DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Hysteresis Characteristics and Analysis Model of Hybrid Damping Device - Hybrid Damping Device Consisting of Steel Slit and Rotational Friction Damping Device -

하이브리드 감쇠장치의 이력특성 및 해석모델에 관한 연구 - 강재슬릿과 회전마찰 감쇠장치를 결합한 복합 감쇠장치 -

  • Received : 2021.03.04
  • Accepted : 2021.07.27
  • Published : 2021.11.30

Abstract

The present study proposed a hybrid damping system that can minimize structural damage caused by an earthquake. In hybrid damping system, a rotational friction damping device and a steel hysteresis damping device are connected in parallel. The rotational friction damping device with high stiffness operates at low displacement; and then, it behaves in a composite movement at high displacement to dissipate the energy generated by an earthquake. To propose the hysteresis characteristic and numerical analysis model of the composite damping device, a total of 15 specimens were prepared and were made to undergo cyclic loading according to the damping device test methods of KDS 41 17 00 and MOE 2019. From the results of the experiment, the maximum and minimum loads at the origin, as well as in each direction, and the hysteresis curve area were determined to be within the maximum ±6% of the average value, satisfying the suitability criteria of Korea damping devices. The four numerical analysis models, which were proposed for the vibration suppression and seismic reinforcement effect evaluation, adequately simulated the experimental results; however, the tri-linear model exhibited a tendency to underestimate the energy absorption capacity at 60mm the experimental displacement.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2020년도 한국연구재단 연구비 지원에 의한 결과의 일부임. 과제번호:2020R1C1C1005779

References

  1. Ana M., Tudor S., Marius G., & Ovidiu S. (2014). A comparative study of the dynamic behavior of Ramberg-Osgood and Bouc-Wen hysteresis models with application to seismic protection devices, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Engineering Structures, 76, PP.255~269 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.002
  2. Architectural Institute of Korea, Seismic building design code and commentary (KDS 41 17 00), 2019
  3. A. Toyooka, T. Himeno, Y. Hishijima, H. Iemura, & I. Mualla. (2008). Verification Tests of the Dynamic Behavior of the Novel Friction-Based Rotational Damper using Shaking Table, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
  4. C. Xia, & R.D. Hanson. (1992). Influence of ADAS Element Parameters on Building Seismic Response, Journal of Structural Engineering. 118(7), 1903~1918. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:7(1903)
  5. Hwang, J.S., Park, S.C., & Kang, K.J. (2013). A Study on the Hysteresis Properties and Mathematical Model of Kagome Truss Damper, 29(9), PP.21~29 https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2013.29.9.21
  6. Lee, J.H., Kang, H.G., & Kim, J.K. (2017). Seismic performance of steel plate slit-friction hybrid dampers, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 136, PP.128~139 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.005
  7. Ministry of Education, Seismic Performance Evaluation and Reinforcement Manual for School Facilities, PP.1~329., 2019
  8. Park, B.T., Kang, J.W., Kim, Y.S., & Lee, J.H. (2020). Analysis of Reinforcing Effect through Frame Test of Hybrid Damper Combining Steel Slit and Rotational Friction Damper. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 22(6), PP.91~98
  9. Seismosoft, SeismoStruct v2020, Seismostruct User Manual and Verification Report
  10. Shin, S.H., & Oh, S.H. (2016). Hysteresis Characteristics of Buckling Restrained Brace with Steel Double-Restraining Elements of Built-up Type, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 32(1), PP. 23~34
  11. Song, J., & Armen D. (2006). Bouc-Wen Model for Highly Asymmetric Hysteresis, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 132, PP.610~618 https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2006)132:6(610)