We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Research Article

SWATH acquisition mode for drug metabolism and metabolomics investigations

    Ron Bonner

    Ron Bonner Consulting, Newmarket, ON, Canada

    &
    Gérard Hopfgartner

    *Author for correspondence:

    E-mail Address: gerard.hopfgartner@unige.ch

    Life Sciences Mass Spectrometry, Department of Inorganic & Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2016-0141

    Aim: Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment-ion spectra (SWATH) has recently emerged as a powerful high resolution mass spectrometric data independent acquisition technique. In the present work, the potential and challenges of an integrated strategy based on LC-SWATH/MS for simultaneous drug metabolism and metabolomics studies was investigated. Methodology: The richness of SWATH data allows numerous data analysis approaches, including: detection of metabolites by prediction; metabolite detection by mass defect filtering; quantification from high-resolution MS precursor chromatograms or fragment chromatograms. Multivariate analysis can be applied to the data from the full scan or SWATH windows and allows changes in endogenous metabolites as well as xenobiotic metabolites, to be detected. Principal component variable grouping detects intersample variable correlation and groups variables with similar profiles which simplifies interpretation and highlights related ions and fragments. Principal component variable grouping can extract product ion spectra from the data collected by fragmenting a wide precursor ion window. Conclusion: It was possible to characterize 28 vinpocetine metabolites in urine, mostly mono- and di-hydroxylated forms, and detect endogenous metabolite expression changes in urine after the administration of a single dose of a model drug (vinpocetine) to rats.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    References

    • 1 Kaddurah-Daouk R, Weinshilboum RM. Pharmacometabolomics Research N. Pharmacometabolomics: implications for clinical pharmacology and systems pharmacology. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 95(2), 154–167 (2014).
    • 2 Wen B, Zhu MS. Applications of mass spectrometry in drug metabolism: 50 years of progress. Drug. Metabol. Rev. 47(1), 71–87 (2015).
    • 3 Wrona M, Mauriala T, Bateman KP, Mortishire-Smith RJ, O'Connor D. ‘All-in-one’ analysis for metabolite identification using liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry with collision energy switching. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 19(18), 2597–2602 (2005).
    • 4 Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11(6), O111 016717 (2012). •• Initial paper presenting the application of SWATH workflow for peptides quantification.
    • 5 Collins BC, Gillet LC, Rosenberger G et al. Quantifying protein interaction dynamics by SWATH mass spectrometry: application to the 14–3–3 system. Nat. Meth. 10(12), 1246–1253 (2013).
    • 6 Rosenberger G, Koh CC, Guo T et al. A repository of assays to quantify 10,000 human proteins by SWATH-MS. Sci. Data 1, 140031 (2014).
    • 7 Haverland NA, Fox HS, Ciborowski P. Quantitative proteomics by SWATH-MS reveals altered expression of nucleic acid binding and regulatory proteins in HIV-1-infected macrophages. J. Proteome Res. 13(4), 2109–2119 (2014).
    • 8 Grobbler C, Virdis B, Nouwens A, Harnisch F, Rabaey K, Bond PL. Use of SWATH mass spectrometry for quantitative proteomic investigation of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms grown on graphite cloth electrodes. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 38(2), 135–139 (2015).
    • 9 Bruderer R, Bernhardt OM, Gandhi T et al. Extending the limits of quantitative proteome profiling with data-independent acquisition and application to acetaminophen-treated three-dimensional liver microtissues. Mol. Cell. Prot. 14(5), 1400–1410 (2015).
    • 10 Zhang Y, Bilbao A, Bruderer T et al. The use of variable Q1 isolation windows improves selectivity in LC-SWATH-MS acquisition. J. Proteome Res. 14(10), 4359–4371 (2015).
    • 11 Hopfgartner G, Tonoli D, Varesio E. High-resolution mass spectrometry for integrated qualitative and quantitative analysis of pharmaceuticals in biological matrices. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402(8), 2587–2596 (2012). •• Paper describing the application of SWATH for low molecular weight compounds.
    • 12 Zhu XC, Chen YP, Subramanian R. Comparison of information-dependent acquisition, SWATH, and MSAll techniques in metabolite identification study employing ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 86(2), 1202–1209 (2014).
    • 13 Roemmelt AT, Steuer AE, Poetzsch M, Kraemer T. Liquid chromatography, in combination with a quadrupole time-of-flight instrument (LC QTOF), with sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment-ion spectra (SWATH) acquisition: systematic studies on its use for screenings in clinical and forensic toxicology and comparison with information-dependent acquisition (IDA). Anal. Chem. 86(23), 11742–11749 (2014).
    • 14 Arnhard K, Gottschall A, Pitterl F, Oberacher H. Applying ‘sequential windowed acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion mass spectra’ (SWATH) for systematic toxicological analysis with liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 407(2), 405–414 (2015).
    • 15 Scheidweiler KB, Jarvis MJ, Huestis MA. Nontargeted SWATH acquisition for identifying 47 synthetic cannabinoid metabolites in human urine by liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 407(3), 883–897 (2015).
    • 16 Roemmelt AT, Steuer AE, Kraemer T. Liquid chromatography, in combination with a quadrupole time-of-flight instrument, with sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment-ion spectra acquisition: validated quantification of 39 antidepressants in whole blood as part of a simultaneous screening and quantification procedure. Anal. Chem. 87(18), 9294–9301 (2015).
    • 17 Siegel D, Meinema AC, Permentier H, Hopfgartner G, Bischoff R. Integrated quantification and identification of aldehydes and ketones in biological samples. Anal. Chem. 86(10), 5089–5100 (2014).
    • 18 Ma Y, Tanaka N, Vaniya A, Kind T, Fiehn O. Ultrafast polyphenol metabolomics of red wines using MicroLC–MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 64(2), 505–512 (2016).
    • 19 Tsugawa H, Cajka T, Kind T et al. MS-DIAL: data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat. Meth. 12(6), 523–526 (2015).
    • 20 Cajka T, Fiehn O. Toward merging untargeted and targeted methods in mass spectrometry-based metabolomics and lipidomics. Anal. Chem. 88(1), 524–545 (2016).
    • 21 Rost HL, Rosenberger G, Navarro P et al. OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Nat. Biotechnol. 32(3), 219–223 (2014).
    • 22 Tsou CC, Avtonomov D, Larsen B et al. DIA-Umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat. Meth. 12(3), 258–264, 257 p following 264 (2015).
    • 23 Chen C, Gonzalez FJ, Idle JR. LC–MS-based metabolomics in drug metabolism. Drug. Metab. Rev. 39(2–3), 581–597 (2007).
    • 24 Vereczkey L. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of vincamine and related compounds. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 10(2), 89–103 (1985). • Describing the metabolism of vinpocetine.
    • 25 Xiao JF, Zhou B, Ressom HW. Metabolite identification and quantitation in LC–MS/MS-based metabolomics. Trends Anal. Chem. 32(0), 1–14 (2012).
    • 26 Bilbao A, Varesio E, Luban J et al. Processing strategies and software solutions for data-independent acquisition in mass spectrometry. Proteomics 15(5–6), 964–980 (2015). • Review presenting processing strategies and software solutions for data independent acquisition.
    • 27 Hopfgartner G. Can MS fully exploit the benefits of fast chromatography? Bioanalysis 3(2), 121–123 (2011).
    • 28 Zhu M, Ma L, Zhang D et al. Detection and characterization of metabolites in biological matrices using mass defect filtering of liquid chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry data. Drug Metab. Dispos. 34(10), 1722–1733 (2006).
    • 29 Burton L, Ivosev G, Tate S, Impey G, Wingate J, Bonner R. Instrumental and experimental effects in LC–MS-based metabolomics. J. Chromatogr. B 871(2), 227–235 (2008).
    • 30 Ivosev G, Burton L, Bonner R. Dimensionality reduction and visualization in principal component analysis. Anal. Chem. 80(13), 4933–4944 (2008). •• Work presenting the concept of principal component variable grouping.
    • 31 Vinaixa M, Schymanski EL, Neumann S, Navarro M, Salek RM, Yanes O. Mass spectral databases for LC/MS and GC/MS-based metabolomics: state of the field and future prospects. Trends Anal. Chem. 28(5), 550–561 (2015).
    • 32 Hopfgartner G, Varesio E, Burton L, Duchoslav E, Bonner R. SWATH libraries and common fragment libraries for metabolites identification in urine. Presented at: 62nd Annual ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics. Baltimore, MD, USA, 15–19 June 2014.