Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Whistleblowing in French Corporations: Anatomy of a National Taboo

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Denunciations, disclosures and reporting: why do whistleblowing procedures create an ethical dilemma in French corporations? Since July 2006, the requirement that foreign multinationals listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) implement this practice has been met with stiff resistance in many French companies. French labor unions see this controversy as a clash between the French and Anglo-Saxon models of transparency. To understand the moral reticence of French companies towards whistleblowing, we investigate five distinct perspectives: legal, economic, historical, philosophical and sociological. 1/ We first probe into the legal contradictions in French regulations and find in these paradoxes the symptoms of a national taboo. 2/We report on an economic survey, that gathers empirical data from 82 large French corporations, and analyzes different business sectors in France and the working population covered by a whistleblowing procedure. 3/ To elicit the etiology of this taboo, we return to the historical sources of the Dreyfus Affair and the Vichy regime, whose political traumas remain imprinted on the collective French memory. The linguistic confusion between the two French terms délation and dénonciation shows why whistleblowing is perceived in France more as an act of betrayal than of heroism. 4/ The philosophical roots of whistleblowing also shed light on the organizational behavior of French companies and the transparency they are struggling to promote. 5/Entangled in sociological ambiguities, we discuss why French companies see whistleblowing as a risk, not as a means to prevent risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The authors would like to thank Alan Jenkins, professor at ESSEC Business School, and Antonia Mills, research engineer at ESSEC Business School, for their assistance, help and support.

  2. Richard Lacayo & Amanda Ripley ‘Persons of The Year’ Time magazine 160 no27/1 (2002).

  3. Michel Rouger ‘Respect du droit national ou soumission à la régulation mondiale ?’ Les Echos 16 Nov. (2005) p 17.

  4. Marianne Bliman ‘Société Générale victime d’une fraude géante, de 4,9 milliards d’euros, d’ans ses activités de marché’ Les Echos 24 Jan. (2008).

  5. Linda K. Treviño & alii ‘Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review’ Journal of Management 32 no6 (2006) pp 951–990.

  6. See Peter B. Jubb ‘Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation’ Journal of Business Ethics 21 no1 (1999) pp 77–94; Tina Uys ‘Rational Loyalty and Whistleblowing: The South African Context’ Current Sociology 56 no6 (2008) pp 904–921; Wim Vandekerckhove & Ronald M. S. Commers ‘Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty’ Journal of Business Ethics 53 no1–2 (2004) pp 225–233.

  7. Joyce Rothschild ‘Managers’ Conduct and Workers’ Dignity: Making the Sociological Link’ Contemporary Sociology 33 no1 (2004) pp 5–7; Gary R. Rothwell & Norman J. Baldwin ‘Ethical Climates and Contextual Predictors of Whistle-Blowing’ Review of Public Personnel Administration 26 no3 (2006), pp 216–244; Gary R. Rothwell & Norman J. Baldwin ‘Whistle-Blowing and the Code of Silence in Police Agencies. Policy and Structural Predictors’ Crime Delinquency 53 (2007) pp 605–632.

  8. Marcia P. Miceli & Janet P. Near ‘Whistleblowing’ in Lawrence H. Peters, Charles R. Greer & Stuart A. Youngblood (eds) Blackwell Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Human Resource Management p 388, Oxford Blackwell Publishers 1997.

  9. See Marcia P. Miceli & Janet P. Near ‘Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistleblowing decisions’ Personnel Psychology 38 no3 (1985) pp 525–544; Janet P. Near & alii ‘Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistleblowing Process?’ Business Ethics Quarterly 14 no2 (2004) pp 219–242.

  10. Granville King ‘The effects of interpersonal closeness and issue seriousness on blowing the whistle’ Journal of Business Communication 34 (1997) pp 419–436.

  11. Marcia P. Miceli & Janet P. Near, ‘Relationships among value congruence, perceived victimization, and retaliation against whistleblowers: The case of internal auditors’ Journal of Management 20 no4 (1994) pp 773–794.

  12. Marcia P. Miceli & alii ‘Can laws protect Whistle-Blowers? Results of a naturally occurring field experiment’, in Work and Occupations 26 no1 (1999) pp 129–151.

  13. John P. Keenan & Steven Remington ‘Cultural Influences on Whistleblowing: A study of Philippine and U.S. Managers’ in Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute Apr. 2–5 (2002) Las Vegas, NV; Joyce Rothschild (2004) op. cit.

  14. Terance D. Miethe Whistleblowing at work: Tough choices in exposing fraud, waste, and abuse on the job Boulder Colorado Westview Press 1999.

  15. See John P. Keenan ‘Whistleblowing: A study of managerial differences’ Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 14 (2002) pp 17–32; Randy K. Chiu ‘Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control’ Journal of Business Ethics 43 no1–2 (2003) pp 65–74; Assad A. Tavakoli & alii ‘Culture and Whistleblowing. An Empirical Study of Croatian and United States Managers Utilizing Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions’ Journal of Business Ethics 43 no1–2 (2003) pp 49–64; Heungsik Park & alii ‘The Influence of Confucian Ethics and Collectivism on Whistleblowing Intentions: A Study of South Korean Public Employees’ Journal of Business Ethics 58 no4 (2005) pp 387–403; Alexander I. J. Dyck & alii ‘Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?’ University of Chicago CRSP Working paper no618 (2007).

  16. Sheryl Groeneweg ‘Three Whistleblower Protection Models: A comparative Analysis of Whistleblower Legislation in Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom’ Public Service Commission of Canada (Oct. 2001).

  17. Lucien Flament & Philippe Thomas ‘Le whistleblowing: à propos de la licéité des systèmes d’alerte éthique’ La semaine juridique no17 (Oct. 2005) pp 15–19.

  18. See Macha Sery ‘Le temps des corbeaux’ Le Monde 11 Dec. (2003) and Nicolas Cori ‘Métro, boulot, corbeau’ Libération 10 Mar. (2005).

  19. Marie Nicot ‘Le salarié mouchard pour lutter contre la fraude dans l’entreprise’ La Tribune 20 Oct. (2003) p 25.

  20. Michel Delacroix ‘L’avènement d’un marché européen de la délation?’ Les Echos 1st Mar. (2005).

  21. Sylvie Ramadier ‘A chaque société son propre mécanisme de signalement’ Les Echos 31 May (2005) p 15.

  22. Robert van Es ‘Inside and Outside The Insider: a Film Workshop in Practical Ethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 48 no4 (2003) pp 89–97; Marcia P. Miceli ‘Whistle-Blowing Research and The Insider: Lessons Learned and Yet to be Learned’ Journal of Management Inquiry 13 no4 (2004) pp 364–366.

  23. Terry M. Dworkin ‘SOX and whistleblowing’ Michigan Law Review 105 (2007) pp 1757–1780.

  24. Deloitte Business Ethics and Compliance in the Sarbanes-OxleyEra. A Survey by Deloitte and Corporate Board Member Magazine 2003.

  25. Medef Réflexion sur les principes devant guider la mise en place dans les entreprises d’une procédure de signalement par les salaries Paris Medef-Afep 2006.

  26. See the French Ministry of Employment website, www.travail.gouv.fr.

  27. See an order from the High court of Nanterre 6 Oct. (2004).

  28. Arnaud Nédellec La liberté d’expression des cadres (2004).

  29. Michel Goyer ‘The Transformation of Corporate Governance in France’ in US-France Analysis Series, Washington, MIT, Center on the United States and France — The Brookings Institution 2003.

  30. Alan Jenkins Employment Relations in France: Evolution and Innovation New York Kluwer 2000; Howard Gospel & Paul Willman ‘Changing Patterns of Employee Voice’ in John Storey (ed) Adding Value through Information and Consultation pp 126–144 Boston Palgrave 2005.

