JORR

The Journal of Orthopedics Research and Rehabilitation welcomes scholarly papers inorthopaedic surgery, physical therapy and rehabilitation, neurosurgery, neurology and clinic anesthesiology and reanimation. This journal is indexed by indices that are considered international scientific journal indices (DRJI, ESJI, OAJI, etc.). According to the current Associate Professorship criteria, it is within the scope of International Article 1-d. Each article published in this journal corresponds to 5 points.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Mid-Term results in adult humeral fractures with titanium elastic nail fixation versus plate and screw fixation and locking intramedullary nailing
Aims: To compare plate-screw fixation, intramedullary nailing (IMN), and titanium elastic nailing (TEN) as a new fixation method with respect to nonunion, complication rates, and functional outcomes in the repair of adult humeral shaft fractures.
Methods: A total of 38 adult patients who were treated due to humeral shaft fracture at our clinic and were followed for minimum six months between January 2012 and January 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Age, sex, fracture etiology an length of hospitalization were recorded. Fractures were classified according to the Association for Osteosynthesis(AO) classification. Nonunion rates as assessed by X-ray during visits, angulation, shoulder, elbow and hand disability scores were evaluated using the DASH, Mayo Elbow and UCLA Shoulder scoring, and Stewart Hundley criteria.
Results: There was no significant epidemiological difference between the groups. The length of hospitalization was lower in the TEN group. There was no significant difference in nonunion rates and functional scores according to the type of treatment. Angulation rate was slightly higher in the TEN group. The effect of angulation on functional score showed no influence on the functional status. The three treatment types mostly achieved excellent and good outcomes.
Conclusion: Our study results suggest that TEN seems to be a good alternative treatment in eligible patients with humeral shaft fractures considering complications of other treatments. However, we believe that further, large-scale, randomized-controlled, prospective studies with longer follow-up duration are required to confirm these findings and to establish a definite conclusion. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III.


1. Baltov A, Mihail R, Dian E. Complications after interlockingintramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Injury. 2014;45 Suppl1:S9-S15. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.044
2. Gregory PR. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. In: Rockwoodand Green’sfractures in adults 5th Ed. Vol.1. Lippincott, Williams &Wilkins, Philadelphia 2001:974-994.
3. Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Compression plating versus hackethal nailingin closed humeral shaft fractures failing nonoperative reduction. JOrthop Trauma. 1995;9(3):194-197. doi:10.1097/00005131-199506000-00003
4. Livani B, Belangero WD. Bridging plate osteosynthesis ofhumeral shaft fractures. Injury. 2004;35(6):587-595. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2003.12.003
5. Tytherleigh-Strong G, Walls N, McQueen MM. The epidemiologyof humeral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(2):249-253.doi:10.1302/0301-620x.80b2.8113
6. Kesemenli CC, Subaşı M, Arslan H, Necmioğlu S, Kapukaya A.Humerus kırıklı olgularda kilitli intramedülle çivi ve plak iletedavi sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. Acta Orthop Traum Turc.2003;37(2):120-5.
7. Kessler SB, Nast-Kolb D, Brunner U, Wischhöfer E. Marknagelungdes Oberarms als Alternative zur Konservativen Therapie und zurPlattenosteosynthese [Intramedullary nailing of the humerus asan alternative to conservative therapy and to plate osteosynthesis][published correction appears in Orthopade 1996 Aug;25(4):362].Orthopade. 1996;25(3):216-222.
8. Brug E, Westphal T, Schäfers G. Differenzierte Behandlung derHumerusdiaphysenfrakturen [Differential treatment of diaphysealhumerus fractures]. Unfallchirurg. 1994;97(12):633-638.
9. Foster RJ, Dixon GL Jr, Bach AW, Appleyard RW, Green TM. Internalfixation of fractures and non-unions of the humeral shaft. Indicationsand results in a multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(6):857-864.
10. Osman N, Touam N, Masmajean E, Asfazadourian H et al. Resultsof nonoperative and operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures.Annals Of Hand And Upper Limb Surgery 1998;17(3):195-206.
11. Karaismailoğlu TN, Gülman B, Şen S, Çıray M. Erişkin humerus cisimkırıklarında tedavi. OMU Tıp Dergisi 1992;9:131-136.
12. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S.Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(11):1469-1473. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17634
13. Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ. Randomized prospectivestudy of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versusplates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(3):162-166. doi:10.1097/00005131-200003000-00002
14. Verdano MA, Pellegrini A, Schiavi P, Somenzi L, Concari G, CeccarelliF. Humeral shaft fractures treated with antegrade intramedullarynailing: what are the consequences for the rotator cuff?. Int Orthop.2013;37(10):2001-2007. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2007-1
15. Meekers FS, Broos PL. Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures.The Leuven experience. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002;68(5):462-470.
16. McCormack RG, Brien D, Buckley RE, McKee MD, Powell J, SchemitschEH. Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamiccompression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomisedtrial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):336-339. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.82b3.9675
17. Khurana A, Pendse A, Modi H, Diwanji S, Mathur H, Daveshwar R.Retrograde Ender nailing for humerus shaft fractures. Acta OrthopBelg. 2009;75(5):599-605.
18. Wali MG, Baba AN, Latoo IA, Bhat NA, Baba OK, Sharma S. Internalfixation of shaft humerus fractures by dynamic compression plate orinterlocking intramedullary nail: a prospective, randomised study.Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014;9(3):133-140. doi:10.1007/s11751-014-0204-0
19. Williams PR, Shewring D. Use of an elastic intramedullary nail indifficult humeral fractures. Injury. 1998;29(9):661-670. doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00158-2
20. Siegel DB, Gelberman RH. Peripheral nevre injuries associated withfractures and dislocations. In: Gelberman GH (ed). Operative NerveRepair and reconstraction. JB Lippincott, Philedelphia 1991:619-25.
21. Bektaş U, Ay Ş, Demirtaş M. Radial sinir lezyonunun eşlik ettiğihumerus cisim kırıklarında cerrahi tedavinin yeri. In: Ege R (ed).14.Milli Türk Ortopedive Travmatoloji Kongre Kitabı, Ankara 1996:217-219.
22. Ekholm R. Humeral shaft fractures, epidemiology and outcome.Larserics Digital Print AD, Stockholm 2007.
23. Wright TW, Miller GJ, Vander Griend RA, Wheeler D, Dell PC.Reconstruction of the humerus with an intramedullary fibular graft. Aclinical and biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(5):804-807. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376445
24. Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. Fractures of the Shaft of the Humerus.Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 4th Edition Philedelphia.Lippincott. 1996;Vol.1:1025
25. Shao YC, Harwood P, Grotz MR, Limb D, Giannoudis PV. Radial nervepalsy associated with fractures of the shaft of the humerus: a systematicreview. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(12):1647-1652. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B12.16132
26. Zagorski JB, Latta LL, Zych GA, Finnieston AR. Diaphyseal fracturesof the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces. J Bone Joint SurgAm. 1988;70(4):607-610.
27. Türken MA. Medial kelebek fragmanlı humerus cisim kırıklarındafarklı internal tespit yöntemlerinin biyomekanik değerlendirilmesi.Uzmanlıktezi, İzmir 2007.
28. Klenerman L. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint SurgBr. 1966;48(1):105-111.
29. Habernek H, Schmid L, Orthner E. Erste Erfahrungen mit demOberarmverriegelungsnagel [Initial experiences with the humerusinterlocking nail]. Unfallchirurgie. 1992;18(4):233-237. doi:10.1007/BF02588186
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2023
Page : 11-15
_Footer