JDSE

The Journal of Dental Sciences and Education deals with General Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Orthodontics, Oral diagnosis and DentomaxilloFacial Radiology, Endodontics, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Implantology, Dental Education and other dentistry fields and accepts articles on these topics. Journal of Dental Science and Education publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorial commentaries, letters to the editor, educational articles, and conference/meeting announcements. This journal is indexed by indices that are considered international scientific journal indices (DRJI, ESJI, OAJI, etc.). According to the current Associate Professorship criteria, it is within the scope of International Article 1-d. Each article published in this journal corresponds to 5 points.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Effect of mouthwash on color change and solubility of composite resins
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of currently available mouthwashes on color changes and solubilities of composite resins by comparing them.
Methods: Three different types of composite resins, namely nanofill, nanohybrid, and microhybrid resins (Filtek Ultimate, Estelite Sigma Quick, and Filtek Z250, respectively), were used in thisstudy. A total of 120 samples, with 40 foreach composite material, were prepared. The composite resins were placed in plastic molds of 10 mm × 2 mm with round disc shapes and polymerized with an LED light device. After finishing and polishing them with a polishing disc, the prepared samples were stored in distilled water. Initial color measurements were performed using the VITA Easyshade V device (VITA, Germany) for color stability evaluations. For solubility measurements, the dry weights of the samples were measured and their diameters and thicknesses were recorded with a caliper. Samples from each group were then immersed in three different mouthwashes (Kloroben, Listerine Advanced White, and Colgate Plax) twice a day for 2 minutes for 14 days. After 14 days, color and weight measurements were repeated for all samples. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used in the statistical analysis of the data.
Results: Significant color changes were detected in all samples as a result of color measurements (p<0.05). Significant differences were observed for all solution groups in terms of color change, but the lowest amount of color change was observed with the Colgate Plax solution. Comparisons of composite groups revealed that Filtek Ultimate was the composite with the lowest amount of color change. Positive solubility values were recorded for all samples as a result of solubility measurements. Although no significant difference was observed among composite groups in terms of solubility, higher solubility levels were detected with the Kloroben, Listerine Advanced White, and Colgate Plax solutionscompared to the control group.
Conclusion: In thisstudy, in all evaluated composite groups, acceptable levels of color change and solubility were detected, with values varying depending on the composite material after immersion in the mouthwashes.


1. Al-Negrish ARS. Composite resin restorations: a cross-sectional surveyof placement and replacement in Jordan. Int Dent J. 2002;52(6):461-468.
2. Ozer S, Sen Tunc E, Tuloglu N, Bayrak S. Solubility of two resincomposites in different mouthrinses. BioMed Res Int. 2014:580675.
3. Dos Santos PA, Garcia PPNS, De Oliveira ALBM, Chinelatti MA,Palma-Dibb RG. Chemical and morphological features of dentalcomposite resin: influence of light curing units and immersion media.Microscopy Res Technique. 2010;73(3):176-181.
4. Bozkurt F&Ouml;, Akalın TT, Gen&ccedil; G, Ceyhan YK. The effect of mouthrinseson color stability of sonicfill and a nanohybrid composite. J IstanbulUniv Fac Dent. 2016;50(2):17-23.
5. M&uuml;ller HD, Eick S, Moritz A, Lussi A, Gruber R. Cytotoxicityand antimicrobial activity of oral rinses in vitro. BioMed Res Int.2017:4019723.
6. Ardu S, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Feilzer AJ, Di Bella E, Dietschi D.(Influence of water sorption on resin composite color and colorvariation amongst various composite brands with identical shade code:an in vitro evaluation. J Dent. 2011;39:e37-e44.
7. Moharamzadeh K, Van Noort R, Brook IM, Scutt AM. HPLC analysisof components released from dental composites with different resincompositions using different extraction media. J Materials Sci:Materials in Med. 2007;18 (1):133-137.
8. Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Burke FJT, Marquis PM, Randall RC. Theinfluence of short and medium-term water immersion on the hydrolyticstability of novel low-shrink dental composites. Dental Materials.2005;21(9):852-863.
9. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Rate of elution of leachable components fromcomposite. Dental Materials. 1990;6(4):282-287.
10. Price RB, Fahey J, Felix CM. Knoopmicrohardness mapping used tocompare the efficacy of LED, QTH and PAC curing lights. OperativeDentistry. 2010;35(1):58-68.
11. Gen&ccedil; G, Toz T. Rezin kompozitlerin renk stabilitesi ile ilgili bir derleme:Kompozit renklenmelerinin etyolojisi, sınıflandırılması ve tedavisi.Ege&Uuml;niv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2017;38(2):68-79.
12. Paravina RD, Kimura M, Powers JM. Evaluation of polymerization-dependent changes in color and translucency of resin composites usingtwo formulae. Odontology. 2005; 93(1):46-51.
13. Bohner LOL, de Godoi APT, Ahmed AS, Neto PT, Catirse ABCEB.Surface roughness of restorative materials after immersion inmouthwashes. Eur J Gen Dent. 2016;5(03):111-114.
14. Carpenter GH, Pramanik R, Proctor GB. An in vitro model ofchlorhexidine-induced tooth staining. J Periodont Res. 2005;40(3):225-230.
15. Ertas E, Gueler AU, Yuecel AC, K&ouml;pr&uuml;l&uuml; H, G&uuml;ler E. Color stability ofresin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Materials J.2006;25(2):371-376.
16. Boaro LC, Gon&ccedil;alves F, Guimar&atilde;es TC, Ferracane JL, Pfeifer CS,Braga RR. Sorption, solubility, shrinkage and mechanical propertiesof &ldquo;low-shrinkage&rdquo; commercial resin composites. Dent Materials.2013;9(4):398-404.
17. S&ouml;derholm KJ. Degradation of glass filler in experimental composites. JDent Res. 1981;60(11):1867-1875.
18. Da Silva EM, Gon&ccedil;alves L, Guimar&atilde;es JGA, Poskus LT, Fellows CE.The diffusion kinetics of a nanofilled and a midifilled resin compositeimmersed in distilled water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Clin OralInvest. 2011;15(3):393-401.
19. Khokhar ZA, Razzoog ME, Yaman P. Color stability of restorativeresins. Quintessence Int. 1991;22(9):733-737.
20. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymernetworks. Dent Materials. 2006;22(3):211-222.
21. &Ouml;rtengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U, Terselius B, Karlsson S. Influence ofpH and storage time on the sorption and solubility behaviour of threecomposite resin materials. J Dent. 2001;29(1):35-41.
22. Abu-Bakr NH, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Effect of alcoholic andlow-ph soft drinks on fluoride release from compomer. J EstheticRestorative Dent. 2000;12(2):97-104.
23. Lee SY, Huang HM, Lin CY, Shih YH. Leached components fromdental composites in oral simulating fluids and the resultant compositestrengths. J Oral Rehab. 1998;25(8):575-588.
24. Sarrett DC, Ray S. The effect of water on polymer matrix and compositewear. Dent Materials. 1994;10(1):6-10.
25. Pereira SG, Osorio R, Toledano M, Cabrerizo-V&iacute;lchez MA, Nunes TG,Kalachandra S. Novel light-cured resins and composites with improvedphysicochemical properties. Dent Materials. 2007;23:1189-1198.
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2023
Page : 6-12
_Footer