Korean J Urol. 2007 Apr;48(4):408-415. Korean.
Published online Apr 30, 2007.
Copyright © 2007 The Korean Urological Association
Original Article

Predictive Variables of the Progression to Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer after Combined Androgen Blockade

Seung Chol Park, Han Yong Choi,1 Choung Soo Kim,2 Sung Joon Hong,3 Wun Jae Kim,4 Sang Eun Lee,5 Jae Mann Song,6 Jin Han Yoon,7 and Joung Sik Rim
    • Department of Urology, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea.
    • 1Department of Urology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
    • 2Department of Urology, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.
    • 3Department of Urology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
    • 4Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
    • 5Department of Urology, Seoul National University, Seongnam, Korea.
    • 6Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
    • 7Department of Urology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Received February 14, 2007; Accepted March 26, 2007.

Abstract

Purpose

Despite of the effectiveness of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, it progress to androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC) after various periods of time. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical and pathological variables that predict progression to AIPC after combined androgen blockade (CAB).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 343 patients who were treated with CAB for prostate cancer. Binary logistic regression test was used to analyze the independent predictors for the progression to AIPC. The time to AIPC, according to variables, was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the variables were compared using the Log-Rank test.

Results

The mean follow-up was 42.1 months (range: 12-120). Seventy seven patients (33.3%) experienced progression to AIPC at a median of 20.2 months (range: 6-72). On univariate analysis, the percentage of positive prostate biopsies, the Gleason score, the T stage, the extent of bone metastasis, lymph node metastasis, the pretreatment PSA level, the nadir PSA and the PSA level at 3 and 6 months all had a significant relationship with the progression to AIPC. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the nadir PSA showed that the optimal cut-off point to predict progression to AIPC was 0.5ng/ml with an area under curve of 0.769. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the Gleason score (>7), the nadir PSA (>0.5ng/ml), and the PSA level at 6 months (>4.0ng/ml) were significantly correlated with the progression to AIPC.

Conclusions

This study suggested that Gleason score, the nadir PSA and the PSA level at 6 months were independent variables to predict progression to AIPC after CAB. The PSA level at 6 months may be the most accurate variable to predict progression to AIPC.

Keywords
Prostate cancer; Hormone; Progression

Figures

Fig. 1
Study Schema. CAB: combined androgen blockade, AIPC: androgen independent prostate cancer.

Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of the nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to predict progression to androgen independent prostate cancer. AUC: area under curve.

Fig. 3
Time to progression to androgen independent prostate cancer according to the T stage, the extent of bone metastasis, the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the nadir PSA, the PSA level at 3 months and the PSA level at 6 months.

Tables

Table 1
Baseline descriptive characteristics of the 231 patients

Table 2
Univariate analysis of the quantitative variables according to the progression to androgen independent prostate cancer

Table 3
Univariate analysis of the distribution of qualitative variables according to the progression to androgen independent prostate cancer

Table 4
Binary logistic regression analysis of the predictive variables of androgen independent prostate cancer

References

    1. Ministry of Health and Welfare Republic of Korea. 2002 Annual Report of the Korea Central Cancer Registry. 2002. pp. 11-14.
    1. Korea National Statistical Office. Annual report on the cause of death statistics (based on vital registration).
    1. Derweesh IH, Kupelian PA, Zippe C, Levin HS, Brainard J, Magi-Galluzzi C, et al. Continuing trends in pathological stage migration in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Oncol 2004;22:300–306.
    1. Denis LJ, Keuppens F, Smith PH, Whelan P, deMoura JL, Newling D, et al. Maximal androgen blockade: final analysis of EORTC phase III trial 30853. EORTC Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group and the EORTC Data Center. Eur Urol 1998;33:144–151.
    1. Kawakami J, Cowan JE, Elkin EP, Latini DM, DuChane J, Carroll PR, et al. Androgen-deprivation therapy as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: data from Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE). Cancer 2006;106:1708–1714.
    1. Dijkman GA, Janknegt RA, De Reijke TM, Debruyne FM. Long-term efficacy and safety of nilutamide plus castration in advanced prostate cancer, and the significance of early prostate specific antigen normalization. J Urol 1997;158:160–163.
    1. Denis LJ, Carnelro de Moura JL, Bono A, Sylvester R, Whelan P, Newling D, et al. EORTC GU Group and EORTC Data Center. Goserelin acetate and flutamide versus bilateral orchiectomy: phase III EORTC trial (30853). Urology 1993;42:119–129.
    1. Kim KH, Seo YJ, Lee KS. The factors affecting prognosis in patients with metastatic prostate cancer after hormonal therapy. Korean J Urol 2004;45:24–28.
    1. Benaim EA, Pace CM, Lam PM, Roehrborn CG. Nadir prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer. Urology 2002;59:73–78.
    1. Kwak C, Jeong SJ, Park MS, Lee E, Lee SE. Prognostic significance of the nadir prostate specific antigen level after hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2002;168:995–1000.
    1. Park BJ, Lee YG, Ahn HK. Prognostic significance of prostate-specific antigen level two months after maximal androgen blockade in metastatic prostate cancer. Korean J Urol 2003;44:855–860.
    1. Morote J, Trilla E, Esquena S, Abascal JM, Reventos J. Nadir prostate-specific antigen best predicts the progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2004;108:877–881.
    1. Cooper EH, Armitage TG, Robinson MR, Newling DW, Richards BR, Smith PH, et al. Prostate specific antigen and the prediction of prognosis in metastatic prostatic cancer. Cancer 1990;66(5 Suppl):1025–1028.
    1. Miller JI, Ahmann FR, Drach GW, Emerson SS, Botaccini MR. The clinical usefulness of serum prostate specific antigen after hormonal therapy of metastatic prostate cancer. J Urol 1992;147:956–961.
    1. Daver A, Soret JY, Coblentz Y, Allain YM, Cellier P, Chauveau P. The usefulness of prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in clinical practice. Am J Clin Oncol 1988;11 Suppl 2:S53–S60.
    1. Lee SY, Kim YS, Hong SJ. Clinical response of combined androgen blockade in metastatic prostate cancers. Korean J Urol 2000;41:361–366.
    1. Oosterlinck W, Mattelaer J, Casselman J, Van Velthoven R, Derde MP, Kaufman L. PSA evolution: a prognostic factor during treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma with total androgen blockade. Data from a Belgian multicentric study of 546 patients. Acta Urol Belg 1997;65:63–67.
    1. Benaim EA, Pace CM, Roehrborn CG. Gleason score predicts androgen independent progression after androgen deprivation therapy. Eur Urol 2002;42:12–17.
    1. Janoff DM, Peterson C, Mongoue-Tchokote S, Peters L, Beer TM, Wersinger EM, et al. Clinical outcomes of androgen deprivation as the sole therapy for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. BJU Int 2005;96:503–507.
    1. Morote J, Esquena S, Abascal JL, Trilla E, Cecchini L, Raventos CX, et al. Usefulness of prostate-specific antigen nadir as predictor of androgen-independent progression of metastatic prostate cancer. Int J Biol Markers 2005;20:209–216.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 3

Tables

1 / 4

PERMALINK