Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of reaction force and contact pressure on design truck load of slab bridge supported by MSEW abutment

보강토교대로 지지된 슬래브교의 설계 활하중에 대한 반력 및 접지압 검토

  • Kim, Hong-Bae (Department of Civil Engineering, Kumoh Institute of Technology) ;
  • Han, Heui-Soo (Department of Civil Engineering, Kumoh Institute of Technology)
  • 김홍배 (금오공과대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 한희수 (금오공과대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2019.02.08
  • Accepted : 2019.05.03
  • Published : 2019.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the structural analysis was conducted to the comparison of reaction force and contact pressure on the design truck load (DB-24 and KL-510) of slab bridge supported by MSEW abutment. As a result of the structural analysis, the reaction force acting on the abutment at the continuous bridge was reduced rather than the simple span bridge. The reaction force due to the dead load was estimated to be about twice as large as that of the live load, and the influence of the live load on the total reaction force was relatively small. The contact pressure of the MSEW abutment was estimated to be the largest in the simple span bridge. The influence of contact pressure on the type of live load was relatively small. Therefore, it is considered to be more advantageous to apply the MSEW abutment to the continuous bridge than to the simple span bridge because the contact pressure acting on the abutment on the continuous bridge is estimated to be small. Since the reaction force and the load sharing ratio acting on the MSEW abutment depending on various conditions, it is necessary to examine the contact pressure in various types of bridges and specifications.

본 연구에서는 보강토교대로 지지된 슬래브교의 설계 활하중을 도로교설계기준(2010)의 DB-24와 도로교설계기준(한계상태설계법)(2015)의 KL-510으로 구조해석을 수행하였다. 구조해석 결과로부터 산정된 슬래브교의 반력과 보강토교대에 작용하는 접지압에 대해 비교검토를 수행하였다. 교대에 작용되는 반력은 교각의 유무와 개수에 따라 다르게 산정되었다. 단경간에 비해 연속교에서 교대에 작용되는 반력이 감소되는 것으로 나타났다. 구조해석 결과, 활하중보다는 고정하중에 의한 반력이 약 2배 이상 크게 산정되었으며, 활하중이 전체 반력에 미치는 영향이 상대적으로 작았다. 보강토교대에 작용하는 접지압은 단경간에서 가장 크게 산정되었다. 이동하중의 종류에 따른 영향은 상대적으로 크지 않았다. 따라서, 연속교에서 교대에 작용되는 반력과 접지압이 작게 산정되기 때문에, 단경간 교량보다는 연속 교량에 보강토교대를 적용하는 것이 유리한 것으로 판단되었다. 보강토교대에 작용되는 반력과 하중 분담률은 다양한 조건에 따라 달라지므로, 다양한 교량 형식과 제원에서의 접지압 검토가 향후 필요하다.

Keywords

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Standard figure of true MSEW abutment [6]; (a) Cross-section view of abutment (b) Arrangement of abutment

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Line location of maximum tension on MSEW abutment depending on seat geometry [9]; (a) Case 1, (b) Case 2, (c) Case 3

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Variation of stress ratio with depth in aMSE wall [6];

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Cross-section view of true MSEW [1];

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Standard cross-section view of highway road in Korea Highway Corporation (four lanes) [1];

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Cross section of slab bridge; (a) Drawing of cross section (b) Drawing of longitudinal section

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Design truck load; (a) Korean Highway Bridge Design Code [8] (b) Korean Highway Bridge Design Code (Limit State Design) [9]

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Structural analysis model; (a) Simple span of length 13.5m (b) Two spans of length 27.0m (c) Three spans of length 40.5m

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Comparison of reaction force on the bridge according to bridge length; (a) Dead load, (b) Live load

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0010.png 이미지

Fig. 10. Load bearing ratio of abutment according to bridge length; (a) Korean Highway Bridge Design Code [8], (b) Korean Highway Bridge Design Code(Limit State Design)[9]

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0011.png 이미지

Fig. 11. Reaction force of live load and dead load onthe abutment according to bridge length

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_f0012.png 이미지

Fig. 12. Contact pressure of abutment according tobridge length

Table 1. Reaction force of bridge bearing with simple span by structural analysis

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Reaction force of bridge bearing with 2nd span by structural analysis

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Reaction force of bridge bearing with 3rd span by structural analysis

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Reaction force of the live load according tothe length of the bridge

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n5_510_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. M. C. Park, "A Study on Applicability and External / Internal Stability of true MSEW abutment with Slab", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 263-274, 2018. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.5.54
  2. KECRI, "Evaluation and Improvement of Ride Discomfort at Bridge Approaches in Service". Korea Expressway Corporation Research Institute, 2012.
  3. KECRI, "Developement of A New Concept Abutment", EXTRI-2016-47-534.9607, Korea Expressway Corporation Research Institute, 2016.
  4. K. Brabant, "Mechanically Stabilized Earth walls for support of highway bridges." Advanced Foundation Engineering UMASS Lowell-Course(14.533), 2001.
  5. M. S. Nam, S. K. Kang, K. J. Jung, "Development of MSEW Abutment Bridge, Korea Expressway Corperation Research Institute: Korea, 2018.
  6. FHWA, "Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes, Design and Construction Guidelines", FHWA-NHI-00-043, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transfortation, Washington, DC, 2001.
  7. KEC (2018). "Integral MSEW Abutment Bridge design Guidelines", Korea Expressway Corperation.
  8. MLTMA, "Korean Highway Bridge Design Code", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2010.
  9. MLTMA, "Korean Highway Bridge Design Code(Limit State Design)", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2015.
  10. Korean Geotechnical Society, "Structure foundation design standards specification", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2008.
  11. FHWA, "Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes", FHWA-NHI-10-024, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transfortation, Washington, DC, 2009.
  12. Korean Geotechnical Society, "Structure foundation design standards specification", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2015.
  13. E. S. Hwang, "Introduction to Loads in the Limit-State based Bridge Design Specification", Magazine of the Korean Society of Steel Construction, Vol.25, No.1, 2013.
  14. C. S. Yoo, H. Y. Jeon, "Long-Term Behavior of Geogrid Reinforced Soil Abutment - A Numerical Investigation", Journal of the Korean geotechnical society, Vol.27, No.1, pp.65-76, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2011.27.1.065
  15. A. Abdelouhab, D. Dias, N. Freitag, "Numerical analysis of the behaviour of mechanically stabilized earth walls reinforced with different types of strips." Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.116-129, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.011