Parameter Identification and Modeling of Hardening to Preserve Identical Predictions under Monotonic Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

Advanced hardening models accurately describe the transient plastic behavior (reyielding, stagnation, resumption...) after various strain-path changes (reverse, orthogonal...). However, a common drawback of these models is that they usually predict monotonic loading with lower accuracy than the regular isotropic hardening models. Consequently, the finite element predictions using these models may sometimes lose in accuracy, in spite of their tremendous theoretical superiority. This drawback has been eliminated in the literature for the Chaboche isotropic-kinematic hardening model. In this work, a generic approach is proposed for advanced hardening models. Arbitrary models could be successfully compensated to preserve rigorously identical predictions under monotonic loading. A physically-based model involving a 4th order tensor and two 2nd order tensors was used for the demonstration. The parameter identification procedure was greatly simplified by rigorously decoupling the identification of isotropic hardening parameters from the other parameters.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2258-2265

Citation:

Online since:

July 2022

Export:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Yoshida and T. Uemori, A model of large-strain cyclic plasticity describing the Bauschinger effect and work hardening stagnation, Int. J. Plast., vol. 18, no. 5–6, Art. no. 5–6, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(01)00050-x

Google Scholar

[2] F. Barlat, G. Vincze, J. Grácio, M.-G. Lee, E. Rauch, and C. Tomé, Enhancements of homogenous anisotropic hardening model and application to mild and dual-phase steels, Int. J. Plast., vol. 58, p.201–218, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.002

Google Scholar

[3] T. Clausmeyer, A. Güner, A. E. Tekkaya, V. Levkovitch, and B. Svendsen, Modeling and finite element simulation of loading-path-dependent hardening in sheet metals during forming, Int. J. Plast., vol. 63, p.64–93, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.01.011

Google Scholar

[4] H. Haddadi, S. Bouvier, M. Banu, C. Maier, and C. Teodosiu, Towards an accurate description of the anisotropic behaviour of sheet metals under large plastic deformations: modelling, numerical analysis and identification, Int. J. Plast., vol. 22, no. 12, Art. no. 12, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.010

Google Scholar

[5] S. Cooreman and S. Coppieters, On solving inconsistencies between different types of hardening models, Complas 2021, Barcelona, Spain, 7-9 september (2021).

DOI: 10.23967/complas.2021.055

Google Scholar

[6] B. Chun, J. Jinn, and J. Lee, Modeling the Bauschinger effect for sheet metals, part I: theory, Int. J. Plast., vol. 18, no. 5–6, Art. no. 5–6, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(01)00046-8

Google Scholar

[7] J. Carbonniere, S. Thuillier, F. Sabourin, M. Brunet, and P.-Y. Manach, Comparison of the work hardening of metallic sheets in bending–unbending and simple shear, Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 51, no. 2, Art. no. 2, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.12.006

Google Scholar

[8] C. Teodosiu and Z. Hu, Evolution of the intragranular microstructure at moderate and large strains: modelling and computational significance, Simul. Mater. Process. Theory Methods Appl., p.173–182, (1995).

Google Scholar

[9] B. Haddag, T. Balan, and F. Abed-Meraim, Investigation of advanced strain-path dependent material models for sheet metal forming simulations, Int. J. Plast., vol. 23, no. 6, Art. no. 6, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.10.004

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Yang, G. Vincze, C. Baudouin, H. Chalal and T. Balan, Strain-path dependent hardening models with rigorously identical predictions under monotonic loading, Mech. Research Comm. 114 (2021) 103615.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103615

Google Scholar