NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Strategies for resolving skeleton junctions

(A) A minimal skeleton. (B) Skan’s classification of pixels into endpoints, paths, and junctions based on the number of neighbours (1, 2, and 3 or more, respectively). (C) Identical classification in Fiji’s Analyze Skeletons. (D) Skeleton measurement when junctions are assigned an implicit “extent”. (E) Skeleton measurement when all adjacent junction pixels are replaced by their centroid (our default strategy). (F) Skeleton measurement used in Fiji’s Analyze skeletons (mid-2017 version).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3521v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Juan Nunez-Iglesias conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Adam J Blanch conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Oliver Looker performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Matthew W Dixon performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Leann Tilley conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The University of Melbourne, School of Biomedical Sciences, Human Ethics Advisory Group (HEAG) provided ethical approval for this study (ETHICS ID – 1135799).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Code: https://github.com/jni/skan

Data:

Open Science Framework public project, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/SVPFU

https://osf.io/svpfu/

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (grant number FL150100106). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads