References
1YangN, XuXW, WangRR Contributions of Zea mays subspecies mexicana haplotypes to modern maize. Nat. Commun., 2017; 8: 1874.
2HubertB, RosegrantM, BoekelMA The future of food: scenarios for 2050. Crop. Sci., 2010; 50: 33–50.
3HakeS, Ross-IbarraJ. Genetic, evolutionary and plant breeding insights from the domestication of maize. Elife, 2015; 4: e05861.
4SchnablePS, WareD, FultonRS The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science, 2009; 326: 1112–1115.
5HirschCN, HirschCD, BrohammerAB Draft assembly of elite inbred line PH207 provides insights into genomic and transcriptome diversity in Maize. Plant Cell, 2016; 28: 2700–2714.
6JiaoY, PelusoP, ShiJ Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies. Nature, 2017; 546: 524–527.
7SunS, ZhouY, ChenJ Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations between Mo17 and other maize genomes. Nat. Genet., 2018; 50: 1289–1295.
8LiC, SongW, LuoY The HuangZaoSi Maize genome provides insights into genomic variation and improvement history of Maize. Mol. Plant., 2019; 12: 402–409.
9LuF, RomayMC, GlaubitzJC High-resolution genetic mapping of maize pan-genome sequence anchors. Nat. Commun., 2015; 6: 6914.
10HabererG, KamalN, BauerE European maize genomes highlight intraspecies variation in repeat and gene content. Nat. Genet., 2020; 52: 950–957.
11HuffordMB, SeetharamAS, WoodhouseMR De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes. Science, 2021; 373: 655–662.
12ZhangR, XuG, LiJ Patterns of genomic variation in Chinese maize inbred lines and implications for genetic improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2018; 131: 1207–1221.
13YangN, LiuJ, GaoQ Genome assembly of a tropical maize inbred line provides insights into structural variation and crop improvement. Nat. Genet., 2019; 51: 1052–1059.
14BeltonJM, McCordRP, GibcusJH Hi-C: a comprehensive technique to capture the conformation of genomes. Methods, 2012; 58: 268–276.
16ChengH, ConcepcionGT, FengX Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Meth., 2021; 18: 170–175.
19ChinCS, AlexanderDH, MarksP Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Meth., 2013; 10: 563–569.
20WalkerBJ, AbeelT, SheaT Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One, 2014; 9(11): e112963.
22WingettS, EwelsP, Furlan-MagarilM HiCUP: pipeline for mapping and processing Hi-C data. F1000Res, 2015; 4: 1310.
24ZhangX, ZhangS, ZhaoQ Assembly of allele-aware, chromosomal-scale autopolyploid genomes based on Hi-C data. Nat. Plants, 2019; 5: 833–845.
25DurandNC, RobinsonJT, ShamimMS Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst., 2016; 3: 99–101.
26LiH, DurbinR. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 2010; 26: 589–595.
27ParraG, BradnamK, KorfI. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics, 2007; 23: 1061–1067.
28GertzEM, YuYK, AgarwalaR Composition-based statistics and translated nucleotide searches: improving the TBLASTN module of BLAST. BMC Biol., 2006; 4: 41.
29BirneyE, ClampM, DurbinR. GeneWise and genomewise. Genome Res., 2004; 14: 988–995.
30AliotoT, BlancoE, ParraG Using geneid to identify genes. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform., 2018; 64: e56.
31SimãoFA, WaterhouseRM, IoannidisP BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics, 2015; 31: 3210–3212.
33EllinghausD, KurtzS, WillhoeftU. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinform., 2008; 9: 18.
34XuZ, WangH. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucl. Acids Res., 2007; 35: W265–W268.
35OuS, ChenJ, JiangN. Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR Assembly Index (LAI). Nucl. Acids Res., 2018; 46(21): e126.
37PriceAL, JonesNC, PevznerPA. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics, 2005; 21(Suppl 1): i351–i358.
39BensonG. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucl. Acids Res., 1999; 27: 573–580.
40StankeM, SteinkampR, WaackS AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucl. Acids Res., 2004; 32: W309–W312.
41StankeM, KellerO, GunduzI AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucl. Acids Res., 2006; 34: W435–W439.
42StankeM, MorgensternB. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints. Nucl. Acids Res., 2005; 33: W465–W467.
43BurgeC, KarlinS. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol., 1997; 268: 78–94.
44MajorosWH, PerteaM, SalzbergSL. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics, 2004; 20: 2878–2879.
45KorfI. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinform., 2004; 5: 59.
46KimD, PerteaG, TrapnellC TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol., 2013; 14: R36.
47TrapnellC, RobertsA, GoffL Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc., 2012; 7: 562–578.
48GrabherrMG, HaasBJ, YassourM Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol., 2011; 29: 644–652.
49KentWJ. BLAT–the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res., 2002; 12: 656–664.
50HaasBJ, DelcherAL, MountSM Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucl. Acids Res., 2003; 31: 5654–5666.
51HaasBJ, SalzbergSL, ZhuW Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol., 2008; 9: R7.
52LoweTM, EddySR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucl. Acids Res., 1997; 25: 955–964.
53NawrockiEP, KolbeDL, EddySR. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics, 2009; 25: 1335–137.
54NawrockiEP, EddySR. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics, 2013; 29: 2933–2935.
55LiL, StoeckertCJ, RoosDS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res., 2003; 13: 2178–2189.
56AltschulSF, GishW, MillerW Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 1990; 215: 403–410.
57KurtzS, PhillippyAM, DelcherAL Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol., 2004; 5(2): 1–9.
60GoelM, SunH, JiaoWB SyRI: finding genomic rearrangements and local sequence differences from whole-genome assemblies. Genome Biol., 2019; 20: 277.
62ZhaoY, WangY, MaD Supporting data for “A chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of a maize elite breeding line Dan340”. GigaScience Database. 2022; http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/102221.