DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I4A78

Rationale and design of a large registry on renal denervation: the Global SYMPLICITY registry

Michael Böhm1*, MD; Felix Mahfoud1, MD; Christian Ukena1, MD; Axel Bauer2, MD; Eckart Fleck3, MD; Uta C. Hoppe4, MD; Ulrich Kintscher5, MD; Krzysztof Narkiewicz6, MD, PhD; Manuela Negoita7, MD; Luis Ruilope8, MD, PhD; L. Christian Rump9, MD; Markus Schlaich10, MD; Roland Schmieder11, MD; Horst Sievert12, MD; Joachim Weil13, MD; Bryan Williams14, MD; Uwe Zeymer15, MD; Giuseppe Mancia16, MD, PhD

Abstract

Aims: Hypertension is a global healthcare concern associated with a wide range of comorbidities. The recognition that elevated sympathetic drive plays an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension led to the use of renal artery denervation to interrupt the efferent and afferent sympathetic nerves between the brain and kidneys to lower blood pressure. Clinical trials of the Symplicity™ renal denervation system have demonstrated that radiofrequency ablation of renal artery nerves is safe and significantly lowers blood pressure in patients with severe resistant (systolic BP >160 mmHg) hypertension. Smaller ancillary studies in hypertensive patients suggest a benefit from renal denervation in a variety of conditions such as chronic kidney disease, glucose intolerance, sleep apnoea and heart failure.

Methods and results: The Global SYMPLICITY registry, which incorporates the GREAT SYMPLICITY registry initiated in Germany, is being conducted worldwide to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with the Symplicity renal denervation system in real-world uncontrolled hypertensive patients, looking first at subjects with severe resistant hypertension to confirm the results of prior clinical trials, but then also subjects with a wider range of baseline blood pressure and coexisting comorbidities.

Conclusions: The rationale, design and first baseline data from the Global SYMPLICITY registry are presented.

Abbreviations

EQ-5D: European quality of life - 5 dimensions

HTN: hypertension

SBP: systolic blood pressure

Introduction

Hypertension represents a global healthcare problem1 with a major impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality2,3 that imposes a large economic burden on healthcare systems4. It accounts for 40% of deaths from ischaemic heart disease and 51% of all stroke deaths worldwide2,4. Hypertension is associated with additional morbidities such as congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral arterial disease5,6. Resistant hypertension is a condition in which, despite treatment with at least three drugs (one being a diuretic) at appropriate doses and sufficient medical adherence, blood pressure goals are not achieved (<140/90 mmHg)5-8 and ambulatory blood pressure remains elevated9. Patients with resistant hypertension are at especially high risk for cardiovascular events, and other comorbidities such as sleep apnoea, diabetes mellitus and psychosocial disorders are more frequent in these patients10,11.

It is widely accepted that sympathetic hyperactivity plays an important role in the development and maintenance of hypertension12-14, and it has been increasingly implicated in treatment resistance15,16. The kidneys provide afferent signals to the central nervous system, with a reflex sympathetic activation, a generalised vasoconstriction and a pronounced increase in blood pressure17,18. Renal afferent denervation prevents or delays hypertension in experimental animal models18 and in the kidneys sympathetic efferent outflow increases markedly, via alpha-1 and beta-1 receptors, vascular resistance, renin release from the juxtaglomerular cells and tubular sodium reabsorption19-21. Therefore, it appears plausible that interrupting the interaction between the brain and the kidneys to inhibit sympathetic stimulation could reduce blood pressure and related adverse outcomes15,22.

Recently, an interventional technique became available aimed at interrupting afferent and efferent signals from sympathetic nerves located in the adventitia of the renal arteries22. The Symplicity HTN trial programme was started to test the hypothesis that application of radio-frequency energy in the renal arteries can reduce blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. The proof-of-concept study was the Symplicity HTN-1 trial, showing a significant and sustained blood pressure reduction23, as confirmed by long-term follow-up studies up to 24 months24. Symplicity HTN-2 was a randomised parallel group trial in patients with severe resistant hypertension (systolic BP >160 mmHg), showing systolic blood pressure reduction of 32 mmHg at six months after treatment but no change in the control group25. After 12 months, the blood pressure reduction was similar to that observed after one month with similar responses in the crossover (former control) group26. The ongoing Symplicity HTN-3 trial will include 530 patients in the USA, with a sham procedure applied in the control group27.

Ancillary studies have shown that, in patients with metabolic syndrome and resistant hypertension, glucose tolerance is improved due to a favourable impact on insulin resistance28. Renal denervation also reduces resistive indices in the kidneys and is able to improve urinary albumin excretion29. After renal denervation, a reduction of pulse wave reflection, pulse pressure and central as well as peripheral blood pressure has been observed30. In the heart, blood pressure reduction by renal sympathetic denervation was associated with a reduction of LV mass and an improvement in diastolic function31. While a reduction in heart rate has been observed32, the chronotropic response to exercise was maintained33. Finally, the procedure might be useful in other conditions commonly associated with increased sympathetic activation such as polycystic ovary syndrome34, renal failure35, sleep apnoea36,37, and electrical storm38.

While the limited number of patients included in the Symplicity HTN studies23-25 might provide evidence for efficacy, clearly larger populations are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the procedure more comprehensively. Furthermore, since renal denervation is an interventional technology, which can potentially cause harm and is costly, a large database is necessary to study safety and efficacy in specific subgroups.

Given that an increasing number of patients are treated in clinical practice with renal denervation, the GREAT SYMPLICITY registry was initiated in Germany and is now embedded in the larger Global SYMPLICITY registry being conducted worldwide in order to provide more in-depth information on this treatment. Herein, we report the rationale, design and first baseline data of these combined international registries on renal denervation.

Methods

OBJECTIVE

The Global SYMPLICITY registry aims to document the long-term safety and effectiveness of renal denervation in a real-world population of patients with hypertension and other diseases characterised by elevated sympathetic drive. Due to the early start and distribution of the procedure with the commercially available Symplicity™ renal denervation system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) in Germany, the GREAT registry was initiated first with more focus on the needs within Germany, including detailed description of hypertension medications. Data from the GREAT registry are now incorporated into the Global SYMPLICITY registry. The primary objective of the registry is to assess the acute procedural and long-term safety and effectiveness of renal denervation in real-world patients with hypertension. In addition, the registry is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of renal denervation with regard to individual disease states characterised by elevated sympathetic drive (e.g., diabetes mellitus, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, cardiac arrhythmias and sleep apnoea). The registry will establish procedural benchmarking and practice patterns (e.g., evaluation of renal anatomy in clinical practice, procedural data such as number of ablations per artery, procedure and hospitalisation time and periprocedural safety events), assess the effect of geographical variation in subjects and procedural characteristics on clinical outcomes, and collect quality of life data related to the renal denervation procedure and to the disease state of subjects. Publication of the Global SYMPLICITY registry outcome will include the patients enrolled in the GREAT registry. After primary publication of the results, investigators may be allowed to publish regional data on request and with the approval of the GSR publication committee.

The Global SYMPLICITY and GREAT registries are sponsored and funded by Medtronic, Inc. Medtronic personnel are responsible for site activation, required reporting functions, and monitoring.

DESIGN

The Global SYMPLICITY registry is a prospective, open-label, multicentre single-arm registry. The registry will collect data from a minimum of 5,000 patients who receive renal denervation (among whom at least 1,000 subjects will be from the GREAT registry). Treatment decisions are left to the discretion of the physician and will be performed according to best available hospital practice and in accordance with the product instructions for use. Consecutively treated subjects at participating hospitals who are undergoing renal denervation with the Symplicity™ renal denervation system are considered for enrolment in the registry. Registry enrolment is ongoing.

The registry recommends follow-up for subjects at 3, 6 and 12 months (±30 days) and then annually through at least three years, but ideally up to five years (±60 days). The Global SYMPLICITY registry will be conducted for a minimum of three years from enrolment to the final subject and has the possibility to increase follow-up to five years or until the registry has been formally terminated. The GREAT registry will follow patients for five years.

ETHICS AND PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY

Confidentiality of all patients is protected. The protocol (including any possible amendments), informed consent forms, patient information sheets and safety reporting procedures were approved by each participating country, region or university authority as well as by the appropriate independent ethics committee or review board.

INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

The registries aim to include a patient population that reflects current clinical practice in participating countries. Included patients must be age >18 years or as required by local regulations and be suitable candidates for renal denervation as determined by the enrolling physician. Signed informed consent regarding the nature of the registry and authorisation of data collection by the patient or legal representative, as defined by local regulations, is required for all patients enrolled in the registries in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

All consecutive patients evaluated by an investigator and determined to be eligible candidates for the renal denervation procedure should be informed about the Global or GREAT SYMPLICITY registry and enrolled if inclusion criteria are met.

RENAL DENERVATION TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENTS

The renal denervation procedure will be performed according to the standards in the respective hospital and the instructions for use of the Symplicity™ renal denervation system. Prior to the renal denervation procedure and at each follow-up visit, registry investigators should reconfirm medication usage and document any medication changes. Rarely, treatment failure can occur when no energy is delivered in the intended location by the Symplicity renal denervation system despite multiple attempts. Treatment failures are recorded in the electronic case report form and these patients are followed up for three months for safety purposes, after which they exit the registry.

Suggested follow-up of each patient is at 3, 6 and 12 months post procedure and then annually for a minimum of three years and up to five years. Registry exit forms should be completed in the following cases: withdrawal of consent by patient or investigator, treatment failure, patient death, loss of follow-up.

All tests and procedures fall inside the standard of care for a given hospital and are not specified by the registry. The items listed in Table 1 represent a suggested sample of the standard of care data that will be collected in the electronic data capture system. At each office visit three office blood pressure measurements will be taken one minute apart using an automatic blood pressure monitor. When ambulatory blood pressure measurements are performed, compliance with published guidelines6 is suggested (every 15 to 30 minutes during the day and every 30 to 60 minutes at night).

Similarly to the Symplicity HTN trial programme, renal imaging is recommended for patients enrolled into the registry. The registry will investigate the techniques used to detect renal artery abnormalities with angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, computerised tomography or duplex scan. Electrocardiography, left ventricular imaging and blood testing may be performed as clinically indicated. Advanced testing for metabolic disorders by the glucose tolerance test and urine testing to screen for microalbuminuria or undetected kidney disease will also be performed as clinically indicated for selected patients. Table 1 includes a detailed list of diagnostic procedures that may be done at the discretion of the investigators and will also be captured.

QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE

The EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a standard instrument for use as a measure for health outcome and includes a visual analogue scale and a descriptive system39. The EQ-5D questionnaire will be provided in the local language and will be collected pre- and post-procedure, and at every follow-up.

DATA HANDLING AND STATISTIC EVALUATION

All data will be entered into an electronic data capture form using the Oracle™ Clinical Database Management System (Oracle, Redwood Shores, CA, USA). An independent contract research organisation (Institut für Herzinfarktforschung [IHF] Ludwigshafen, Germany) is responsible for data analysis. The enrolment period for the registry is approximately four years and recommended follow-up is for a minimum of three years and up to five years. All analyses will be performed based on all patients who passed the point of enrolment according to the intention-to-treat principle, provided consent/data release was obtained from the patient. Since the registries do not have a statistically powered hypothesis, there are no sample size calculations. The minimum number of enrolled patients is predefined and descriptive statistics for the clinical data will be provided. Categorical variables will be reported using counts and percentages. Continuous variables will be reported by giving the number of known values, the mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values. All patients with available data will be included in the analyses. The registry will be conducted in such a way as to minimise the incidence of missing data. Analyses will be carried out for subgroups to assess consistency of results between subgroups. Imputation of missing data will not be performed.

SITE SELECTION, TRAINING AND MONITORING

Site selection will be performed based upon screening against a list of selection criteria, including qualification by training and expertise to conduct the procedure and the registry, investigator and staff experience in performing studies and registries, complying with protocol and regulatory requirements, adequate volume of patients meeting eligibility criteria, and experience of centres and physicians with an adequate laboratory set up for procedure and pre- and post-procedural management and monitoring. Investigators will be trained with respect to the protocol, timeframes, eligibility, consenting data collection and safety event reporting as well as source document requirements and regulatory requirements and compliance. In order to ensure high quality data collection, monitoring visits will be performed at least once in every centre. The aim is to monitor 10% of source data collected in the registries.

SAFETY MONITORING AND ADJUDICATION OF EVENTS

An independent clinical events committee (CEC) will adjudicate all protocol-defined safety events potentially related to renal denervation. These events include vascular complications such as haematomas, arterial bleeding, pseudoaneurysm or bleeding, renal artery perforation or dissection, renal artery reintervention post index procedure, new renal artery stenosis >70% within six months post procedure, contrast nephropathy (acute GFR drop of >25%) or new renal failure, new need for dialysis and new-onset end-stage renal disease. Additionally, hypertensive crisis unrelated to confirmed medication non-adherence requiring hospitalisation, any significant embolic event resulting in end-organ damage, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation or new-onset heart failure requiring hospitalisation more than 24 hours, and all-cause and cardiovascular death will be adjudicated by the CEC.

PRELIMINARY BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS

Over the period from February 2012 to January 2013 a total of 70 sites in 20 countries all over the world recruited 772 patients undergoing renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension. Preliminary baseline characteristics are shown in Table 2. The Global and GREAT SYMPLICITY registries enrolled 63% and 61% male patients with an average age of 59.2 and 61.5 years, respectively. Patients in the GREAT SYMPLICITY were slightly older than those enrolled in the rest of the world.

BLOOD PRESSURE

Baseline office-based systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the overall registry population was 164.3±23.5 mmHg. There were some differences according to the distribution between blood pressure groups from <140 mmHg SBP to >180 mmHg SBP (Table 3). The majority of patients had blood pressure values between 140 and 179 mmHg. Blood pressure values were slightly lower in the GREAT registry with 18.2% of patients presenting with SBP values <140 mmHg and 50.2% with values >160 mmHg at baseline. Among the patients in the Global SYMPLICITY registry (GSR) excluding the GREAT, 69.0% were ≥160 mmHg at baseline. Baseline ambulatory blood pressures are shown in Table 3.

COMORBIDITIES AND DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES

After careful evaluation by the investigators, patients were screened for comorbidities. Overall in this hypertensive population 16% of patients have sleep apnoea, 41.0% have diabetes mellitus, 29% have chronic kidney disease, 12% have atrial fibrillation and 9% have evidence of heart failure (Table 2). The distribution of comorbidities according to baseline SBP is given in Table 4. Preliminary data suggest no clear association between number or type of comorbidity and baseline blood pressure.

Renal imaging before the denervation procedure was predominantly done by renal angiogram (66.4% overall, 54.5% GREAT, 78.4% other sites). Duplex ultrasound was also commonly used in the GREAT population (32.9%) but rarely by the GSR sites excluding GREAT (1.2%). MRI and CT were occasionally used by all sites (MRI 7.1%; CT 9.5% overall).

DRUG THERAPY

Table 5A summarises prescribed drug treatment. All patients were on high levels of concomitant treatments for hypertension (mean 4.3±1.3 drugs). However, the patients enrolled in GREAT were receiving a higher mean number of antihypertensive medications than patients from other sites. Concerning the distribution of different drug classes, there appears to be a greater usage of direct renin inhibitors, centrally-acting sympatholytics, direct-acting vasodilators and alpha-adrenergic blockers for patients enrolled in Germany versus other global sites outside Germany. The intensity of treatment does not appear to be related to the height of baseline blood pressure (Table 5B). Patients with concomitant comorbidities had higher numbers of medications at presentation, particularly patients with chronic kidney disease or sleep apnoea (Table 5C).

Discussion

Resistant hypertension is associated with a particularly high rate of complications11, and therefore requires intensive treatment5-7,10. Medical treatment usually consists of three or more drugs at maximally tolerated doses, one being a diuretic5,6. Many patients do not tolerate these drugs or do not achieve guideline recommended targets for blood pressure values despite intensive drug treatment. Recently, a new catheter-based technique of renal artery denervation22 has gained a lot of interest not only in the scientific community but also in the public domain, in particular amongst the affected patients40,41. In fact, an expert panel from the European Society of Cardiology has recently published an overview of catheter-based renal denervation that provides guidance for the appropriate use of this novel therapy and highlights future potential applications for renal denervation42. The Symplicity HTN clinical development programme started with a proof-of-concept study in which a blood pressure reduction was proven by applying this procedure in treatment-resistant patients23,24.

The sustained reductions of blood pressure, even in patients already receiving intensive medical treatment (in the trials more than five drug classes on average), have led many physicians to use the renal denervation technique in countries where the device is available. Although the number of patients in randomised trials is very limited there has been widespread use of the technique40. The low number of patients included in the trials precludes evaluation of safety in a large population treated under real-world conditions41. Furthermore, inclusion criteria in the studies were narrowed such that the applicability of the data to a broader population cannot be answered by the current SYMPLICITY clinical trials. The broader application, as shown herein, namely the treatment of patients with blood pressure levels lower than in those patients enrolled in the clinical trials, means that patients are included in the registry for whom no evidence of effectiveness is presently available. This will provide valuable data to guide real-world selection of hypertensive patients. Additionally, limited evidence is available concerning the renal denervation technique when comorbidities are prevalent, e.g., diabetes mellitus or chronic renal disease, where only circumstantial evidence for effectiveness is available. In order to understand further and to develop this treatment appropriately, these combined registries include broad patient populations that will provide information on real-life practice for a wide variety of comorbid conditions associated with activation of the sympathetic nervous system.

The Global SYMPLICITY registry aims to investigate 5,000 patients with a follow-up of at least three years and up to five years. After complete follow-up in the large patient population, the generated databases will allow investigators to answer questions as to whether the technique of renal denervation is applicable in a broad population or whether it is influenced by the site where treatment is performed, by limitations of safety or by the influence of comorbidities on treatment success. These registries aim to develop future research questions for renal denervation and improve the way to treat hypertension and in particular resistant hypertension, which is still unresolved with regard to the optimal method to improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

The adverse event rate is quite low in patients in clinical trials. However, trial centres are selected and staff/clinicians have been extensively trained by proctors who introduced the techniques. It is important to establish the safety of renal denervation across broad patient populations treated in real-world settings and with less experience than those traditionally engaged in formal clinical trials. Therefore, the Global SYMPLICITY registry is specifically designed to evaluate the effect of treatment with the Symplicity renal denervation system in hypertensive patients with a wider range of baseline blood pressures and different levels of coexisting comorbidities. According to the first baseline data presented herein, it is apparent that a large number of patients were treated with lower blood pressure values than those randomised into formal clinical trials. Furthermore, there are centres involved in the registries with different backgrounds and clinical specialities. Some treatments are undertaken by vascular radiologists, but most by interventional cardiologists. It will be interesting to determine whether different comorbidity treatment modalities or clinical disciplines involved in the treatment of these patients provide evidence of differential effectiveness and real-world safety. The Global SYMPLICITY registry also has the goal to develop the technique and evaluate the results in a broad population involving different countries with differences in socioeconomic status.

In conclusion, the Global SYMPLICITY registry, including the patients from the GREAT registry, will provide a large database on renal denervation under real-world conditions with a primary goal to evaluate the observed safety and effectiveness of the Symplicity renal denervation system in treating resistant hypertension. The information might be of particular value to develop hypotheses further and power estimates for future controlled clinical trials and to identify appropriate target populations for future studies of interventional renal artery denervation.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Marianne Wanten and Amy Steig for study management support and Colleen Gilbert for editorial support.

Funding

Medtronic, Inc.

Conflict of interest statement

M. Böhm is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and receives speaker honoraria from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical and Cordis and scientific support from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, Vessix, and Recor. F. Mahfoud is supported by Deutsche Hochdruckliga and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, and received speaker honoraria or scientific support for clinical studies from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, Vessix and Recor. L. Ruilope has been advisor/speaker for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Menarini, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier and Takeda. R. Schmieder has received advisory and speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier and Takeda. M. Negoita is an employee of Medtronic. All other authors receive research support from Medtronic.


References

Volume 9 Number 4
Aug 23, 2013
Volume 9 Number 4
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00010 Apr 15, 2024
Timing of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel disease – two sides of the same coin
Stähli B and Stehli J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01046 Apr 15, 2024
Feasibility and safety of transcaval venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe cardiogenic shock
Giustino G et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00836 Apr 15, 2024
Renal denervation in the management of hypertension
Lauder L et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al
Trending articles
338.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved