PDF

Theranostics 2020; 10(21):9741-9766. doi:10.7150/thno.46913 This issue Cite

Review

P21-Activated Kinase 1: Emerging biological functions and potential therapeutic targets in Cancer

Dahong Yao^1,2#, Chenyang Li^2#, Muhammad Shahid Riaz Rajoka², Zhendan He^1,2, Jian Huang⁴, Jinhui Wang⁴ , Jin Zhang^1,3

1. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Science Center, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, 518060, PR China.
2. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, PR China.
3. State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, China.
4. Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Medicine Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Baojian Road 157, Nangang District, Harbin 150081, PR China.
#These authors contributed equally to this work.

✉ Corresponding authors: Jinhui Wang, E-mail: wangjinhuiedu.cn; Tel/Tax: +86-755-86671989. Jin Zhang, E-mail: zhangjinjin8916com; Tel/Tax: (+86)28-85164063.

Abstract

The p21-Activated kinase 1 (PAK1), a member of serine-threonine kinases family, was initially identified as an interactor of the Rho GTPases RAC1 and CDC42, which affect a wide range of processes associated with cell motility, survival, metabolism, cell cycle, proliferation, transformation, stress, inflammation, and gene expression. Recently, the PAK1 has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in cancer due to its role in many oncogenic signaling pathways. Many PAK1 inhibitors have been developed as potential preclinical agents for cancer therapy. Here, we provide an overview of essential roles that PAK1 plays in cancer, including its structure and autoactivation mechanism, its crucial function from onset to progression to metastasis, metabolism, immune escape and even drug resistance in cancer; endogenous regulators; and cancer-related pathways. We also summarize the reported PAK1 small-molecule inhibitors based on their structure types and their potential application in cancer. In addition, we provide overviews on current progress and future challenges of PAK1 in cancer, hoping to provide new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Keywords: PAK1, structure, cancer, targets, resistance, small molecular inhibitors

Introduction

The p21-activated kinases (PAKs) belong to the family of serine-threonine kinases and have been identified as effectors of Cdc42 and Rac1 small GTPases [1]. PAKs are closely associated with a wide variety of cellular functions, including cytoskeletal motility, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation, mainly by a various substrate phosphorylation [2]. The PAK family consists of two subgroups; a subgroup I (PAK1, PAK2, and PAK3) and subgroup II (PAK4, PAK5, and PAK6) having display distinct as well as overlapping functions and are regulated by different mechanisms [3]. The distinct roles of PAK family members in normal tissue development have been investigated by using gene knockout mouse models, with the phenotypes ranging from having no apparent effect to early embryonic death. In mice, PAK1 ^(-/-) and PAK5 ^(-/-) null mice are viable and healthy, whereas loss of PAK2 or PAK4 could cause embryonic lethality, and PAK3 ^(-/-) would result in learning and memory defects [4]. PAKs' dysregulation is involved in cellular homeostasis and functions implicated in a number of human diseases, including cardiac disorders, neurological disorders, and cancers [5, 6]. Amongst the PAK family members, PAK1 and PAK4 are the most studied in human cancers, due to their central roles in many oncogenic signaling pathways, and they have emerged as potential therapeutic targets in cancer [7]. Because PAK4 has been well summarized, including its signaling, regulation, and specificity [8], here, we focus our discussion on PAK1 in cancer.

PAK1 gene amplification or protein overexpression was observed in many kinds of tumors, including ovarian cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma [9-11]. PAK1 overexpression has been identified as a diagnostic biomarker of overall survival and disease-specific survival in solid tumors patients [12]. Furthermore, the role of PAK1 in leukemia has attracted more and more attention recently [13, 14]. PAK1 acts as a protector in DNA-damage response caused by genotoxic therapeutic agents or radiotherapy via directly phosphorylating microchidia CW-type zinc finger 2 (MORC2-Ser739) and γH2AX [15]. PAK1 dysregulation has been documented to be closely associated with cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and drug resistance, and it has emerged as a promising target for cancer treatment [16]. Many PAK1 inhibitors have been developed as potential preclinical agents for cancer therapy [17]. In this paper, we review PAK1's roles in cancer, including its structure and autoactivation mechanism; its essential function from the onset, progression to metastasis, and even drug resistance in cancer; endogenous regulators; and cancer-related pathways. We also discuss the suitability of PAK1 as an anti-cancer drug target and recent advances in the development of PAK1 inhibitors based on their structure types. Furthermore, we provide our perspective on current advances and future challenges of PAK1 in cancer.

Structure and the autoactivation mechanism of PAK1

PAKs belong to the STE20 family of serine/threonine kinases, which is comprised of group I (PAK1, PAK2, and PAK3) and group II (PAK4, PAK5, and PAK6) based on sequence and structural homology [18]. Structurally, all six members contain a p21-binding domain (PBD) at the N-terminus for GTPase association, an autoinhibitory domain (AID), and a C-terminal kinase domain [19]. The regulatory domains of groups I and II are structurally distinct, resulting in a different activation mechanism. For group I PAKs, the PBD domain overlaps with the AID domain. In contrast, group II PAKs only carry an AID-like pseudosubstrate sequence that inactivates the kinase activity of the Cdc42-bound PBD domain [3]. PAK1 is the most extensively studied member of the group I PAKs, which is comprised of 545 residues, including a GTPase-binding region (residues 75-105), autoinhibitory domain (residues 70-149), and kinase domain (residues 272-523) [20] (Figure 1A, 1B). Interestingly, the autoactivation mechanism of PAK1 occurs via an unusual dimerization autoinhibitory to a multi-stage activation switch [21]. For the initial state, the PAK1 dimer is comprised of two PAK1 molecules in an asymmetric antiparallel manner (or face to face); one monomer adopts an active conformation, and the other is inactive [22]. The PBD domain overlapping with the AID domain occupies the cleft of the kinase domain of another PAK1 monomer and stabilizes a disabled catalytic site. Subsequently, the binding of an activated endogenous activator, such as Cdc42 and Rac, to the PBD initiates the interactions with the proximal amino acids and phosphoinositide, which disrupts the dimer and causes distinct changes in the conformation of the catalytic domain, resulting in the dissociation of AID domain from the kinase domain [23]. As a result, the activation loop is released and the unique Thr423 of the inactive monomer is phosphorylated via a trans-phosphorylation as the conventional substrate of another active monomer, which is very important for the full catalytic activity of PAK1 [24]. Once Thr423 has been phosphorylated, PAK1 can autophosphorylate at several sites (phosphoserine) within the first 250 amino acids, which could prevent the kinase from reverting to an inactive conformation (Figure 1C, 1D). By contrast, group II PAKs lack a defined inhibitory segment and are active in the absence of small GTPases. It is worth noting that phosphorylation can not only regulate the activity of PAK1, but also the key to PAK1 regulating various proteins to participate in various life processes of cancer [25].

PAK1 and cancer

PAK1 is frequently overexpressed or excessively activated in almost all cancer types, and it is more pronounced in malignancies [26]. For instance, PAK1 was found to be highly amplified and phosphorylated in breast cancer, which is the cumulative consequence of multiple cancer-related mutations, such as PIK3CA and TP53, and contributes to maintaining the fitness and survival of cancer cells under multiple pressures [27, 28]. Studies of the relationship between PAK1 and cancer were started in the mid-1990s. It was first reported that PAK1 was involved in the MAPK signal transduction in 1995 [29] and regulated actin cytoskeleton remolding in 1997 [30]. Subsequent studies revealed that PAK1 participated in cell migration and motility [31]. PAK1 was first confirmed to be involved in breast cancer cell proliferation and cancer progression in 2000 [32]. Over the last 20 years, researchers have increasingly recognized the role of PAK1 in the progression of cancer. PAK1 is now involved in almost every stage of the cancer process, from onset to progression to metastasis, and even drug resistance [33, 34] (Figure 2). PAK1 is also considered a cancer hallmark that modulates cancer therapeutic outcomes [14, 34]. Here, we review the function and regulation of PAK1 in cancer.

 Figure 1 

PAK1 structure and the autoactivation mechanism. (A) Schematic representation of the P21-activated kinases including Group I PAKs and Group II PAKs. Of them, PAK1-3 are divvied into Group I PAKs and PAK4-7 are divvied into Group II PAKs. (B) PAK1 contains a p21-binding domain (PBD) at the N-terminus for GTPase association, an auto inhibitory domain (AID) and a C-terminal kinase domain. (C) PAK1 can be activated or inhibited by numerous regulators and inhibitors. (D) The autoactivation mechanism of PAK1 which mainly dependent on phosphorylation.

 Figure 2 

PAK1 in cancer progression, immunity, metabolism and drug resistance. (A) In different cancer stages, PAK1 functions properly to promote cancer progression, including regulation of cancer-related pathways, angiogenesis, tumor microenvironment remodeling, immune evasion, and apoptosis inhibition. Similarly, these effects also contribute to drug resistance in cancer therapies. (B) PAK1 can help cancer cells change their metabolic pattern to adapt to new survival environment. In addition, PAK1 can affect the vitality of immune cells and help cancer cells immune escape. (C) PAK1 promotes the resistance of cancer cells to various anti-tumor drugs through the PAK1 PPI network.

PAK1 in cancer initiation

The cancer initiation is the accumulation of single or multiple gene mutations, the aberrant interactions of different signaling, and the result of cancer cells proliferating and surviving in the microenvironment [35]. Oncogenic transformation requires global fine-tuning of oncogene-regulated signals, including the rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton, response to the environment, immune evasion, and eventual survival. PAK1 is one of the central nodes in this complex oncogenic signaling pathway network, and it can promote oncogenic transformation in a variety of ways [36]. Functionally, PAK1 is an oncogene that when overexpressed or excessively activated plays an important role in tumorigenesis [27]. When the tumor initially forms, it suffers relatively low survival pressure because oxygen and nutrients are relatively abundant. The activation of PAK1 allows it to participate in cancer cell proliferation pathways to inhibit apoptosis and facilitate the survival of cancer cells. Indeed, recent studies have been shown that PAK1 inhibition impeded carcinogenesis in several tumors, such as breast cancer, intestinal tumor, lung cancer, and melanoma [37-39]. In addition, due to the effect of PAK1 on chromatin remodeling [40], many oncogenes are activated and then participate in the tumorigenesis process [41]. Elsewhere, it was found that PAK-dependent microchidia CW-type zinc finger 2 (MORC2) phosphorylation promoted DNA repair to maintain cancer cell fitness [42]. And in gastric cancer, high phosphorylation of MORC2 is always accompany with high expression of PAK1 and involves in poor prognosis [43]. Intriguingly, although cancer-associated mutations are often hereditary, not all cancer-causing mutations develop into cancer, and they also require the remodeling effect of the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, it is not surprising that the PAK1-induced inflammatory microenvironment is another accomplice in the process of tumorigenesis [44]. PAK1-regulated STAT3-NF-κB signaling continues to activate the inflammatory response, and the releases of IL-1α and IL-18 will induce cancer cell proliferation, survival, and immunosuppression. Collectively, PAK1 activation makes cancer cells more robust and invisible to the immune system, thus paving the way for further proliferation.

PAK1 in cancer growth and angiogenesis

Cancer cells must grow into a sufficiently large population before they can spread and metastasize. These cancer cells are just like a small social group, each with a division of labor and always ready for further progression [35]. Cancer cells are often in a state of hypoxia and nutrient deficiency due to their uncontrolled rapid proliferation. Hypoxia presents both challenges and opportunities for tumors. In principle, hypoxia is not conducive to the proliferation and survival of cancer cells, but the hypoxia response will exacerbate the instability of tumor genome and microenvironment [45]. PAK1 can stimulate the activation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) to promote the adaptation of tumor cells to hypoxic conditions and further induce metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells [46]. On the one hand, PAK1 takes part in HER2, EGFR, MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and Wnt/β-catenin pathways and properly coordinates these signals to ensure tumor cell proliferation under hypoxic conditions [37]. On the other hand, PAK1 accelerates angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment to ensure energy supply. In this process, PAK1 can assist with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) - and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated Raf-1 and MEK1 activation to escape from apoptosis during angiogenesis [47]. PAK1 regulated HIFs, p38, Akt and NF-κB activation also contributes to angiogenesis [48, 49]. Besides, regulation of cell cycle progression, apoptosis resistance, and immune escape; PAK1 also creates favorable conditions for the formation of tumor society. Collectively, PAK1 activation contributes to the tumor society's stability and progress.

PAK1 in cancer metastasis and survival

One of the most studied biological functions of PAK1 is their contribution in cancer metastasis. Cancer metastasis is an extremely complex process involving multiple chronological stages. In simple terms, it includes local invasion and infiltration into blood vessels, the survival of tumor cells in circulation, extravasation to secondary areas, and metastasis to new tissues and organs [50]. PAK1 can participate in almost every stage of the transfer process. First, tumor cells must break through the underlying basement membrane of the tumor, namely, the degradation of the extracellular matrix. This process requires the participation of proteolytic enzymes, and PAK1 can promote tumor epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) by up-regulating the expression of matrix metalloproteinase genes and activating transcription factors, such as snail and twist [26, 48]. In addition, cancer cell metastasis must undergo a signal-dependent cytoskeleton remodeling process. It is worth noting that PAK1 was reported to exhibit the function of cytoskeletal regulation in 1997 [30]. Increasingly, studies have shown that many proteins involved in cytoskeleton formation and regulation are the phosphorylated substrates of PAK1, including the microtubule-destabilizing proteins stathmin [51], filamin [52], and the actin-binding proteins LIM-kinase (LIMK) [53], p41-Arc subunit of human Arp2/3 complex [54], and tubulin cofactor B (TCoB) [55]. PAK1 regulates these substrates to maintain the flexibility of the cytoskeleton and to enable cells to migrate. Interestingly, RUN and FYVE domain containing 3 (RUFY3), which can be up-regulated by PAK1, localizes with F-actin and formats F-actin-enriched protrusive structures to promote gastric cancer cells migration and invasion [56]. Another substrate of PAK1, Integrin-linked kinase (ILK), can be phosphorylated by PAK1 at threonine 173 and serine 246 to promote breast cancer cell motility and proliferation [57]. After cancer cells penetrate blood vessels and enter the circulatory system, the cells are relatively fragile. They may have to adapt to different living environments after leaving the original suitable living circumstances. Once entering the circulatory system, it is easier for a cancer cell to be recognized and killed by the immune system, suffering from a variety of cellular pressures [58]. Generally, there are relatively few cancer cells that can survive in the circulatory system. Fortunately, PAK1 can help the immune escape of tumor cells. Of note, miR-132, a tumor suppressor that can specifically impede hematogenous metastasis, can be regulated by PAK1 through PAK1-ATF2-miR132 cascade in gastric cancer. In short, PAK1 phosphorylates ATF2 at serine 62 to inhibit its transcription factor activity, and miR-132 happens to be one of its transcription activation objects [59]. Finally, in the process of extravasation of cancer cells to the secondary area and to new tissues and organs, chronic inflammation induced by PAK1 promotes cancer cell survival in the new environment through the remodeling of the extracellular matrix. The inhibitory effect of PAK1 on apoptosis is also indispensable during the entire metastasis process [60], and the inhibition of apoptosis also ensures the survival of cancer cells to the greatest extent. Although cancer cells may face a bleak situation during metastasis, when they survive in new tissues, PAK1 can promote their adaptation to the new environment, rendering them dormant or enabling them to further breed.

PAK1 in cancer immunity and metabolism

To survive, cancer cells must respond intelligently to the body's immune system and various metabolic pressures. During the survival and expansion of cancer cells, the immune system can recognize and eliminate some of the cancer cells, especially during the metastasis in the circulatory system. Interestingly, PAK1 can enable the immune evasion to adapt to different microenvironments by regulating cancer cells' metabolisms, such as switching to oxidative phosphorylation in an aerobic environment, or switching to fatty acid oxidation in a high-lipid environment. PAK1 can also induce the activation of NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response, thereby making cancer cells partly immune to escape [61]. Recently, a study found in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), PAK1 knockout improved the number of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and inhibited the activation of pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) [62]. Furthermore, PAK1 is also involved in the elongation of activated T-cells [63]. As we all know, hepatitis can cause liver cancer, while interestingly; PAK1 was confirmed to help HCV RNA replication through PI3K and ERK activation [64]. In addition, the metabolic pattern of cancer cells is often very different from normal cells. Most solid tumors are more dependent on glycolysis for energy supply, and some brain tumors or blood cancers are more inclined to oxidative phosphorylation addiction. Importantly, PAK1 plays a charming role in affecting cancer cell metabolism. In cervical cancer and colorectal cancer, PAK1 can promote HIF1-α activation to adapt to oxygen-deficient conditions [46]. Moreover, PAK1 can regulate glucose metabolism in cancer. Phosphoglucomutase 1 (PGM), which is a key glucose utilization regulator, was identified to be a substrate of PAK1. PAK1 phosphorylates PGM at threonine 466 to enhance its enzymatic activity. The activation of PGM further helps cancer cells glucose and energy homeostasis [65]. Another study found that hyperglycaemic will lead to the activation of CDC42-PAK1 signaling, which may increase the oncogenic of breast cancer cells [66]. In conclusion, the effects of PAK1 on immunity and metabolism can regulate the progression of cancer in a variety of situations.

PAK1 in cancer drug resistance

Currently the biggest challenge in cancer therapy is cancer drug resistance. The constant emergence of resistance-related mutations, activation of compensatory pathways, and influence of other unknown factors have resulted in the situation that many drugs with good initial effects quickly lose their therapeutic effect. In addition, due to the heterogeneity of tumors, many anti-tumor treatments have artificially screened a group of super tumor cells that have evolved entirely and are not responding [67]. Various factors accumulation makes cancer treatment outcomes often less than ideal. PAK1 has played a vital role in the drug resistance process in multiple tumors, and synergistic inhibition of PAK1 always benefits the tumor treatment (Figure 2B). In EGFR-mutated lung cancer, inhibitors of EGFR showed limited effectiveness because of specific site mutations. Since EGFR and PAK1 can both activate the Ras-MAPK and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways, inhibition of PAK1 synergistically enhances the inhibitory effect on these pathways. This is why PAK1 inhibitors can significantly enhance the therapeutic effect of EGFR-TKI inhibitors in EGFR-TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer and lung adenocarcinoma [68, 69]. Furthermore, in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), PAK1 inhibition displayed synergistic effect with TKIs [70]. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PAK1 activation triggers the Wnt/β-catenin signaling cascade that is involved in resistance to Gemcitabine. Therefore, it is not surprising that PAK1 inhibition can enhance the response of resistant and non-resistant cells to Gemcitabine [71]. Similarly, the inhibition PAK1-regulated Wnt/β-catenin pathway also enhanced the sensitivity of cancer cells to Cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer [72]. In addition, PAK1 activation can enhance a cancer cell's resistance to BRAF inhibitors, which is mainly due to the activation of the AKT pathway. And the inhibition of PAK1 can suppress not only the activation of MEK-ERK but also the conduction of AKT signaling pathway [73]. In Tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells, the inhibition of PAK1 restores the sensitivity of cancer cells to tamoxifen to improve the therapeutic effect [74]. In BRAF-mutant melanomas, the activation of PAK1 is contribute to the acquired drug resistance to BRAFi and combined BRAFi and MEKi therapies [75]. In renal epithelial cell carcinoma, PAK1 plays an important role in the activation of the NF-κB/IL-6 pathway, which involves Sunitinib resistance [61]. PAK1 is also involved in the resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to MET inhibitors, and PAK1 inhibitor attenuated tumor growth and metastasis in vivo [76]. Similar effects have been observed in lymphatics that are resistant to PI3K/mTOR inhibitors [77]. As a core regulator of cell proliferation and metastasis networks, PAK1 plays a prominent role in cancer drug resistance.

Overall, PAK1 plays an important role in cancer progression, from the formation of cancer to the enhancement of the cancer cells' motor capacity, their infiltration of the circulatory system, and eventual metastasis to new tissues for survival and even cancer's drug response. Hence, the PAK1 has been identified as an attractive target for cancer treatment. Also, it is important to understand the regulation of PAK1 and the mechanism of regulation involved in PAK1. Next, we will further discuss the specific mechanism by which PAK1 participates in the course of the life of cancer cells.

Endogenous upstream regulators of PAK1

To further understand the regulation mechanism of PAK1 in cells, we first summarize the endogenous upstream PAK1 regulators. Here, we review the regulation of PAK1 activity in terms of transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional modification, and protein-protein interaction network. Transcriptional regulation of PAK1 activity is mainly mediated by microRNAs (miRNAs), which directly or indirectly recognize the mRNA of PAK1 and guide the silencing complex to degrade the PAK1 mRNA or to suppress the translation of PAK1 [78]. The regulation of miRNAs on target genes is also a hot spot in oncology. Studies have revealed that miR-485-5p [79], miR-140-5p [80], miR-96 [81], miR-7 [82], miR-494 [83], miR-34b [84], and miR-145 [85] can directly target and degrade the mRNA of PAK1 in order to block the translation of PAK1. In addition, PAK1 can be directly activated by interaction with Rho-related GTPases CDC42 and RAC1 [86]. However, some miRNAs targeting these activators can also regulate the activity of PAK1, such as miR-142-3p and miR-4715-5p targeting RAC1 [87, 88], and miR302-367, miR‑29a‑3p, and miR-15b targeting CDC42 [48, 89, 90]. Other miRNAs perform other functions. For instance, miR-146a can target VEGF to inhibit VEGF/CDC42/PAK1 signaling [91]; miR-331-3p directly targets ErbB2 and VAV2 and inhibits PAK1 activity through the ErbB2/VAV2/Rac1/PAK1 pathway [92]; and miR-194-3p inhibits PAK1 activity through the PI3K/AKT/CDC42/PAK1 pathway [93]. Certain long non-coding RNAs can target miRNAs to affect PAK1 activity. For instance, LncRNA-H19 suppresses miR-15b expression to activate the CDC42-PAK1 pathway [90]. LINC00460 promotes tumor progression through sponging miR-485-5p and up-regulating PAK1 [79], and MALAT1 interacts with miR-140-5p to abolish the inhibition of PAK1 [80] (Figure 3A). In addition, transcriptional modification by transcription factor is another major regulation of PAK1. nonclustered H2.0-like homeobox (HLX) is a homeobox domain-containing transcription factors that can regulate PAK1 transcription [13]. The post-transcriptional modification of PAK1 is mainly mediated by phosphorylation and acetylation. Except for RAC1 and CDC42, several other proteins can regulate PAK1 activity through phosphorylation. LKB1 can suppress PAK1 activity through phosphorylation of Thr109 [94]; MLK3 directly activates PAK1 kinase activity via phosphorylating PAK1 on Ser133 and Ser204 sites [95]; and Her2, cytoplasmic p27, bFGF, CK2, JAK2, and PDK1 all can phosphorylate PAK1 to activate its activity [2, 96-100]. In addition, elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 3 (ELP3) can acetylate PAK1 at K420 to inhibit the dimerization of PAK1, which further promotes its activity [101]. Of note, the protein-protein network is another way to regulate PAK1 activity. Certain proteins can indirectly affect PAK1 activity via RAC1 and CDC42 regulation, such as PKC iota [102], RIT1 [103], NCK1 [104], and P-REX1 [105]. Other tumor promoters, such as PI3K and CKIP-1, both regulate PAK1 activity via the protein-protein network [98]. Some representative examples are shown in (Table 1) (Figure 3B). Through the summary of these endogenous upstream regulators of PAK1, in addition to an understanding of the internal regulation mechanism of PAK1, we also believe that, through the intervention of these factors, such as the development of ncRNA drugs for PAK1, the destruction of the PAK1-related PPI network might be beneficial for coming up with new strategies for cancer treatment.

PAK1 regulated cancer-related pathways

PAK1 participates in multiple signaling pathways of cancer development through regulating various substrates. Here, we mainly review the specific mechanisms of PAK1 in Wnt/β-Catenin, EGFR/HER2/MAPK, NF-κB and apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, autophagy, EMT, metastasis pathways and the crosstalk between PAK1 and some other signaling.

PAK1 in Wnt/β-Catenin pathway

The Wnt signaling cascade is a primary regulator of human/animal growth and development, Wnt/β-Catenin pathway is one of most typical Wnt signaling pathways. The occurrence and development of multiple tumors are closely related to the abnormal activation of the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway [118-119]. Wnts are basically growth stimulatory factors that promote cell proliferation, while β-Catenin is the key switch to regulate this signal [120]. PAK1 plays a vital role in regulating this pathway (Figure 4A). On the other-hand, PAK1 activation leads to the phosphorylation of S675 and S663 of β-catenin to stabilize β-catenin, and then to activate the transcription of target genes, such as MYC, CyclinD1, MMP, and PPARγ, to promote cancer cell proliferation and migration [117]. Also, PAK1 inhibits GSK3 activity via AKT1 activation to eliminate the inhibitory effect on β-catenin [121, 122]. In fact, PAK1 and Wnt/β-Catenin do contribute to cancer development. For instance, PAK1 activation implicated in Wnt/β-Catenin drives early phases of oncogenesis and cancer growth in colon cancer [123]. In non-small cell lung cancer, PAK1-β-Catenin-regulated cancer cell stemness contributes to chemoresistance [124]. Activated PAK1 fine-tuning the Wnt/β-Catenin pathways contribute to regulating cancer proliferation and metastasis. The cooperative inhibition of PAK1 and Wnt/β-Catenin is a new strategy for cancer therapy.

PAK1 in EGFR/HER2/MAPK pathways

The ERBB family of receptor tyrosine kinases are essential for tumorigenesis, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and ERBB2 (HER2) are prestigious. ERBB family receptors can activate multiple downstream oncogenic pathways, including PI3K-AKT and MAPK pathways, to regulate cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, apoptosis, and motility [125]. EGFR and HER2 in cancer are often characterized by inappropriate activation, including point mutation, overexpression, partial deletions, and autocrine ligand-receptor stimulation [126], and their roles in cancer are best-defined [127]. The activation of ERBB pathways can recruit and activate a series of downstream proteins involved in different signaling transduction by phosphorylation [128]. In this section, we mainly focus on the role of PAK1 in the EGFR/HER2/MAPK network.

PAK1 is involved in the regulation of HER2-PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway (Figure 4B). Studies have proven that PI3K activates PAK1 via phosphorylation of its upstream regulator Rac [129], and Rac can activate AKT. AKT and PAK1 can directly stimulate each other's activity [130]. The crosstalk between the PI3K-AKT and MAPK-ERK signaling pathways has always been a hot spot in cancer research, and it is a significant contributor to cancer drug resistance. The combination of these two pathways allows cancer cells to survive in a variety of anticancer drugs. Specifically, Ras can directly activate PI3K, while AKT and Raf can regulate each other to switch cancer cell proliferation or cell cycle progression [131, 132]. PAK1 also made itself a contribution in this network by activating Raf, MEK, and ERK, while Raf in turn activates PAK1 [133, 134]. PAK1 also contributes to cancer progression through inducing JNK activation [135].

 Figure 3 

Endogenous upstream regulators of PAK1. (A) miRNAs and LncRNAs that involve in regulating the expression of PAK1. Of them, miRNAs target PAK1 or PAK-related proteins to regulate PAK1 expression. Moreover, LncRNAs regulate PAK1 activity via target PAK1-related miRNAs. (B) The protein interaction is another way to regulate PAK1 activity. The proteins can regulate PAK1 activity mainly through phosphorylation, acetylation, transcriptional regulation, and PPI network. The green proteins in the figure inhibit PAK1 activity and the blue proteins activate PAK1 activity.

Increasingly, studies have revealed the important role of PAK1-regulated EGFR/HER2/MAPK pathways in cancer. Inhibition PAK1 could block the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway to benefit breast cancer therapy [136]. Reducing PAK1 activity will diminish the proliferation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) through inhibiting the Raf/Mek/Erk pathway [137]. PAK1 occupies a relatively central position in the EGFR/HER2/MAPK pathway network. The co-inhibition of PAK1 and other core proteins in the network, such as AKT and MEK, may also become a new strategy for cancer treatment.

 Figure 4 

PAK1 is a key molecular determinant in major cell proliferation pathways. (A) PAK1 promotes Wnt / β-catenin signaling via activating β-catenin. The activation of β-catenin by PAK1 is mainly through direct phosphorylation and PAK1-AKT-GSK-3β pathway. After activation, β-catenin translocates to the nucleus and activates the transcription of a series of oncogenes, such as MYC and MMPs. (B) PAK1 is at the core of EGFR/HER2/MAPK pathways, and PAK1 precisely regulates EGFR/HER2/MAPK network to regulate cancer cell.

PAK1 in NF-κB and apoptosis pathways

NF-kB signaling directly or indirectly controls cancer cells inflammation, proliferation, EMT, survival, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Also it controls cancer stem cell formation, stress responses, cell metabolism, immunosuppression, and further therapeutic resistance. NF-κB activation is often observed in malignant cells and tumor microenvironments [138]. NF-κB also implicates apoptosis regulation in cancer cells [139]. Apoptosis is an evolutionarily conserved pathway of cell death and plays an essential role in proper development and maintaining homeostasis. Apoptosis is mainly controlled by BCL-2 family proteins containing pro-apoptotic and pro-survival members, as well as determines the cell's life and death according to the environment and pressure that the cell encountered. Inducing cancer cell apoptosis has long been the main strategy for cancer treatment [140]. PAK1 also performs roles in the regulation of apoptosis and NF-κB pathway for cancer development (Figure 5). For example, the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor (GHRH-R) can promote human gastric cancer via PAK1-NF-κB signaling [141]. First, PAK1 inhibits apoptosis via suppressing the pro-apoptotic protein (BAD, Bim) and activating the pro-survival protein (Bcl-2). Functionally, PAK1 phosphorylates Raf-1 at Ser-338 and Ser-339 to promote its translocation to mitochondria for further phosphorylation of BAD at Ser-112. Mitochondria Raf-1 disrupts the formation of Bcl-2-BAD complex and enhances the anti-apoptosis ability of Bcl-2 [142]. Pak1 can also directly phosphorylate BAD at Ser111 [143]. PAK1 can also phosphorylate a dynein light chain 1 (DLC1) to resist apoptosis via interacting with pro-apoptotic protein Bim [144]. PAK1 promotes the NF-κB pathway through stimulating JNK and NF-κB interacting kinase (NIK). JNK can phosphorylate IKKα/β to accelerate IκB phosphorylation. RelA is then released from the IκB complex and is activated. NIK activates IKKα, which in turn activates the RelB-p52 complex by phosphorylation. The activated RelA and RelB-p52 translocate to the nucleus to induce the stimulation of target genes involved in cancer proliferation, migration, and survival [44]. The conclusion is that PAK1 inhibition could be a favorable strategy for NF-κB-dependent and apoptosis-resistant cancer treatment.

 Figure 5 

PAK1 plays a central role in apoptosis and NF-κB pathways. PAK1 can inhibit apoptosis through Raf1 and DLC1 regulated Bim inhibition and Bcl-2 activation. In addition, PAK1 stimulate JNK-IκB-RelA and NIK-IKKα-RelB/p52 pathways to promote inflammation to promote cancer cell proliferation, migration and survival.

PAK1 in cell cycle pathways

A common phenomenon in cancer is abnormal expression or regulation of cell cycle proteins, which leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation. Cell proliferation depends on the regulation of the cell cycle progress, which is generally divided into four phases: G0/G1, S, G2, and M phases. This process is directly regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), checkpoint kinases, Aurora kinases, and Polo-like kinases (PLKs) [145]. Intriguingly, these proteins are directly or indirectly regulated by PAK1 (Figure 6). Aurora A, an important centrosomal kinase, can be activated by PAK1 by phosphorylation at Thr288 and Ser342, and then stimulates mitosis [146]. Therefore, PAK1 and Aurora A dual-inhibition could benefit breast cancer treatment [147]. In addition, PAK1 phosphorylation of the actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B (Arpc1b) can regulate actin networks, which contributes to cell motility [54]. Arpc1b and Aurora A are both activator and substrate of each other [148]. The PAK1-induced activation of Arpc1b and Aurora A initiates a series of subsequent caspase cascades that contribute to mitosis. Microtubules dynamics regulation is also the main way of PAK1 to regulate mitosis. Microtubules have the dynamic characteristics of polymerization and depolymerization, which play an important role in the movement of chromosomes during mitosis. Tubulin cofactor B (TCoB), which exhibits overexpression and hyperphosphorylation in breast cancer can be directly bound and phosphorylated on serine 65 and 128 by PAK1, and then interact with tubulin to regulate the polymerization of new microtubules and mitosis [55]. Interestingly, mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK), another substrate of PAK1 can regulate microtubule depolymerization when phosphorylated by PAK1 on serine 192 and 111 [149]. Furthermore, the precise regulation of these two substrates by PAK1 constitutes the epitome of regulating mitosis by regulating microtubule dynamics. Strikingly, PLK1 activation is another strategy that PAK1 regulates mitosis. PLK1 is an important cell cycle regulator that can enable mitotic entry by phosphorylating cdc25 and cyclinB1 [150, 151]. Interestingly, PAK1 can also regulate cyclinB1 activity via transcription and expression enhancing through NF-KB activation in gastric cancer [152]. Moreover, the oncogenic transcription factor MYC, another crucial downstream effector of PAK1, can regulate several cyclin related kinases (CDK4/6, cyclin D, CDK2, and cyclin E) to promote cell cycle progression [153]. The phosphorylation of Raf on Serine 338 by PAK1 promotes its kinase activity to activate cell cycle checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2) to regulate the DNA damage response, which contributes to cancer cell survival [15]. In addition, PAK1 can affect the cell cycle by regulating the dynamic changes of chromosomes. For one case, PAK1 phosphorylates histone H3 to regulate chromosome dynamic for further cell cycle regulation in breast cancer cells [154]. For another case, PAK1 phosphorylated MORC2 at Serine 739 when cells encounter DNA damage, and the phosphorylation of MORC2 then facilitates chromatin remodeling [42]. Considering the vital role of PAK1 in the cell cycle, several studies have revealed that dual targeting PAK1 inhibition and cell cycle destruction would reap significant benefits in cancer therapy [155, 156].

 Figure 6 

PAK1 contributes a lot in cell cycle progression. PAK1 triggers cell cycle progression through phosphorylation of some substrate proteins, including AuroraA, Arpc1b, PLK1, histone H3, MORC2, NF-κB and c-Raf. In addition, PAK1 activates Myc to stimulate the activity of CDK2/CyclinE and CDK4/6/CyclinD to promote cell cycle profression. Moreover, PAK1 can regulate tubulin polymerization and polymerization via TCoB and MACK to play a role in cell cycle regulation.

 Figure 7 

PAK1 in autophagy pathways. PAK1 regulates autophagy via direct or indirect regulation. Acetylation of PAK1 could phosphorylate ATG5 to inhibit its ubiquitination-dependent degradation to promote autophagy. In addition, PAK1-AKT-mTOR signaling is another key pathway that involved in PAK1-regulated autophagy. Moreover, PAK1-mediated autophagy-related genes expression is also contribute to autophagy regulation.

PAK1 in autophagy pathways

With Yoshinori Ohsumi winning the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his research on autophagy, the role of autophagy in cancer has gradually become a hot spot in cancer diagnosis and therapy, and for its dual-role, study on autophagy in cancer is even more fascinating. Interestingly, PAK1 also plays a role in the regulation of autophagy via direct or indirect mechanism. For instance, PAK1 can phosphorylate at ATG5 at the Thr101 to prevent its ubiquitination-dependent degradation. In addition, the phosphorylation of ATG5 by PAK1 also promotes the formation of ATG5-ATG12-ATG16L, which is one of the core complexes of autophagy with E3 ligase activity, and PAK1-ATG5 induced autophagy promotes glioblastoma (GBM) growth [101]. As to indirectly regulation, PAK1 can activate AKT-mTOR pathway, and interestingly, mTOR is not only a key cell growth regulator, but also an important autophagy-related protein. In breast cancer, the inhibition of PAK1 by Ivermectin could inhibit AKT activity thus decreasing mTOR activity to induce cytostatic autophagy [157]. In addition to these examples, the regulation of PAK1 on other pathways, such as MAPKs and NF-κB, can indirectly regulate autophagy as well (Figure 7). Therefore, considering the relationship between PAK1 and autophagy, the development of a therapeutic regimen targeting PAK1-autophagy might be a potential strategy for cancer treatment.

 Figure 8 

PAK1 fine-tuning the PPI network to accelerate cancer EMT and metastasis. PAK1 can activate Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K-AKT, Ras-MAPK, JNK and NF-κB pathways to promote the transcription of twist, snail and slug. These EMT-promoting transcription factors promote the expression of MMPs, while inhibit the expression of epithelial cell specific protein, such as E-cadherin to promote cancer EMT and metastasis.

PAK1 in EMT and metastasis pathways

The role of PAK1 in EMT and metastasis has been a hot topic in the field of cancer. Numerous studies have confirmed that the PAK1-regulated pathway network contributes to EMT and metastasis in multiple types of cancer. In colon cancer, PAK1-LIMK1-Cofilins signaling is a driving force of EMT [158]. The PAK1/β-catenin pathway also plays an essential role in ovarian cancer. [159]. Snail up-regulation and β-catenin activation induced by PAK1 are the main processes of cancer metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma [160]. In parallel to hepatocellular carcinoma, PAK1 can promote Snail transcription by directly binding to Snail in lung cancer cells [161]. PAK1 promotes cancer EMT and metastasis through a network of multiple pathways. A hallmark of EMT is the loss of epithelial cell integrity resulting from degradation of the adhesive connections that maintain contact between epithelial cells. This degradation is mainly accomplished by MMPs driven by EMT-promoting transcription factors, such as twist, snail, and slug [162]. Intriguingly, these EMT-promoting transcription factors can all be activated by PAK1. PAK1 can activate Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K-AKT, Ras-MAPK, JNK, and NF-κB pathways, which can promote the transcription of twist, snail, and slug. These EMT-promoting transcription factors promote the expression of MMPs, while inhibiting the expression of epithelial cell-specific proteins, such as E-cadherin [163] (Figure 8). Cancer cells can further metastasize and deteriorate under the programming of a signal network regulated by PAK1. Although the multi-faceted promotion of cancer by PAK1 is disturbing, it also provides an opportunity for the treatment of most PAK1-dependent cancers.

Cross-talk between PAK1 and other signaling pathways

In addition to the classical cancer pathways that PAK1 mainly participates in, the crosstalk between PAK1 and other pathways is also crucial for the development of cancer (Figure 9). For instance, transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) pathway, which is an important regulatory pathway in cellular life, is also a key pathway in cancer. And interestingly, TGFβ pathway plays a two-sided role in cancer [164]. It is worth noting that the crosstalk between PAK1 and TGFβ pathway is also important in cancer proliferation, angiogenesis, EMT and metastasis regulation. In prostate cancer, PAK1 was found to inhibit TGFβ expression to promote cancer cell growth and migration. Intriguingly, the overexpression of TGFβ in turn enhances the activation of PAK1 to promote EMT [165, 166]. In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the up-regulation of transforming growth factor-β receptor type 1 (TGFBR1) can also stimulate the activation of PAK1 to promote tumorigenesis [167]. Except for TGFβ signaling, Notch, Hippo/YAP and STAT5 signaling pathways are also involved in PAK1-regulated cancer progression. Importantly, both PAK1 and Notch often exhibit dysregulation in tumors. SHARP, a co-repressor of Notch signaling, was found to be a substrate of PAK1. And PAK1 phosphorylated SHARP at Ser3486 and Thr3568 to inhibit the activation of Notch target genes to regulate cancer destiny [168]. As for Hippo/YAP cascade, the activation of FAK-ILK-PAK1 signaling will suppress the Hippo/YAP pathway to inhibit its tumor-suppressor role thus promoting the liver cancer cells cytoskeletal modulation [169]. Remarkably, the crosstalk between PAK1 and STAT5 signaling is of great significance in the treatment and prognosis of leukemia. We all know that FLT3 and KIT oncogenic mutants are critical for the development of leukemia. A study found that these oncogenic mutants will activate FAK/Tiam1/Rac1/PAK1 signaling to further activate STAT5 and form a Rac1-PAK1-STAT5 complex to promote leukemogenesis via several oncogene activations [170]. And the BCR-ABL fusion gene (BCR-ABL) is another oncogenic factor of leukemia which exhibits different subtypes with discrepant prognosis. A recent study discovered that the PAK1-STAT5 axis contributes to the different prognosis of BCR-ABL subtypes [171]. Therefore, the crosstalk between PAK1 and other pathways is also not negligible for the treatment of cancer. We can develop a treatment strategy targeting PAK1 PPI network that is personalized according to the molecular characteristics of particular cancer.

 Figure 9 

The crosstalk between PAK1 and other cancer-related pathways. PAK1 can also regulate the proliferation and cytoskeletal movement of cancer cells via crosstalk with the Hippo-YAP signaling pathway and the TGF-β signaling pathway. In addition, PAK1 can promote tumorigenesis and angiogenesis through Notch and STAT5 signaling pathways activation.

PAK1 inhibitors as a strategy for cancer therapy

Given the extensive cancer-related functions of PAK1, significant efforts have been made to develop PAK1 inhibitors from pharmaceutical and academic settings. According to the different binding modes in the kinase domain, these PAK1 inhibitors are classified into ATP-competitive inhibitors and allosteric inhibitors.

ATP-competitive PAK inhibitors

Indolocarbazole-based inhibitors

K-252a, an indolocarbazole alkaloid isolated from Nocardiopsis sp., was the first small molecule to be reported as a PAK1 inhibitor with a Ki value of 2.4 nM, but it only showed weak antiproliferatory activity in vitro [172, 173]. Based on the K-252a scaffold, several K-252a derivatives were designed and synthesized, including the noted KTD606 (a K252a dimer) and CEP1347, which could suppress the proliferation of v-Ha-RAS-transformed NIH 3T3 cells but not normal cells [174]. Staurosporine, another natural product with an indolocarbazole scaffold, was discovered to be a potent ATP-competitive PAK1 inhibitor with a sub-nanomolar level affinity against a broad range of kinases, particularly against PAK1 with an IC₅₀ value of 0.75 nM [175]. Although the poor kinase selectivity of Staurosporine has limited its preclinical use, it is still a useful drug and a promising lead for optimization to obtain higher kinase selectivity PAK1 inhibitors. Λ-FL172 is a staurosporine-inspired octahedral ruthenium complex, which was documented as a potent PAK1 inhibitor with an IC₅₀ of 130 nM. Λ-FL172 showed an improved kinase selectivity that resulted from the space effect caused by the occupation of the rigid and bulky ruthenium complexes against the ATP-binding pocket [176]. Subsequently, the author further simplified the structure of Λ-FL172 by locating the metal atom at different positions within the active site to yield (R)-1, which possesses a higher affinity (IC₅₀ of 83 nM), but less kinase selectivity [177].

Aminopyrazole-based inhibitors

The aminopyrazole moiety is a common and vital kinase inhibitor scaffold, which functions as an ATP adenine mimetic agent with the capacity of initiating hydrogen bond interactions within the PAK kinase hinge region. In 2007, Pfizer disclosed numerous 5-substituted monocyclic aminopyrazoles as PAK inhibitors, which opened the gate to the development of PAK1 inhibitors based on the aminopyrimidine scaffold [178]. In 2013, other new aminopyrazole-based PAK1 inhibitors for cancer treatment and hyper-proliferative disorders were reported by Genentech. Among these derivatives, II-11 displayed the strongest PAK1 inhibitory potency with a Ki value of 11 nM and a cellular IC₅₀ of 43 nM [179]. PF-3758309, a pan-PAK inhibitor with bicyclic aminopyrazole, was identified as a potent, orally available PAK1 inhibitor with a Ki value of 14 nM [180]. Due to its prominent antitumor activity and pharmacokinetic profile in vivo, PF-3758309 has progressed to Phase I clinical trials as an anticancer agent in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors [181].

2-amino pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine-7(8H)-one-based inhibitors

The 2-amino pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-7(8H)-one derivatives were first identified as PAK1 inhibitors by Afraxis in 2007 [182]. Subsequently, numerous derivatives were reported in a series of patents [183-184]. These compounds were originally used for the treatment of various CNS disorders, with the scope of their use soon being expanded to oncology indications [185]. FRAX597, a noted potent PAK1 inhibitor with an IC₅₀ value of 7.7 nM, displayed a selectivity of PAK1 over PAK4 of > 130-fold, which presented a potent antiproliferatory capacity against NF2-deficient schwannoma cells and significant anti-tumor activity in an orthotopic model of NF2 [186]. FRAX486, a derivative of FRAX597, was originally designed to treat Fragile X syndrome and showed a capacity of inhibition of prostate stromal cell growth [187]. Additionally, by employing an unorthodox Low‑pKa polar moiety, G555 was documented as a potent, selective PAK1 inhibitor with an IC₅₀ value of 3.7 nM, making it a useful small-molecule probe for the elucidation of PAK1 unique biological functions [188].

Aminopyrimidine-based inhibitors

Other important PAK1 inhibitors were designed based on the aminopyrimidine core. Xu et al. developed 2-arylamino-4-aryl-pyrimidines as potent PAK1 inhibitors, with compound 12 showing potent inhibitory activity against PAK1, but the cell activity was not evaluated [189]. In order to improve the selectivity against PAK1, the 5-cyclopropyl-1H-pyrazole group was incorporated into the 4-site of aminopyrimidine core for targeting the ribose pocket to yield a series of potent, selective PAK1 inhibitors, including compounds 13, 14, and 15 [190-192]. To mitigate the toxicity, a pyridone side chain analog G-9791 was discovered as a selective PAK1 inhibitor [193]. Compound 17 was a potent PAK1 inhibitor discovered through a high-throughput virtual filtering strategy [194].

 Table 2 

PAK1 inhibitors

No.	Comd.	Structure	Classification	PAK1 inhibition activity	References
1	K-252a		ATP-competitive inhibitors	2.4 nM	[172]
2	KTD606		ATP-competitive inhibitors	4.0 nM	[174]
3	CEP1347		ATP-competitive inhibitors	2.5 nM	[174]
4	Staurosporine		ATP-competitive inhibitors	0.75 nM	[175]
5	Λ-FL172		ATP-competitive inhibitors	130 nM	[176]
6	(R-1)		ATP-competitive inhibitors	83 nM	[177]
7	II-11		ATP-competitive inhibitors	1.6 nM	[179]
8	PF-3758309		ATP-competitive inhibitors	14 nM	[180]
9	FRAX597		ATP-competitive inhibitors	7.7 nM	[186]
10	FRAX486		ATP-competitive inhibitors	8.3 nM	[187]
11	G‑5555		ATP-competitive inhibitors	3.7 nM	[188]
12	12		ATP-competitive inhibitors	65 nM	[189]
13	13		ATP-competitive inhibitors	5.0 nM	[190]
14	14		ATP-competitive inhibitors	5 nM	[191]
15	15		ATP-competitive inhibitors	288 nM	[192]
16	G-9791		ATP-competitive inhibitors	Ki=26 nM	[193]
17	17		ATP-competitive inhibitors	0.73 μM	[194]
18	OSU-03012		ATP-competitive inhibitors	1.03 μM	[195]
19	AK963		ATP-competitive inhibitors	-	[196]
20	ZMF-10		ATP-competitive inhibitors	194 nM	[197]
21	IPA-3		Allosteric inhibitors	2.5 μM	[198]
22	22		Allosteric inhibitors	5 nM	[199]
23	23		Allosteric inhibitors	18 nM	[199]
24	2-Mc-1,4-NHQ		Allosteric inhibitors	-	[200]

Other ATP-competitive inhibitors

OSU-03012, a previously characterized PDK1 inhibitor derived from celecoxib, displayed PAK1 inhibitory activity with an IC₅₀ value of 7.7 nM, which enabled motile NPA thyroid cancer cells to migrate [195]. AK963, a simple urea derivative, presented a PAK1 inhibitory potency and suppressed the proliferation of gastric cancer cells by downregulation of the PAK1-NF-κB-cyclinB1 pathway [196]. Recently we reported a novel PAK1 inhibitor, ZMF-10, which presented an IC₅₀ value of 174 nM with good selectivity. ZMF-10 induced significant ER-Stress, suppressed migration via FOXO3 activation, JNK1/2, ERK1/2 and AKT signaling inhibition [197].

Allosteric PAK1 inhibitors

IPA-3, the first reported PAK1 allosteric inhibitor, could covalently form a cysteine adduct with a surface-exposed cysteine residue in the N-terminal, regulatory portion of PAK1. It was reported that IPA-3 could induce cell death and affected cell adhesivity to fibronectin in human hematopoietic cells [198]. Compounds 22 and 23, both dibenzodiazepine derivatives, were discovered through a structure-based optimization strategy. These compounds bond to the PAK1 allosteric site, confirmed by crystallography [199]. Compound 23 is the most active allosteric inhibitor of PAK1 currently reported, which would contribute to investigation on the biological functions of the PAK1 kinase. Using an ELISA-based screening protocol, a series of naphtho(hydro)quinone-based small molecules that allosterically inhibit PAK activity was identified, and 2-Mc-1,4-NHQ showed the most potent inhibitory activity, with a Ki value of 1.98 μM, disrupting the Cdc42-PBD interactions [200].

Although many potent PAK1 inhibitors have been reported, including ATP competitive inhibitors and allosteric inhibitors, the development of PAK1 inhibitors still faces some challenges. First, the selectivity of these inhibitors needs to be further improved, especially for ATP competitive inhibitors. Additionally, the chemical structure diversity of these inhibitors has a large exploration space, and the druggability of most inhibitors needs to be further evaluated to ensure their clinical application. Therefore, more efforts should be devoted to the discovery of novel PAK1-targeted inhibitors.

Conclusions

Recently PAK1 has attracted wide attention due to its important role in regulating the skeleton and the movement of cancer cells. Furthermore, PAK1 has come to be seen as a cancer hallmark which regulates cytoskeleton dynamics, proliferation, metabolism reprogramming, mitosis, invasion, metastasis, tumor microenvironment response, cancer cell immune escape and cancer drug resistance. Due its huge impact on tumor survival, PAK1 has also emerged as a promising target for antitumor drug development.

PAK1 participates in almost every stage of a cancer cell and in every indispensable signal pathway, including EGFR/HER2/MAPK, Wnt/β-catenin, JNK/c-jun, NF-κB, cell cycle, apoptosis, autophagy and others, such as TGF-β and STAT5 signaling. The mutation, transmission or amplification of relating signaling pathway genes can affect the fate of cancer cells. PAK1 acts as a hub to intelligently and accurately connect these signals, and through the most appropriate regulation, to meet the comfort, metabolic stability, immune escape, survival and further development of cancer cells under different survival conditions. It acts like a core railway station, always ensuring the normal transportation capacity of cancer cells.

As PAK1 is a well-characterized promoter of the progression of cancer and a criminal in cancer development, and PAK1 inhibition is a good target for many cancer treatments. Given that the PAKs display distinct as well as overlapping functions, the pan-PAK inhibitors will inevitably cause severe side effects, although their tumor-killing effect may be stronger. Therefore, PAK1 targeting-inhibitors are a better option for the precise treatment of cancers. However, due to the high homology of the kinase domain, the design of a highly selective PAK1 inhibitor remains a significant challenge. To solve this issue, various discovery strategies could be utilized including high-throughput screening (HTS), virtual screening (VS), fragment-based drug design (FBDD), and structure-based drug design (SBDD), as well as drug repurposing. Allosteric inhibitors targeting PAK1 display superiority in selectivity compared with the pan-kinase inhibitors. Additionally, proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) is an emerging novel technology that takes advantage of a small molecule to control intracellular protein levels through recruiting target proteins to the ubiquitin/proteasome system for selective degradation. We predict that the PAK1 PROTAC degradation agent will be one of the preferred strategies to achieve selectivity. Other strategies include bivalent inhibitors and covalent inhibitors. Considering that PAK1 plays an important role in the network of cancer-dependent proteins, selective co-regulation of these proteins is also a good solution. And Dual inhibitors do have shown significant advantages in overcoming drug resistance, with the potential targets, including BRD4/PAK1, EGFR/PAK1, HSP90/PAK1, and CDKs/PAK1. Targeting PAK1 with small molecules holds promise as a viable therapeutic strategy for cancers. However, the road toward market approval remains a long one, and this effort will require interdisciplinary collaboration. The discovery of potent and specific PAK1 inhibitors with high isoform selectivity will fill roles in multiple applications as useful pharmacological probes for elucidating PAK1 biological functions and in the development of medications to benefit patients in the near future.

In addition, considering the role of PAK in tumor immune escape, the selective use of PAK1 inhibitors or modulators (such as siRNAs, miRNAs, LncRNAs or antibody drugs) in immunotherapy may also be a candidate for adjuvant cancer treatment. Moreover, the dual role of PAK1 in autophagy makes its regulators combined with autophagy-regulating drugs may solve the problem of drug resistance induced by protective autophagy in chemotherapy. Overall, PAK1 has become a hallmarker and therapeutic target for a variety of cancers. By exploring the complex regulatory molecular mechanism of PAK1 in cancer progression and the current situation of small molecule drug development, it might be helpful to develop better PAK1 anticancer drugs and novel PAK1-related cancer treatment strategies.

Abbreviations

PAK1, p21-Activated kinase 1; RAC1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; CDC42, Cell division control protein 42 homolog; MORC2, microrchidia CW-type zinc finger 2; PBD, p21-binding domain; AID, autoinhibitory domain; PIK3CA, Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha isoform; IL-1α, Interleukin-1 alpha; IL-6, Interleukin-6; IL-18, Interleukin-18; HIFs, hypoxia-inducible factors; HER2, Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2; EGFR, Epidermal growth factor receptor; MAPK, Mitogen-activated protein kinase; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transformation; LIMK, LIM-kinase; TCoB, tubulin cofactor B; mTOR, Serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR; miRNAs, microRNAs; LncRNA, long none-coding RNA; JAK2, Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2; PPI, protein-protein interaction; GSK-3β, Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta; MYC, Myc proto-oncogene protein; MMP, Matrix metalloproteinase; PPARγ, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; PIP2, phoshatidylinoside 4,5 bisphosphate; PIP3, phoshatidylinoside 3,4,5-triphosphate; MPNSTs, Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors; GHRH-R, hormone-releasing hormone receptor; DLC1, Dynein light chain 1; NIK, NF-κB interacting kinase; CDKs, cyclin-dependent kinases; PLKs, Polo-like kinases; Arpc1b, actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B; CHK2, checkpoint kinase 2; HTS, high-throughput screening; VS, virtual screening; FBDD, fragment-based drug design; SBDD, structure-based drug design; PROTAC, proteolysis targeting chimera; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; RUFY3, FYVE domain containing 3; ILK, Integrin-linked kinase; PDA, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PSCs, pancreatic stellate cells; PGM, Phosphoglucomutase 1; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; HLX, H2.0-like homeobox; ELP3, elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 3; MCAK, mitotic centromere-associated kinesin; GBM, glioblastoma; TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; TGFBR1, transforming growth factor-β receptor type 1; BCR-ABL, BCR-ABL fusion gene.

Acknowledgements

We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. We are also grateful to the assistance with the proper usage of scientific English provided by Dr. Muhammad Shahid Riaz Rajoka (Shenzhen University). This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81803365, 81973293); The National Key R & D Program of China (2018ZX09735005, 2017YFA0503900); Post-Doctor Research Project (2018M643510, 2019M650213) and Post-Doctor Research Project of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Grant No. 2018HXBH065). Foundation Committee of basic and applied basic research of Guangdong Province (2019B1515120029, 2019A1515110482) and Shenzhen Natural Science Foundation (JCYJ20190808171803553). Figures are created with BioRender.com and Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com) under CC BY 3.0 license, we thank these professional website and we appreciate their generosity and kindness.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Martin GA, Bollag G, McCormick F, Abo A. A novel serine kinase activated by rac1/cdc42hs-dependent autophosphorylation is related to pak65 and ste20. EMBO J. 1995;14:1970-8

2. Rane CK, Minden A. P21 activated kinase signaling in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019;54:40-9

3. Kumar R, Sanawar R, Li X, Li F. Structure, biochemistry, and biology of pak kinases. Gene. 2017;605:20-31

4. Hofmann C, Shepelev M, Chernoff J. The genetics of pak. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:4343-54

5. Kelly ML, Astsaturov A, Chernoff J. Role of p21-activated kinases in cardiovascular development and function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:4223-8

6. Li T, Li Y, Liu T, Hu B, Li J, Liu C. et al. Mitochondrial pak6 inhibits prostate cancer cell apoptosis via the pak6-sirt4-ant2 complex. Theranostics. 2020;10:2571-86

7. Radu M, Semenova G, Kosoff R, Chernoff J. Pak signalling during the development and progression of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:13-25

8. Ha BH, Morse EM, Turk BE, Boggon TJ. Signaling, regulation, and specificity of the type ii p21-activated kinases. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:12975-83

9. Ong CC, Gierke S, Pitt C, Sagolla M, Cheng CK, Zhou W. et al. Small molecule inhibition of group i p21-activated kinases in breast cancer induces apoptosis and potentiates the activity of microtubule stabilizing agents. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:59

10. Song B, Wang W, Zheng Y, Yang J, Xu Z. P21-activated kinase 1 and 4 were associated with colorectal cancer metastasis and infiltration. J Surg Res. 2015;196:130-5

11. Xu J, Liu H, Chen L, Wang S, Zhou L, Yun X. et al. Hepatitis b virus x protein confers resistance of hepatoma cells to anoikis by up-regulating and activating p21-activated kinase 1. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:199-212 e4

12. Fang F, Pan J, Li YP, Li G, Xu LX, Su GH. et al. P21-activated kinase 1 (pak1) expression correlates with prognosis in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:27422-9

13. Kawahara M, Pandolfi A, Bartholdy B, Barreyro L, Will B, Roth M. et al. H2.0-like homeobox regulates early hematopoiesis and promotes acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer cell. 2012;22:194-208

14. Pandolfi A, Stanley RF, Yu Y, Bartholdy B, Pendurti G, Gritsman K. et al. Pak1 is a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2015;126:1118-27

15. Advani SJ, Camargo MF, Seguin L, Mielgo A, Anand S, Hicks AM. et al. Kinase-independent role for craf-driving tumour radioresistance via chk2. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8154

16. Huynh N, Wang K, Yim M, Dumesny CJ, Sandrin MS, Baldwin GS. et al. Depletion of p21-activated kinase 1 up-regulates the immune system of apc(14/+) mice and inhibits intestinal tumorigenesis. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:431

17. Crawford JJ, Hoeflich KP, Rudolph J. P21-activated kinase inhibitors: A patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2012;22:293-310

18. Manser E, Leung T, Salihuddin H, Zhao ZS, Lim L. A brain serine/threonine protein kinase activated by cdc42 and rac1. Nature. 1994;367:40-6

19. Knaus UG, Bokoch GM. The p21rac/cdc42-activated kinases (paks). Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1998;30:857-62

20. Parrini MC, Lei M, Harrison SC, Mayer BJ. Pak1 kinase homodimers are autoinhibited in trans and dissociated upon activation by cdc42 and rac1. Mol Cell. 2002;9:73-83

21. Pirruccello M, Sondermann H, Pelton JG, Pellicena P, Hoelz A, Chernoff J. et al. A dimeric kinase assembly underlying autophosphorylation in the p21 activated kinases. J Mol Biol. 2006;361:312-26

22. Wang J, Wu JW, Wang ZX. Structural insights into the autoactivation mechanism of p21-activated protein kinase. Structure. 2011;19:1752-61

23. Lei M, Lu W, Meng W, Parrini MC, Eck MJ, Mayer BJ. et al. Structure of pak1 in an autoinhibited conformation reveals a multistage activation switch. Cell. 2000;102:387-97

24. Buchwald G, Hostinova E, Rudolph MG, Kraemer A, Sickmann A, Meyer HE. et al. Conformational switch and role of phosphorylation in pak activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:5179-89

25. Baskaran Y, Ng YW, Selamat W, Ling FT, Manser E. Group i and ii mammalian paks have different modes of activation by cdc42. EMBO Rep. 2012;13:653-9

26. Chow HY, Dong B, Valencia CA, Zeng CT, Koch JN, Prudnikova TY. et al. Group i paks are essential for epithelial- mesenchymal transition in an apc-driven model of colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3473

27. Mertins P, Mani DR, Ruggles KV, Gillette MA, Clauser KR, Wang P. et al. Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer. Nature. 2016;534:55-62

28. Loibl S, Treue D, Budczies J, Weber K, Stenzinger A, Schmitt WD. et al. Mutational diversity and therapy response in breast cancer: A sequencing analysis in the neoadjuvant geparsepto trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:3986-95

29. Zhang S, Han J, Sells MA, Chernoff J, Knaus UG, Ulevitch RJ. et al. Rho family gtpases regulate p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase through the downstream mediator pak1. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:23934-6

30. Sells MA, Knaus UG, Bagrodia S, Ambrose DM, Bokoch GM, Chernoff J. Human p21-activated kinase (pak1) regulates actin organization in mammalian cells. Curr Biol. 1997;7:202-10

31. Adam L, Vadlamudi R, Kondapaka SB, Chernoff J, Mendelsohn J, Kumar R. Heregulin regulates cytoskeletal reorganization and cell migration through the p21-activated kinase-1 via phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:28238-46

32. Mira JP, Benard V, Groffen J, Sanders LC, Knaus UG. Endogenous, hyperactive rac3 controls proliferation of breast cancer cells by a p21-activated kinase-dependent pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:185-9

33. Williams KC, Cepeda MA, Javed S, Searle K, Parkins KM, Makela AV. et al. Invadopodia are chemosensing protrusions that guide cancer cell extravasation to promote brain tropism in metastasis. Oncogene. 2019;38:3598-615

34. Jagadeeshan S, Subramanian A, Tentu S, Beesetti S, Singhal M, Raghavan S. et al. P21-activated kinase 1 (pak1) signaling influences therapeutic outcome in pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1546-56

35. Tabassum DP, Polyak K. Tumorigenesis: It takes a village. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:473-83

36. Parsons HA, Rhoades J, Reed SC, Gydush G, Ram P, Exman P. et al. Sensitive detection of minimal residual disease in patients treated for early-stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:2556-64

37. Arias-Romero LE, Villamar-Cruz O, Huang M, Hoeflich KP, Chernoff J. Pak1 kinase links erbb2 to beta-catenin in transformation of breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3671-82

38. Omofuma OO, Turner DP, Peterson LL, Merchant AT, Zhang J, Steck SE. Dietary advanced glycation end-products (age) and risk of breast cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial (plco). Cancer Prev Res. 2020;13:601-10

39. Mortazavi F, Lu J, Phan R, Lewis M, Trinidad K, Aljilani A. et al. Significance of kras/pak1/crk pathway in non-small cell lung cancer oncogenesis. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:381

40. Zhang N, Li X, Liu X, Cao Y, Chen D, Liu X. et al. P21-activated kinase 1 activity is required for histone h3 ser(10) phosphorylation and chromatin condensation in mouse oocyte meiosis. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017;29:1287-96

41. Sauzeau V, Berenjeno IM, Citterio C, Bustelo XR. A transcriptional cross-talk between rhoa and c-myc inhibits the rhoa/rock-dependent cytoskeleton. Oncogene. 2010;29:3781-92

42. Li DQ, Nair SS, Ohshiro K, Kumar A, Nair VS, Pakala SB. et al. Morc2 signaling integrates phosphorylation-dependent, atpase-coupled chromatin remodeling during the DNA damage response. Cell Rep. 2012;2:1657-69

43. Wang G, Song Y, Liu T, Wang C, Zhang Q, Liu F. et al. Pak1-mediated morc2 phosphorylation promotes gastric tumorigenesis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:9877-86

44. Dammann K, Khare V, Gasche C. Tracing paks from gi inflammation to cancer. Gut. 2014;63:1173-84

45. Rankin EB, Giaccia AJ. Hypoxic control of metastasis. Science. 2016;352:175-80

46. Liu KH, Huynh N, Patel O, Shulkes A, Baldwin G, He H. P21-activated kinase 1 promotes colorectal cancer survival by up-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. Cancer Lett. 2013;340:22-9

47. Alavi A, Hood JD, Frausto R, Stupack DG, Cheresh DA. Role of raf in vascular protection from distinct apoptotic stimuli. Science. 2003;301:94-6

48. Gonzalez-Villasana V, Fuentes-Mattei E, Ivan C, Dalton HJ, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Fernandez-de Thomas RJ. et al. Rac1/pak1/p38/mmp-2 axis regulates angiogenesis in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2127-37

49. Pi J, Liu J, Zhuang T, Zhang L, Sun H, Chen X. et al. Elevated expression of mir302-367 in endothelial cells inhibits developmental angiogenesis via cdc42/ccnd1 mediated signaling pathways. Theranostics. 2018;8:1511-26

50. Follain G, Herrmann D, Harlepp S, Hyenne V, Osmani N, Warren SC. et al. Fluids and their mechanics in tumour transit: Shaping metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:107-24

51. Daub H, Gevaert K, Vandekerckhove J, Sobel A, Hall A. Rac/cdc42 and p65pak regulate the microtubule-destabilizing protein stathmin through phosphorylation at serine 16. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:1677-80

52. Vadlamudi RK, Li F, Adam L, Nguyen D, Ohta Y, Stossel TP. et al. Filamin is essential in actin cytoskeletal assembly mediated by p21-activated kinase 1. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:681-90

53. Edwards DC, Sanders LC, Bokoch GM, Gill GN. Activation of lim-kinase by pak1 couples rac/cdc42 gtpase signalling to actin cytoskeletal dynamics. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:253-9

54. Vadlamudi RK, Li F, Barnes CJ, Bagheri-Yarmand R, Kumar R. P41-arc subunit of human arp2/3 complex is a p21-activated kinase-1-interacting substrate. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:154-60

55. Vadlamudi RK, Barnes CJ, Rayala S, Li F, Balasenthil S, Marcus S. et al. P21-activated kinase 1 regulates microtubule dynamics by phosphorylating tubulin cofactor b. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:3726-36

56. Wang G, Zhang Q, Song Y, Wang X, Guo Q, Zhang J. et al. Pak1 regulates rufy3-mediated gastric cancer cell migration and invasion. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1682

57. Acconcia F, Barnes CJ, Singh RR, Talukder AH, Kumar R. Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of nuclear localization and functions of integrin-linked kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:6782-7

58. Hamidi H, Ivaska J. Every step of the way: Integrins in cancer progression and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:533-48

59. Liu F, Cheng Z, Li X, Li Y, Zhang H, Li J. et al. A novel pak1/atf2/mir-132 signaling axis is involved in the hematogenous metastasis of gastric cancer cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;8:370-82

60. He H, Huynh N, Liu KH, Malcontenti-Wilson C, Zhu J, Christophi C. et al. P-21 activated kinase 1 knockdown inhibits beta-catenin signalling and blocks colorectal cancer growth. Cancer Lett. 2012;317:65-71

61. Zhu Y, Liu H, Xu L, An H, Liu W, Liu Y. et al. P21-activated kinase 1 determines stem-like phenotype and sunitinib resistance via nf-kappab/il-6 activation in renal cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1637

62. Wang K, Zhan Y, Huynh N, Dumesny C, Wang X, Asadi K. et al. Inhibition of pak1 suppresses pancreatic cancer by stimulation of anti-tumour immunity through down-regulation of pd-l1. Cancer Lett. 2020;472:8-18

63. Nukada Y, Okamoto N, Konakahara S, Tezuka K, Ohashi K, Mizuno K. et al. Ailim/icos-mediated elongation of activated t cells is regulated by both the pi3-kinase/akt and rho family cascade. Int Immunol. 2006;18:1815-24

64. Ishida H, Li K, Yi M, Lemon SM. P21-activated kinase 1 is activated through the mammalian target of rapamycin/p70 s6 kinase pathway and regulates the replication of hepatitis c virus in human hepatoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:11836-48

65. Gururaj A, Barnes CJ, Vadlamudi RK, Kumar R. Regulation of phosphoglucomutase 1 phosphorylation and activity by a signaling kinase. Oncogene. 2004;23:8118-27

66. Nandy SB, Orozco A, Lopez-Valdez R, Roberts R, Subramani R, Arumugam A. et al. Glucose insult elicits hyperactivation of cancer stem cells through mir-424-cdc42-prdm14 signalling axis. Br J Cancer. 2017;117:1665-75

67. Vasan N, Baselga J, Hyman DM. A view on drug resistance in cancer. Nature. 2019;575:299-309

68. Ito M, Codony-Servat C, Karachaliou N, Rosell R. Targeting pkciota-pak1 in egfr-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8:667-73

69. Wu DW, Wu TC, Chen CY, Lee H. Pak1 is a novel therapeutic target in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant lung adenocarcinoma activated by the pi3k/akt signaling regardless of egfr mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5370-82

70. Flis S, Bratek E, Chojnacki T, Piskorek M, Skorski T. Simultaneous inhibition of bcr-abl1 tyrosine kinase and pak1/2 serine/threonine kinase exerts synergistic effect against chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Cancers. 2019 11

71. Wang K, Baldwin GS, Nikfarjam M, He H. Antitumor effects of all-trans retinoic acid and its synergism with gemcitabine are associated with downregulation of p21-activated kinases in pancreatic cancer. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019;316:G632-G40

72. Chen MJ, Wu DW, Wang YC, Chen CY, Lee H. Pak1 confers chemoresistance and poor outcome in non-small cell lung cancer via beta-catenin-mediated stemness. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34933

73. Babagana M, Johnson S, Slabodkin H, Bshara W, Morrison C, Kandel ES. P21-activated kinase 1 regulates resistance to braf inhibition in human cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56:1515-25

74. Gonzalez N, Cardama GA, Comin MJ, Segatori VI, Pifano M, Alonso DF. et al. Pharmacological inhibition of rac1-pak1 axis restores tamoxifen sensitivity in human resistant breast cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2017;30:154-61

75. Lu H, Liu S, Zhang G, Bin W, Zhu Y, Frederick DT. et al. Pak signalling drives acquired drug resistance to mapk inhibitors in braf-mutant melanomas. Nature. 2017;550:133-6

76. Zhou W, Jubb AM, Lyle K, Xiao Q, Ong CC, Desai R. et al. Pak1 mediates pancreatic cancer cell migration and resistance to met inhibition. J Pathol. 2014;234:502-13.76

77. Walsh K, McKinney MS, Love C, Liu Q, Fan A, Patel A. et al. Pak1 mediates resistance to pi3k inhibition in lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1106-15

78. Bertoli G, Cava C, Castiglioni I. Micrornas: New biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, therapy prediction and therapeutic tools for breast cancer. Theranostics. 2015;5:1122-43

79. Tu J, Zhao Z, Xu M, Chen M, Weng Q, Ji J. Linc00460 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma development through sponging mir-485-5p to up-regulate pak1. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118:109213

80. Zhu M, Zhang C, Chen D, Chen S, Zheng H. Lncrna malat1 potentiates the progression of tongue squamous cell carcinoma through regulating mir-140-5p-pak1 pathway. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:1365-77

81. Li L, Wang S, Li H, Wan J, Zhou Q, Zhou Y. et al. Microrna-96 protects pancreatic beta-cell function by targeting pak1 in gestational diabetes mellitus. Biofactors. 2018;44:539-47

82. Jeong D, Ham J, Park S, Lee S, Lee H, Kang HS. et al. Microrna-7-5p mediates the signaling of hepatocyte growth factor to suppress oncogenes in the mcf-10a mammary epithelial cell. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15425

83. Zhan MN, Yu XT, Tang J, Zhou CX, Wang CL, Yin QQ. et al. Microrna-494 inhibits breast cancer progression by directly targeting pak1. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2529

84. Zhou Y, Zhao RH, Tseng KF, Li KP, Lu ZG, Liu Y. et al. Sirolimus induces apoptosis and reverses multidrug resistance in human osteosarcoma cells in vitro via increasing microrna-34b expression. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2016;37:519-29

85. Kou B, Gao Y, Du C, Shi Q, Xu S, Wang CQ. et al. Mir-145 inhibits invasion of bladder cancer cells by targeting pak1. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:846-54

86. Knaus UG, Morris S, Dong HJ, Chernoff J, Bokoch GM. Regulation of human leukocyte p21-activated kinases through g protein-coupled receptors. Science. 1995;269:221-3

87. Xu T, He BS, Pan B, Pan YQ, Sun HL, Liu XX. et al. Mir-142-3p functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting rac1/pak1 pathway in breast cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:4928-40

88. Yang J, Qiu Q, Qian X, Yi J, Jiao Y, Yu M. et al. Long noncoding rna lcat1 functions as a cerna to regulate rac1 function by sponging mir-4715-5p in lung cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:171

89. He PY, Yip WK, Chai BL, Chai BY, Jabar MF, Dusa N. et al. Inhibition of cell migration and invasion by mir29a3p in a colorectal cancer cell line through suppression of cdc42bpa mrna expression. Oncol Rep. 2017;38:3554-66

90. Zhou Y, Fan RG, Qin CL, Jia J, Wu XD, Zha WZ. Lncrna-h19 activates cdc42/pak1 pathway to promote cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting mir-15b in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genomics. 2019;111:1862-72

91. Dong Z, Yu C, Rezhiya K, Gulijiahan A, Wang X. Downregulation of mir-146a promotes tumorigenesis of cervical cancer stem cells via vegf/cdc42/pak1 signaling pathway. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47:3711-9

92. Li X, Zhu J, Liu Y, Duan C, Chang R, Zhang C. Microrna-331-3p inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting erbb2 and vav2 through the rac1/pak1/beta-catenin axis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:1883-96

93. Tian Z, Wang R, Zhang X, Deng B, Mi C, Liang T. et al. Benzo[a]pyrene-7, 8-diol-9, 10-epoxide suppresses the migration and invasion of human extravillous trophoblast swan 71 cells due to the inhibited filopodia formation and down-regulated pi3k/akt/cdc42/pak1 pathway mediated by the increased mir-194-3p. Toxicol Sci. 2018;166:25-38

94. Deguchi A, Miyoshi H, Kojima Y, Okawa K, Aoki M, Taketo MM. Lkb1 suppresses p21-activated kinase-1 (pak1) by phosphorylation of thr109 in the p21-binding domain. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:18283-90

95. Das S, Nair RS, Mishra R, Sondarva G, Viswakarma N, Abdelkarim H. et al. Mixed lineage kinase 3 promotes breast tumorigenesis via phosphorylation and activation of p21-activated kinase 1. Oncogene. 2019;38:3569-84

96. Chen X, Cates JMM, Du YC, Jain A, Jung SY, Li XN. et al. Mislocalized cytoplasmic p27 activates pak1-mediated metastasis and is a prognostic factor in osteosarcoma. Mol Oncol. 2020;14:846-64

97. Wary KK. Signaling through raf-1 in the neovasculature and target validation by nanoparticles. Mol Cancer. 2003;2:27

98. Kim YB, Shin YJ, Roy A, Kim JH. The role of the pleckstrin homology domain-containing protein ckip-1 in activation of p21-activated kinase 1 (pak1). J Biol Chem. 2015;290:21076-85

99. Rider L, Shatrova A, Feener EP, Webb L, Diakonova M. Jak2 tyrosine kinase phosphorylates pak1 and regulates pak1 activity and functions. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:30985-96

100. King CC, Gardiner EM, Zenke FT, Bohl BP, Newton AC, Hemmings BA. et al. P21-activated kinase (pak1) is phosphorylated and activated by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 (pdk1). J Biol Chem. 2000;275:41201-9

101. Feng X, Zhang H, Meng L, Song H, Zhou Q, Qu C. et al. Hypoxia-induced acetylation of pak1 enhances autophagy and promotes brain tumorigenesis via phosphorylating atg5. Autophagy. 2020:1-20

102. Ito M, Codony-Servat C, Codony-Servat J, Llige D, Chaib I, Sun X. et al. Targeting pkciota-pak1 signaling pathways in egfr and kras mutant adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Commun Signal. 2019;17:137

103. Meyer Zum Buschenfelde U, Brandenstein LI, von Elsner L, Flato K, Holling T, Zenker M. et al. Rit1 controls actin dynamics via complex formation with rac1/cdc42 and pak1. PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007370

104. Xia P, Huang M, Zhang Y, Xiong X, Yan M, Xiong X. et al. Nck1 promotes the angiogenesis of cervical squamous carcinoma via rac1/pak1/mmp2 signal pathway. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152:387-95

105. Wang J, Hirose H, Du G, Chong K, Kiyohara E, Witz IP. et al. P-rex1 amplification promotes progression of cutaneous melanoma via the pak1/p38/mmp-2 pathway. Cancer Lett. 2017;407:66-75

106. Chu Y, Elrod N, Wang C, Li L, Chen T, Routh A. et al. Nudt21 regulates the alternative polyadenylation of pak1 and is predictive in the prognosis of glioblastoma patients. Oncogene. 2019;38:4154-68

107. Kissil JL, Wilker EW, Johnson KC, Eckman MS, Yaffe MB, Jacks T. Merlin, the product of the nf2 tumor suppressor gene, is an inhibitor of the p21-activated kinase, pak1. Mol Cell. 2003;12:841-9

108. Alahari SK, Reddig PJ, Juliano RL. The integrin-binding protein nischarin regulates cell migration by inhibiting pak. EMBO J. 2004;23:2777-88

109. Eswaran J, Li DQ, Shah A, Kumar R. Molecular pathways: Targeting p21-activated kinase 1 signaling in cancer-opportunities, challenges, and limitations. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3743-9

110. Satterfield L, Shuck R, Kurenbekova L, Allen-Rhoades W, Edwards D, Huang S. et al. Mir-130b directly targets arhgap1 to drive activation of a metastatic cdc42-pak1-ap1 positive feedback loop in ewing sarcoma. Int J Cancer. 2017;141:2062-75

111. Ito H, Tsunoda T, Riku M, Inaguma S, Inoko A, Murakami H. et al. Indispensable role of stil in the regulation of cancer cell motility through the lamellipodial accumulation of arhgef7-pak1 complex. Oncogene. 2020;39:1931-43

112. Oladimeji P, Skerl R, Rusch C, Diakonova M. Synergistic activation of eralpha by estrogen and prolactin in breast cancer cells requires tyrosyl phosphorylation of pak1. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2600-11

113. McCarty SK, Saji M, Zhang X, Knippler CM, Kirschner LS, Fernandez S. et al. Braf activates and physically interacts with pak to regulate cell motility. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014;21:865-77

114. Bagheri-Yarmand R, Mandal M, Taludker AH, Wang RA, Vadlamudi RK, Kung HJ. et al. Etk/bmx tyrosine kinase activates pak1 and regulates tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:29403-9

115. Cai D, Iyer A, Felekkis KN, Near RI, Luo Z, Chernoff J. et al. And-34/bcar3, a gdp exchange factor whose overexpression confers antiestrogen resistance, activates rac, pak1, and the cyclin d1 promoter. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6802-8

116. Liu X, Si W, Liu X, He L, Ren J, Yang Z. et al. Jmjd6 promotes melanoma carcinogenesis through regulation of the alternative splicing of pak1, a key mapk signaling component. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:175

117. Wei S, Dai M, Liu Z, Ma Y, Shang H, Cao Y. et al. The guanine nucleotide exchange factor net1 facilitates the specification of dorsal cell fates in zebrafish embryos by promoting maternal beta-catenin activation. Cell Res. 2017;27:202-25

118. Yan KS, Janda CY, Chang J, Zheng GXY, Larkin KA, Luca VC. et al. Non-equivalence of wnt and r-spondin ligands during lgr5(+) intestinal stem-cell self-renewal. Nature. 2017;545:238-42

119. Hoffmeyer K, Raggioli A, Rudloff S, Anton R, Hierholzer A, Del Valle I. et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling regulates telomerase in stem cells and cancer cells. Science. 2012;336:1549-54

120. Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169:985-99

121. Zhao B, Qi Z, Li Y, Wang C, Fu W, Chen YG. The non-muscle-myosin-ii heavy chain myh9 mediates colitis-induced epithelium injury by restricting lgr5+ stem cells. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7166

122. Manning BD, Toker A. Akt/pkb signaling: Navigating the network. Cell. 2017;169:381-405

123. Redelman-Sidi G, Binyamin A, Gaeta I, Palm W, Thompson CB, Romesser PB. et al. The canonical wnt pathway drives macropinocytosis in cancer. Cell Res. 2018;78:4658-70

124. Chen MJ, Wu DW, Wang YC, Chen CY, Lee H. Corrigendum: Pak1 confers chemoresistance and poor outcome in non-small cell lung cancer via beta-catenin-mediated stemness. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38463

125. Arteaga CL, Engelman JA. Erbb receptors: From oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:282-303

126. Hynes NE, MacDonald G. Erbb receptors and signaling pathways in cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:177-84

127. Tebbutt N, Pedersen MW, Johns TG. Targeting the erbb family in cancer: Couples therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:663-73

128. Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2787-99

129. Fruman DA, Chiu H, Hopkins BD, Bagrodia S, Cantley LC, Abraham RT. The pi3k pathway in human disease. Cell. 2017;170:605-35

130. Higuchi M, Onishi K, Kikuchi C, Gotoh Y. Scaffolding function of pak in the pdk1-akt pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:1356-64

131. Rommel C, Clarke BA, Zimmermann S, Nunez L, Rossman R, Reid K. et al. Differentiation stage-specific inhibition of the raf-mek-erk pathway by akt. Science. 1999;286:1738-41

132. Zimmermann S, Moelling K. Phosphorylation and regulation of raf by akt (protein kinase b). Science. 1999;286:1741-4

133. El-Baba C, Mahadevan V, Fahlbusch FB, Mohan SS, Rau TT, Gali-Muhtasib H. et al. Thymoquinone-induced conformational changes of pak1 interrupt prosurvival mek-erk signaling in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:201

134. Kelly ML, Astsaturov A, Rhodes J, Chernoff J. A pak1/erk signaling module acts through gata6 to regulate cardiovascular development in zebrafish. Dev Cell. 2014;29:350-9

135. Joneson T, McDonough M, Bar-Sagi D, Van Aelst L. Rac regulation of actin polymerization and proliferation by a pathway distinct from jun kinase. Science. 1996;274:1374-6

136. Dou Q, Chen HN, Wang K, Yuan K, Lei Y, Li K. et al. Ivermectin induces cytostatic autophagy by blocking the pak1/akt axis in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4457-69

137. Semenova G, Stepanova DS, Dubyk C, Handorf E, Deyev SM, Lazar AJ. et al. Targeting group i p21-activated kinases to control malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor growth and metastasis. Oncogene. 2017;36:5421-31

138. Karin M, Greten FR. Nf-kappab: Linking inflammation and immunity to cancer development and progression. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:749-59

139. Taniguchi K, Karin M. Nf-kappab, inflammation, immunity and cancer: Coming of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:309-24

140. Singh R, Letai A, Sarosiek K. Regulation of apoptosis in health and disease: The balancing act of bcl-2 family proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:175-93

141. Gan J, Ke X, Jiang J, Dong H, Yao Z, Lin Y. et al. Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor antagonists inhibit human gastric cancer through downregulation of pak1-stat3/nf-kappab signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:14745-50

142. Jin S, Zhuo Y, Guo W, Field J. P21-activated kinase 1 (pak1)-dependent phosphorylation of raf-1 regulates its mitochondrial localization, phosphorylation of bad, and bcl-2 association. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:24698-705

143. Ye DZ, Jin S, Zhuo Y, Field J. P21-activated kinase 1 (pak1) phosphorylates bad directly at serine 111 in vitro and indirectly through raf-1 at serine 112. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27637

144. Song C, Wen W, Rayala SK, Chen M, Ma J, Zhang M. et al. Serine 88 phosphorylation of the 8-kda dynein light chain 1 is a molecular switch for its dimerization status and functions. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:4004-13

145. Otto T, Sicinski P. Cell cycle proteins as promising targets in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:93-115

146. Zhao ZS, Lim JP, Ng YW, Lim L, Manser E. The git-associated kinase pak targets to the centrosome and regulates aurora-a. Mol Cell. 2005;20:237-49

147. Korobeynikov V, Borakove M, Feng Y, Wuest WM, Koval AB, Nikonova AS. et al. Combined inhibition of aurora a and p21-activated kinase 1 as a new treatment strategy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;177:369-82

148. Molli PR, Li DQ, Bagheri-Yarmand R, Pakala SB, Katayama H, Sen S. et al. Arpc1b, a centrosomal protein, is both an activator and substrate of aurora a. J Cell Biol. 2010;190:101-14

149. Pakala SB, Nair VS, Reddy SD, Kumar R. Signaling-dependent phosphorylation of mitotic centromere-associated kinesin regulates microtubule depolymerization and its centrosomal localization. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:40560-9

150. Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. Purification and molecular cloning of plx1, a cdc25-regulatory kinase from xenopus egg extracts. Science. 1996;273:1377-80

151. Maroto B, Ye MB, von Lohneysen K, Schnelzer A, Knaus UG. P21-activated kinase is required for mitotic progression and regulates plk1. Oncogene. 2008;27:4900-8

152. Liu F, Li X, Wang C, Cai X, Du Z, Xu H. et al. Downregulation of p21-activated kinase-1 inhibits the growth of gastric cancer cells involving cyclin b1. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:2511-9

153. Herold S, Herkert B, Eilers M. Facilitating replication under stress: An oncogenic function of myc?. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:441-4

154. Li F, Adam L, Vadlamudi RK, Zhou H, Sen S, Chernoff J. et al. P21-activated kinase 1 interacts with and phosphorylates histone h3 in breast cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:767-73

155. Qian Y, Wu X, Wang H, Hou G, Han X, Song W. Pak1 silencing is synthetic lethal with cdk4/6 inhibition in gastric cancer cells via regulating pdk1 expression. Hum Cell. 2020;33:377-85

156. Yao D, Pan D, Zhen Y, Huang J, Wang J, Zhang J. et al. Ferulin c triggers potent pak1 and p21-mediated anti-tumor effects in breast cancer by inhibiting tubulin polymerization in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacol Res. 2020;152:104605

157. Wang K, Gao W, Dou Q, Chen H, Li Q, Nice EC. et al. Ivermectin induces pak1-mediated cytostatic autophagy in breast cancer. Autophagy. 2016;12:2498-9

158. Xia L, Lin J, Su J, Oyang L, Wang H, Tan S. et al. Diallyl disulfide inhibits colon cancer metastasis by suppressing rac1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:5713-28

159. Liang J, Han B, Zhang Y, Yue Q. Numb inhibits cell proliferation, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition through pak1/beta-catenin signaling pathway in ovarian cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:3223-33

160. Cao F, Yin LX. Pak1 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma by facilitating emt via directly up-regulating snail. Genomics. 2020;112:694-702

161. Kim E, Youn H, Kwon T, Son B, Kang J, Yang HJ. et al. Pak1 tyrosine phosphorylation is required to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition and radioresistance in lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5520-31

162. Williams ED, Gao D, Redfern A, Thompson EW. Controversies around epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:716-32

163. Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:178-96

164. Batlle E, Massague J. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling in immunity and cancer. Immunity. 2019;50:924-40

165. Goc A, Al-Azayzih A, Abdalla M, Al-Husein B, Kavuri S, Lee J. et al. P21 activated kinase-1 (pak1) promotes prostate tumor growth and microinvasion via inhibition of transforming growth factor beta expression and enhanced matrix metalloproteinase 9 secretion. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:3025-35

166. Al-Azayzih A, Gao F, Somanath PR. P21 activated kinase-1 mediates transforming growth factor beta1-induced prostate cancer cell epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853:1229-39

167. Kim W, Kim E, Lee S, Kim D, Chun J, Park KH. et al. Tfap2c-mediated upregulation of tgfbr1 promotes lung tumorigenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Exp Mol Med. 2016;48:e273

168. Vadlamudi RK, Manavathi B, Singh RR, Nguyen D, Li F, Kumar R. An essential role of pak1 phosphorylation of sharp in notch signaling. Oncogene. 2005;24:4591-6

169. Chakraborty S, Njah K, Pobbati AV, Lim YB, Raju A, Lakshmanan M. et al. Agrin as a mechanotransduction signal regulating yap through the hippo pathway. Cell Rep. 2017;18:2464-79

170. Chatterjee A, Ghosh J, Ramdas B, Mali RS, Martin H, Kobayashi M. et al. Regulation of stat5 by fak and pak1 in oncogenic flt3- and kit-driven leukemogenesis. Cell Rep. 2014;9:1333-48

171. Yuanxin Y, Yanhong Z, Qin Z, Sishi T, Yang D, Yi Z. et al. Pak1 gene functioned differentially in different bcr-abl subtypes in leukemiagenesis and treatment response through stat5 pathway. Leuk Res. 2019;79:6-16

172. Kase H, Iwahashi K, Nakanishi S, Matsuda Y, Yamada K, Takahashi M. et al. K-252 compounds, novel and potent inhibitors of protein kinase c and cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987;142:436-40

173. Kaneko M, Saito Y, Saito H, Matsumoto T, Matsuda Y, Vaught JL. et al. Neurotrophic 3,9-bis[(alkylthio)methyl]-and-bis(alkoxymethyl)-k-252a derivatives. J Med Chem. 1997;40:1863-9

174. Nheu TV, He H, Hirokawa Y, Tamaki K, Florin L, Schmitz ML. et al. The k252a derivatives, inhibitors for the pak/mlk kinase family selectively block the growth of ras transformants. Cancer J. 2002;8:328-36

175. Karaman MW, Herrgard S, Treiber DK, Gallant P, Atteridge CE, Campbell BT. et al. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:127-32

176. Maksimoska J, Feng L, Harms K, Yi C, Kissil J, Marmorstein R. et al. Targeting large kinase active site with rigid, bulky octahedral ruthenium complexes. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:15764-5

177. Blanck S, Maksimoska J, Baumeister J, Harms K, Marmorstein R, Meggers E. The art of filling protein pockets efficiently with octahedral metal complexes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012;51:5244-6

178. Guo C, Johnson MC, Li H, Marakovits JT, Mcalpine IJ, Dong L. Pyrimidine amino pyrazole compounds, potent kinase inhibitors. WO 2007023382 A2. 2007

179. Aliagas-Martin I, Crawford J, Lee W, Mathieu S, Rudolph J. Serine/threonine pak1 inhibitors. WO 2013026914 A1. 2013

180. Murray BW, Guo C, Piraino J, Westwick JK, Zhang C, Lamerdin J. et al. Small-molecule p21-activated kinase inhibitor pf-3758309 is a potent inhibitor of oncogenic signaling and tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:9446-51

181. Rosen LS, Blumenkopf TA, Breazna A, Darang S, Eckhardt SG. Phase i, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of single-agent pf-03758309, an oral pak inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2011;10:A177

182. Campbell D, Durón SG, Vollrath B, Wade W. Compounds for treating neuropsychiatric conditions. US 8674095 B2. 2014

183. Vollrath B, Campbell D, Durón SG, Wade W. 8-ethyl-6-(aryl)pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-7(8h)-ones for the treatment of cns disorders. US 8372970 B2. 2013

184. Mckew JC, Huang W, David C, Duron SG, Mark B, Shen M. Pak inhibitors for the treatment of fragile x syndrome. US 20150031693 A1. 2013

185. DAVID C, G DS. Pak inhibitors for the treatment of cell proliferative disorders. WO 2013067423 A1. 2013

186. Licciulli S, Maksimoska J, Zhou C, Troutman S, Kota S, Liu Q. et al. Frax597, a small molecule inhibitor of the p21-activated kinases, inhibits tumorigenesis of neurofibromatosis type 2 (nf2)-associated schwannomas. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:29105-14

187. Dolan BM, Duron SG, Campbell DA, Vollrath B, Shankaranarayana Rao BS, Ko HY. et al. Rescue of fragile x syndrome phenotypes in fmr1 ko mice by the small-molecule pak inhibitor frax486. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:5671-6

188. Ndubaku CO, Crawford JJ, Drobnick J, Aliagas I, Campbell D, Dong P. et al. Design of selective pak1 inhibitor g-5555: Improving properties by employing an unorthodox low-pk a polar moiety. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2015;6:1241-6

189. Xu Y, Foulks JM, Clifford A, Brenning B, Lai S, Luo B. et al. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of 2-arylamino-4-aryl-pyrimidines as potent pak1 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23:4072-5

190. Crawford JJ, Lee W, Aliagas I, Mathieu S, Hoeflich KP, Zhou W. et al. Structure-guided design of group i selective p21-activated kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2015;58:5121-36

191. Lee W, Crawford JJ, Aliagas I, Murray LJ, Tay S, Wang W. et al. Synthesis and evaluation of a series of 4-azaindole-containing p21-activated kinase-1 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26:3518-24

192. Hao C, Zhao F, Song H, Guo J, Li X, Jiang X. et al. Structure-based design of 6-chloro-4-aminoquinazoline-2-carboxamide derivatives as potent and selective p21-activated kinase 4 (pak4) inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2018;61:265-85

193. Rudolph J, Murray LJ, Ndubaku CO, O'Brien T, Blackwood E, Wang W. et al. Chemically diverse group i p21-activated kinase (pak) inhibitors impart acute cardiovascular toxicity with a narrow therapeutic window. J Med Chem. 2016;59:5520-41

194. Ferenc B, Csaba SK, Zoltan G, Jeno M, Zoltan V, Gyorgy K. et al. [development of pak1 kinase inhibitors with "in silico" modeling methods]. Acta Pharm Hung. 2010;80:155-61

195. Porchia LM, Guerra M, Wang YC, Zhang Y, Espinosa AV, Shinohara M. et al. 2-amino-n-{4-[5-(2-phenanthrenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1h-pyrazol-1-yl]-phenyl} acetamide (osu-03012), a celecoxib derivative, directly targets p21-activated kinase. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;72:1124-31

196. Zhou Y, Zhang J, Wang J, Cheng MS, Zhao DM, Li F. Targeting pak1 with the small molecule drug ak963/40708899 suppresses gastric cancer cell proliferation and invasion by downregulation of pak1 activity and pak1-related signaling pathways. Anat Rec. 2019;302:1571-9

197. Zhang J, Zou L, Tang P, Pan D, He Z, Yao D. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 1h-pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidine derivatives as pak1 inhibitors that trigger apoptosis, er stress and anti-migration effect in mda-mb-231 cells. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;194:112220

198. Deacon SW, Beeser A, Fukui JA, Rennefahrt UE, Myers C, Chernoff J. et al. An isoform-selective, small-molecule inhibitor targets the autoregulatory mechanism of p21-activated kinase. Chem Biol. 2008;15:322-31

199. Karpov AS, Amiri P, Bellamacina C, Bellance MH, Breitenstein W, Daniel D. et al. Optimization of a dibenzodiazepine hit to a potent and selective allosteric pak1 inhibitor. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2015;6:776-81

200. Kim DJ, Choi CK, Lee CS, Park MH, Tian X, Kim ND. et al. Small molecules that allosterically inhibit p21-activated kinase activity by binding to the regulatory p21-binding domain. Exp Mol Med. 2016;48:e229

Author contact

Corresponding authors: Jinhui Wang, E-mail: wangjinhuiedu.cn; Tel/Tax: +86-755-86671989. Jin Zhang, E-mail: zhangjinjin8916com; Tel/Tax: (+86)28-85164063.

Received 2020-4-11
Accepted 2020-7-23
Published 2020-8-1

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use