. Studies on blended cements containing a high volume of natural pozzolans. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(2003) 1777–1781.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00173-x

Google Scholar

[4] F. Bektas, W. Kejin, H. Ceylan. Use of ground clay bricks as a pozzolanic materials in concrete, Journal ASTM International. 5 (2008) ISSN 1546-962X.

DOI: 10.1520/jai101681

Google Scholar

[5] M. Schneider, M. Romer, M. Tschudin, H. Bolio. Sustainable cement production –present and future. Cement and Concrete Research, 43 (2011) 642–50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019

Google Scholar

[6] R. Kaminskas, J. Mituzas, A. Kaminskas. The effect of pozzolana on the properties of the finest fraction of separated Portland cement. Ceramics, 50 (2006) 15–21.

Google Scholar

[7] M. O'Farrell, S. Wild, B.B. Sabir. Resistance to chemical attack of ground brick-PC mortar part I. Sodium Sulphate solution. Cement and Concrete Research, 29 (1999) 781–90.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(99)00170-2

Google Scholar

[8] K. Kartini, M.N. Rohaidah, Z.A. Zuraini. Performance of ground clay bricks as partial cement replacement in grade 30 concrete. Int. J. Civil, Env. Struc. Const. & Arch. Eng. 6(2012) 569-72.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Naceri, M. ChikoucheHamina. Use of waste brick as a partial replacement of cement in mortar. Waste management, 29 (2009) 2378 – 2384.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.026

Google Scholar

[10] C. He, E. Makovicky, B. Osaeck. Thermal stability and pozzolanic activity of calcined kaolin. Applied Clay Science, 9 (1994) 165–187.

DOI: 10.1016/0169-1317(94)90018-3

Google Scholar

[11] L. Wang, R.K. Scals, A. Roy. Investigation of utilization of amorphous silica residues as supplementary cementing materials. Advanced Cement Research, 13 (2001) 85–89.

DOI: 10.1680/adcr.2001.13.2.85

Google Scholar

[12] J.P. Goncalves, L.M. Tavares, R.D. Toledo Filho, E.M.R. Fairbairn. Performance evaluation of cement mortars modified with Metakaolin or ground brick. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (2009) 1971–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.027

Google Scholar

[13] BS EN 12350-2. Testing of Fresh concrete; part 2: slump test. European Committee for Standardization; (2009).

Google Scholar

[14] BS EN 12390-3. Testing hardened concrete; part 3: compressive strength of test specimens. European Committee for Standardization; (2002).

Google Scholar

[15] BS EN 12390-6. Testing hardened concrete; part 6: split tensile strength of test specimens. European Committee for Standardization; (2002).

Google Scholar

[16] ASTM C618. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. American society for testing and materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; (2003).

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-15

Google Scholar