oa How Document Sampling and Vocabulary Pruning Affect the Results of Topic Models

References

1. Bischof, J., & Airoldi, E. M.(2012). Summarizing topical content with word frequency and exclusivity. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, 201-208.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blei, D., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I.(2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, (3), 993-1022.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blei, D. M.(2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bonilla, T., & Grimmer, J.(2013). Elevated threat levels and decreased expectations: How democracy handles terrorist threats. Poetics, 41(6), 650-669. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2013.06.003
   [Google Scholar]
5. Denny, M. J., & Spirling, A.(2018). Text preprocessing for unsupervised learning: Why it matters, when it misleads, and what to do about it. Political Analysis, 26(2), 168-189. doi:10.1017/pan.2017.44
   [Google Scholar]
6. Grimmer, J.(2010). A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in Senate press releases. Political Analysis, 18(1), 1-35.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M.(2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political analysis, 21(3), 267-297.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Guo, L., Vargo, C. J., Pan, Z., Ding, W., & Ishwar, P.(2016). Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication: Comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modeling. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 332-359. doi:10.1177/1077699016639231
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hanks, P.(2012). The corpus revolution in lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography, 25(4), 398-436.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hong, L., & Davison, B. D.(2010). Empirical study of topic modeling in Twitter. Proceedings of the first ACM workshop on social media analytics, 80-88.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hopkins, D. J., & King, G.(2010). A method of automated nonparametric content analysis for social science. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 229-247.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Maier, D., Waldherr, A., Miltner, P., Wiedemann, G., Niekler, A., Keinert, A., ... Adam, S.(2018). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2-3), 93-118. doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754
    [Google Scholar]
13. Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H.(2003). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Niekler, A.(2018). Automatisierte Verfahren für die Themenanalyse nachrichtenorientierter Textquellen. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Niekler, A., & Jähnichen, P.(2012). Matching results of latent Dirichlet allocation for text. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 317-322.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. H., & Radev, D. R.(2010). How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 209-228.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sievert, C., & Shirley, K. E.(2014). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. Proceedings from the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces. Baltimore, MD.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Waldherr, A., Maier, D., Miltner, P., & Günther, E.(2017). Big data, big noise: The challenge of finding issue networks on the web. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 427-443.
    [Google Scholar]