  31. Alan Jenkins (2000) op. cit.

  32. Janet P. Near & Marcia P. Miceli ‘Whistleblowing: Myth and Reality’ Journal of Management 22 no3 (1996) pp 507–526.

  33. Transparence International France Favoriser le déclenchement d’alerte en France Paris 2004; Cercle d’Ethique des Affaires Whistleblowing: quel système d’alerte éthique pour les entreprises françaises ? Paris Ethique éditions 2005; « Document d’orientation adopté par la Commission le 10 novembre 2005 pour la mise en œuvre de dispositifs d’alerte professionnelle conformes à la loi du 6 janvier 1978 modifiée en août 2004, relative à l’informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés » Commission National de l’Informatique et des Libertés [CNIL] Paris, 2005.

  34. Frederick A. Elliston ‘Anonymity and Whistleblowing’ Journal of Business Ethics 1 no1 (1982) pp 167–177; Craig R. Scott & Stephen A. Rains Anonymous Communication in Organizations: Assessing Use and Appropriateness’ Management Communication Quarterly 19 no2 (2005) pp 157–197.

  35. Gary R. Weaver & Linda K. Treviño ‘Compliance and Values Oriented Ethics Programs: Influences on Employees’ Attitudes and Behavior’ Business Ethics Quarterly 9 no2 (1999) pp 315–335.

  36. Jean-Paul Brodeur & Fabien Jobard (dir.) Citoyens et délateurs. La délation peut-elle être civique ? Paris Ed. Autrement 2005.

  37. Myron P. Glazer ‘The Whistleblowers: Exposing Corruption in Government and Industry’ New York Basic Books 1999; Philip H. Jos & alii ‘In praise of difficult people: a portrait of the committed whistleblower’ Public Administration Review 49 no6 (1989) pp 552–561.

  38. See Peter Jubb (1999) op. cit.

  39. Emile Zola ‘J’accuse !’ L’Aurore 13 Jan [1898] repr. in La Vérité en marche Paris Garnier-Flammarion 1969.

  40. Frank J. Barrett & Theodore R. Sarbin ‘Honor as a Moral Category: A Historical-Linguistic Analysis’ Theory & Psychology 18 n1 (2008) pp 5–25.

  41. Léon Blum L’affaire Dreyfus Paris Gallimard 1935.

  42. Colin Grant ‘Whistle Blowers: Saints of Secular Culture’ Journal of Business Ethics 39 no4 (2002) pp 391–399.

  43. Emmanuel Kant ‘Sur un prétendu droit de mentir par humanité’ [1797] in Théorie et Pratique Paris Vrin 2000.

  44. Benjamin Constant Oeuvres Politiques vol. 3 no6 Paris Charpentier [1797] (1874).

  45. Immanuel Kant [1797] op. cit.

  46. A very good example of this lies with the denunciation of torture: for it digs deeply into the very nature of Mankind, torture can never be justified or accepted. See Michel Terestchenko « Du bon usage de la torture ou comment les démocraties justifient l’injustifiable » Paris La Découverte 2008.

  47. Service Central de Prévention de la Corruption [SCPC] Rapport d’activité 2004 Paris Ministère de la Justice 2004.

  48. Philippe d’Iribarne La logique de l’honneur. Gestion des entreprises et traditions nationales Paris Seuil 1989; Philippe d’Iribarne ‘The Honour Principle in the ‘Bureaucratic Phenomenon’ Organization Studies 15 no1 (1994) pp 81–97.

  49. Ben Wempe ‘Contractarian Business Ethics: Credentials and Design Criteria’ Organization Studies 29 no10 (2008) pp 1337–1355.

  50. Philippe d’Iribarne (1994) op. cit. See especially p 87.

  51. Max Weber Le Savant et le politique Paris Plon [1919] (2002).

  52. Elie Wiesel & Jorge Semprun Se taire est impossible Paris Mille et une nuits 1995.

Download references

Authors
  1. Gregory Katz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc Lenglet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katz, G., Lenglet, M. Whistleblowing in French Corporations: Anatomy of a National Taboo. Philos. of Manag. 9, 103–122 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20109120

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20109120

Keywords

Search

Navigation